Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:38:48.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Caring for people dying in acute hospitals: A mixed-methods study to examine relative's perceptions of care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2014

Katherine Clark*
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Jess Cain
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Lyn Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Naomi Byfieldt
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Katherine Clark, Department of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Edith Street, Waratah 2298, NSW, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

Improving the care provided for people dying in acute healthcare facilities has been identified as a priority for Australian healthcare. Previous observations support the idea that quality care improves outcomes for the dying person as well as for their relatives. To improve care it is essential that there be a clear understanding of which issues require attention. The aim of our project was to improve the understanding of the experiences of family members whose relatives had died on an acute medical ward.

Method:

A mixed-methods approach was adopted for our study. With the approval of the human ethics committee, relatives were approached within three months of the death of their family member and invited to participate in an interview based on a quality-of-dying-and-death (QoDD) tool.

Results:

Of the 50 families approached, 10 agreed to be interviewed. When they were asked to reflect on the experiences of the dying person, the issues that they articulated most strongly related to the need to have time before death to address issues and spend time with important others. With regards to the needs of the dying person's relatives, people articulated strongly that they needed information, support, and evidence of good symptom control. The provision of support post-death was also poignantly highlighted.

Significance of Results:

This study supports observations made in other clinical areas that have identified that timely communication, good symptom control, and ongoing support for both the dying person and their family has important ramifications. Articulating such details is an important part of understanding which aspects of care require attention.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abernethy, A.P., Currow, D.C., Fazekas, B.S., et al. (2008). Specialized palliative care services are associated with improved short- and long-term caregiver outcomes. Supportive Care in Cancer, 16(6), 585597.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2013). Palliative care services in Australia, 2013. Canberra: AIHW.Google Scholar
Bruera, E., Bush, S.H., Willey, J., et al. (2009). Impact of delirium and recall on the level of distress in patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. Cancer, 115(9), 20042012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, R.A. (2013). Is pathological grief lasting more than 12 months grief or depression? Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 26(1), 4146.Google Scholar
Buckley, T., Sunari, D., Marshall, A., et al. (2012). Physiological correlates of bereavement and the impact of bereavement interventions. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(2), 129139.Google Scholar
Christakis, N.A. & Iwashyna, T.J. (2003). The health impact of health care on families: A matched cohort study of hospice use by decedents and mortality outcomes in surviving widowed spouses. Social Science & Medicine, 57(3), 465475.Google Scholar
Clark, K., Byfieldt, N., Green, M., et al. (2014). Dying in two acute hospitals: Would usual care meet Australian national clinical standards?Australian Health Review, in press.Google Scholar
Currow, D.C., Ward, A.M., Plummer, J.L., et al. (2008). Comfort in the last 2 weeks of life: Relationship to accessing palliative care services. Supportive Care in Cancer, 16(11), 12551263.Google Scholar
Curtis, J.R., Downey, L. & Engelberg, R.A. (2013). The quality of dying and death: Is it ready for use as an outcome measure? Chest, 143(2), 289291.Google Scholar
LeGrand, S.B. (2012). Delirium in palliative medicine: A review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 44(4), 583594.Google Scholar
Levy, C.R., Ely, E.W., Payne, K., et al. (2005). Quality of dying and death in two medical ICUs: Perceptions of family and physicians. Chest, 127(5), 17751783.Google Scholar
Levy, M.H., Adolph, M.D., Back, A., et al. (2012). Palliative care. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 10(10), 12841309.Google Scholar
McNamara, B. & Rosenwax, L. (2010). Which carers of family members at the end of life need more support from health services and why? Social Science & Medicine, 70(7), 10351041.Google Scholar
Murtagh, F.E.M., Bausewein, C., Verne, J., et al. (2013). How many people need palliative care? A study developing and comparing methods for population-based samples. Palliative Medicine, 28(1), 4958. Epub ahead of print May 21.Google Scholar
Stajduhar, K.I., Martin, W. & Cairns, M. (2010). What makes grief difficult? Perspectives from bereaved family caregivers and healthcare providers of advanced cancer patients. Palliative & Supportive Care, 8(3), 277289.Google Scholar
van der Klink, M.A., Heijboer, L., Hofhuis, J.G., et al. (2010). Survey into bereavement of family members of patients who died in the intensive care unit. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 26(4), 215225.Google Scholar