Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:42:33.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural influences upon advance care planning in a family-centric society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

Keson Tay ,
Rachel Jia Yu Lee ,
Shin Wei Sim ,
Sumytra Menon ,
Ravindran Kanesvaran  and
Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Keson Tay
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Rachel Jia Yu Lee
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Shin Wei Sim
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
Sumytra Menon
Affiliation:
Lien Centre of Palliative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
Ravindran Kanesvaran
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna*
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center–Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore169610. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Advanced care plans (ACPs) are designed to convey the wishes of patients with regards to their care in the event of incapacity. There are a number of prerequisites for creation of an effective ACP. First, the patient must be aware of their condition, their prognosis, the likely trajectory of the illness, and the potential treatment options available to them. Second, patient input into ACP must be free of any coercive factors. Third, the patient must be able to remain involved in adapting their ACP as their condition evolves. Continued use of familial determination and collusion within the local healthcare system, however, has raised concerns that the basic requirements for effective ACP cannot be met.

Method:

To assess the credibility of these concerns, we employed a video vignette approach depicting a family of three adult children discussing whether or not to reveal a cancer diagnosis to their mother. Semistructured interviews with 72 oncology patients and 60 of their caregivers were conducted afterwards to explore the views of the participants on the different positions taken by the children.

Results:

Collusion, family-centric decision making, adulteration of information provided to patients, and circumnavigation of patient involvement appear to be context-dependent. Patients and families alike believe that patients should be told of their conditions. However, the incidence of collusion and familial determination increases with determinations of a poor prognosis, a poor anticipated response to chemotherapy, and a poor premorbid health status. Financial considerations with respect to care determinations remain secondary considerations.

Significance of results:

Our data suggest that ACPs can be effectively constructed in family-centric societies so long as healthcare professionals continue to update and educate families on the patient's situation. Collusion and familial intervention in the decision-making process are part of efforts to protect the patient from distress and are neither solely dependent on cultural nor an “all-or-nothing” phenomenon. The response of families are context-dependent and patient-specific, weighing the patient's right to know and prepare and the potential distress it is likely to cause. In most cases, the news is broken gently over time to allow the patient to digest the information and for the family to assess how well they cope with the news. Furthermore, the actions of families are dependent upon their understanding of the situation, highlighting the need for continued engagement with healthcare professionals.

Keywords

Advance care planningEnd-of-life carePalliative medicineCollusionFamilial decision making
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 15 , Issue 6 , December 2017 , pp. 665 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, C., Wuest, J. & Stern, P.N. (1992). Method slurring: The grounded theory/phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(11), 1355–1360.Google Scholar
Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, A., Rietjens, J.A. & van der Heide, A. (2014). The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 28(8), 1000–1025. Epub ahead of print Mar 20. Available from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269216314526272.Google Scholar
Chan, C.K.L. & Yau, M. (2009). Death preparation among the ethnic Chinese well-elderly in Singapore: An exploratory study. Omega, 60(3), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, E.A., Cheung, K., Mok, E., et al. (2006). A narrative inquiry into the Hong Kong Chinese adults' concept of health through their cultural stories. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 301–309.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (eds.), pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London. Sage Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Morse, J.M. et al. (eds.), pp. 127–154. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, C.Y. (1986). The concept of face and its Confucian roots. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 13(3), 329–348.Google Scholar
Cheng, K.Y., Ming, T. & Lai, A. (2012). Can familialism be justified? Bioethics, 26(8), 431–439. Epub ahead of print Feb 14, 2011.Google Scholar
Chong, J.A., Quah, Y.L., Yang, G.M., et al. (2013). Patient and family involvement in decision making for management of cancer patients at a centre in Singapore. BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, 5(4), 420–426. Epub ahead of print Jan 3.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. & Seymour, J. (2010). “At the foot of a very long ladder”: Discussing the end of life with older people and informal caregivers. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 40(6), 857–869. Available from http://www.jpsmjournal.com/article/S0885-3924(10)00524-5/pdf.Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fan, R. (1997). Self-determination vs. family determination: Two incommensurable principles of autonomy. A report from East Asia. Bioethics, 11(3–4), 309–322.Google Scholar
Fan, R. (2007). Which care? Whose responsibility? And why family? A Confucian account of long-term care of the elderly. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32(5), 495–517.Google Scholar
Finch, F. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21(1), 105–114. Available from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0038038587021001008.Google Scholar
Foo, W.T., Zheng, Y., Yang, G.M., et al. (2013). Factors considered in end-of-life care decision making by health care professionals, American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 30(4), 354–358. Available from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049909112453193.Google Scholar
Fried, T.R., O'Leary, J., Van Ness, P., et al. (2007 a). Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55(7), 1007–1014. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1948955/pdf/nihms-28337.pdf.Google Scholar
Fried, T.R., Van Ness, P.H., Byers, A.L., et al. (2007 b). Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(4), 495–501. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1839865/pdf/11606_2007_Article_104.pdf.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, T.R., Bullock, K., Iannone, L., et al. (2009). Understanding advance care planning as a process of health behavior change. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57(9), 1547–1555. Epub ahead of print Aug 4. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2783892/pdf/nihms-136130.pdf.Google Scholar
Goh, C.R. (2007). Culture, ethnicity and illness. In Palliative medicine. Walsh, T.D. et al. (eds.), pp. 51–54. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier.Google Scholar
Goh, C.R. (2008). Challenges of cultural diversity. In Supportive care in heart failure. Beattie, J. & Goodlin, S. (eds.), pp. 451–461. New York: Oxford University Press..Google Scholar
Ho, A. (2008). Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 22(1), 128–135.Google Scholar
Ho, M.C. (2004). Death and dying: Advance directives, autonomy and family. Bioethics, 18(2), 87–103 Google Scholar
Ho, M.Z.J., Krishna, L. & Yee, A.C.P. (2010). Chinese familial tradition and Western influences: A case study in Singapore on decision making at the end of life. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 40(6), 932–936. Available from http://www.jpsmjournal.com/article/S0885-3924(10)00627-5/pdf.Google Scholar
Ho, Z.J.M., Krishna, L.K.R., Goh, C., et al. (2012). The physician–patient relationship in treatment decision making at the end of life: A pilot study of cancer patients in a Southeast Asian society. Palliative & Support Care, 11(1), 13–19. Epub ahead of print Jul 18.Google Scholar
Hui, E. (2008). Parental refusal of life saving treatments for adolescents: Chinese familialism in medical decision making revisited. Bioethics, 22(95), 286–295.Google Scholar
Kennedy, T.J. & Lingard, L.A. (2006). Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Medical Education, 40(2), 101–108.Google Scholar
Krishna, L. (2011 a). The position of the family of palliative care patients within the decision making process at the end of life in Singapore. Ethics & Medicine, 27(3), 183–190.Google Scholar
Krishna, L. (2011 b). Decision making at the end of life: A Singaporean perspective. Asian Bioethics Review, 3(2), 118–126.Google Scholar
Krishna, L.K.R. (2012). Prognostication. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 22(4), 150–156.Google Scholar
Krishna, L.K.R. (2013). Personhood within the context of sedation at the end of life in Singapore. BMJ Case Reports, pii: bcr2013009264. Epub ahead of print Jun 7. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702924/pdf/bcr-2013-009264.pdf.Google Scholar
Krishna, L.K.R. (2014). Accounting for personhood in palliative sedation: The Ring Theory of Personhood. Medical Humanities, 40(1), 17–21. Epub ahead of print Sep 26, 2013.Google Scholar
Krishna, L.K.R. & Alsuwaigh, R. (2014). Understanding the fluid nature of personhood: The Ring Theory of Personhood. Bioethics, 29(3), 171–181.Google Scholar
Krishna, L.K.R. & Kwek, S.Y. (2014). The changing face of personhood at the end of life: The Ring Theory of Personhood. Palliative & Supportive Care, 13(4), 1123–1129. Epub ahead of print Jul 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishna, L.K.R., Alsuwaigh, R., Miti, P.T., et al. (2013). The influence of the family in conceptions of personhood in the palliative care setting in Singapore and Its influence upon decision making. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 31(6), 645–654. Epub ahead of print Aug 13. Available from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049909113500136.Google Scholar
Lingard, L., Albert, M. & Levinson, W. (2008). Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ, 337, a567. Available from https://depts.washington.edu/fammed/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/lingard_2008_bmj_-_grounded_theory_mixed_methods_and_action_research.pdf.Google Scholar
Lovell, A.& Yates, P. (2014). Advance care planning in palliative care: A systematic literature review of the contextual factors influencing its uptake 2008–2012. Palliative Medicine, 28(8), 1026–1035. Epub ahead of print May 12. Available from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269216314531313.Google Scholar
Low, J.A., Ng, W.C., Yap, K.B., et al. (2000). End-of-life issues: Preferences and choices of a group of elderly Chinese subjects attending a day care centre in Singapore. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 29(1), 50–56.Google Scholar
Low, J.A., Kiow, S.L., Main, N., et al. (2009). Reducing collusion between family members and clinicians of patients referred to the palliative care team. The Permanente Journal, 13(4), 11–15. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2911829/pdf/prjl.13.4.011.pdf.Google Scholar
MacPherson, A., Walshe, C., O'Donnell, V., et al. (2013). The views of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on advance care planning: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 27(3), 265–272. Epub ahead of print Mar 26, 2012. Available from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269216312440606.Google Scholar
Merrill, S.B. (1998). Defining personhood: Towards the ethics of quality in clinical care. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, J.K., Back, M.F., Lu, J.J., et al. (2002). Cultural attitudes to cancer management in traditional South East Asian patients. Australasian Radiology, 46(4), 370–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ong, W.Y., Yee, C.M. & Lee, A. (2012). Ethical dilemmas in the care of cancer patients near the end of life. Singapore Medical Journal, 53(1), 11–16. Available from http://smj.sma.org.sg/5301/5301ra2.pdf.Google Scholar
Phua, J., Kee, A.C., Tan, A., et al. (2011). End-of-life care in the general wards of a Singaporean hospital: An Asian perspective. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(12), 1296–2301.Google Scholar
Russell, S. (2014). Advance care planning: Whose agenda is it anyway? Palliative Medicine, 28(8), 997–999. Available from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269216314543426.Google Scholar
Sbaraini, A., Carter, S.M., Wendell Evans, R., et al. (2011).How to do a grounded theory study: A worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 128. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184112/pdf/1471-2288-11-128.pdf.Google Scholar
Starks, H. & Trinidad, S.B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380. Available from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049732307307031.Google Scholar
Tan, J.O.A., Chin, J.J.L., Kaan, T.S.H., et al. (2011). What doctors say about care of the dying. Singapore: The Lien Foundation. Available from http://www.lienfoundation.org/sites/default/files/What_Doctors_Say_About_Care_of_the_Dying_0.pdf,Google Scholar
Tan, T.K., Teo, F.C., Wong, K., et al. (1993). Cancer: To tell or not to tell? Singapore Medical Journal, 34(3), 202–203.Google Scholar
Teo, K.S. (2007). Confucian health care in Singapore. In The family, medical decision making and biotechnology. Lee, S. (ed.), pp. 207–215. New York: Springer Direct.Google Scholar
Teo, P. (2004). Health care for older persons in Singapore: Integrating state and community provisions with individual support. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 16(1), 43–67.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. (1990). Filial piety, social change, and Singapore youth. Journal of Moral Education, 19(3), 192–205.Google Scholar
Toh, H.C. (2011). Providing hope in terminal cancer: When is it appropriate and when is not? Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 40(1), 50–55. Available from http://www.annals.edu.sg/pdf/40VolNo1Jan2011/V40N1p50.pdf.Google Scholar
Tsai, D.F. (1999). Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(4), 315–321. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC479240/pdf/jmedeth00005-0025.pdf.Google Scholar
Tsai, D.F. (2001). How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27(1), 44–50. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1733353/pdf/v027p00044.pdf.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimpenny, P. & Gass, J. (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1485–1492.Google Scholar
Wong, Y.S. & Verbrugge, L.M. (2009). Living alone: Elderly Chinese Singaporeans Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 24(3), 209–224. Available from http://tsaofoundation.org/doc/Older_Singaporeans_Living_Alone.pdf.Google Scholar
Yang, M.G., Kwee, A.K. & Krishna, L. (2012). Should patients and family be involved in “Do not resuscitate” decisions? Views of oncology and palliative care doctors and nurses. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 18(1), 52–58.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. (2012). Reflection on family consent: Based on a pregnant death in a Beijing Hospital. Developing World Bioethics, 12(3), 164–168. Epub ahead of print Jan 25, 2011.Google Scholar