Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T20:43:33.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of palliative sedation: A comparison of attitudes of French-speaking physicians from Quebec and Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2014

Serge Dumont ,
Danielle Blondeau ,
Véronique Turcotte ,
Gian Domenico Borasio ,
Thierry Currat ,
Rose-Anna Foley  and
Michel Beauverd
Serge Dumont*
Affiliation:
School of Social Service, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
Danielle Blondeau
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
Véronique Turcotte
Affiliation:
Laval University Cancer Research Centre, Quebec City, Canada
Gian Domenico Borasio
Affiliation:
Palliative Care Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
Thierry Currat
Affiliation:
Palliative Care Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
Rose-Anna Foley
Affiliation:
Palliative Care Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
Michel Beauverd
Affiliation:
Palliative Care Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Serge Dumont, School of Social Work, Pavillon Charles de Koninck, 1030, Avenue des Sciences Humaines, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada G1V 0A6. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Previous literature has suggested that laws and regulations may impact the use of palliative sedation. Our present study compares the attitudes of French-speaking physicians practicing in the Quebec and Swiss environments, where different laws are in place regarding physician-assisted suicide.

Method:

Data were drawn from two prior studies, one by Blondeau and colleagues and another by Beauverd and coworkers, employing the same two-by-two experimental design with length of prognosis and type of suffering as independent variables. Both the effect of these variables and the effect of their interaction on Swiss and Quebec physicians' attitudes toward sedation were compared. The written comments of respondents were submitted to a qualitative content analysis and summarized in a comparative perspective.

Results:

The analysis of variance showed that only the type of suffering had an effect on physicians' attitudes toward sedation. The results of the Wilcoxon test indicated that the attitudes of physicians from Quebec and Switzerland tended to be different for two vignettes: long-term prognosis with existential suffering (p = 0.0577) and short-term prognosis with physical suffering (p = 0.0914). In both cases, the Swiss physicians were less prone to palliative sedation.

Significance of results:

The attitudes of physicians from Quebec and Switzerland toward palliative sedation, particularly regarding prognosis and type of suffering, seem similar. However, the results suggest that physicians from Quebec could be slightly more open to palliative sedation, even though most were not in favor of this practice as an answer to end-of-life existential suffering.

Keywords

SedationLawsRegulationsEnd of lifeDecision making
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 839 - 847
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anquinet, L., Rietjens, J.A., Seale, C., et al. (2012). The practice of continuous deep sedation until death in Flanders (Belgium), the Netherlands, and the U.K.: A comparative study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 44(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
Battin, M.P. (2008). Terminal sedation: Pulling the sheet over our eyes. Hastings Center Report, 38(5), 27–30.Google Scholar
Beauverd, M., Bernard, M., Currat, T., et al. (2013). French Swiss physicians' attitude toward palliative sedation: Influence of prognosis and type of suffering. Palliative & Supportive Care, June 17, 1–6. Epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
Beel, A., McClement, S.E. & Harlos, M. (2002). Palliative sedation therapy: A review of definitions and usage. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 8(4), 190–199.Google Scholar
Billings, J.A. & Block, S.D. (1996). Slow euthanasia. Journal of Palliative Care, 12(4), 21–30.Google Scholar
Blanker, M.H., Koerhuis-Roessink, M., Swart, S.J., et al. (2012). Pressure during decision making of continuous sedation in end-of-life situations in Dutch general practice. BMC Family Practice, 13, 68.Google Scholar
Blondeau, D., Roy, L., Dumont, S., et al. (2005). Physicians' and pharmacists' attitudes toward the use of sedation at the end of life: Influence of prognosis and type of suffering. Journal of Palliative Care, 21(4), 238–245.Google Scholar
Blondeau, D., Dumont, S., Roy, L., et al. (2009). Attitudes of Quebec doctors toward sedation at the end of life: An exploratory study. Palliative & Supportive Care, 7(3), 331–337.Google Scholar
Braun, T.C., Hagen, N.A. & Clark, T. (2003). Development of a clinical practice guideline for palliative sedation. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 6(3), 345–350.Google Scholar
Bruce, A. & Boston, P. (2011). Relieving existential suffering through palliative sedation: Discussion of an uneasy practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(12), 2732–2740.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, T.A., Pomerantz, S.C., Ciesielski, J., et al. (2002). Attitudes of osteopathic physicians toward physician-assisted suicide. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 102(1), 27–34.Google Scholar
Chambaere, K., Bilsen, J., Cohen, J., et al. (2010). Continuous deep sedation until death in Belgium: A nationwide survey. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(5), 490–493.Google Scholar
Chater, S., Viola, R., Paterson, J., et al. (1998). Sedation for intractable distress in the dying: A survey of experts. Palliative Medicine, 12(4), 255–269.Google Scholar
Cherny, N.I. (2006). Sedation for the care of patients with advanced cancer. Nature Clinical Practice. Oncology, 3(9), 492–500.Google Scholar
Cherny, N.I. & Portenoy, R.K. (1994). Sedation in the management of refractory symptoms: Guidelines for evaluation and treatment. Journal of Palliative Care, 10(2), 31–38.Google Scholar
Chiu, T.Y., Hu, W.Y., Lue, B.H., et al. (2001). Sedation for refractory symptoms of terminal cancer patients in Taiwan. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 21(6), 467–472.Google Scholar
Claessens, P., Menten, J., Schotsmans, P., et al. (2008). Palliative sedation: A review of the research literature. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 36(3), 310–333.Google Scholar
Cooney, G.A. (2005). Palliative sedation: The ethical controversy. Available from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/499472.Google Scholar
Cowan, J.D. & Walsh, D. (2001). Terminal sedation in palliative medicine: Definition and review of the literature. Supportive Care in Cancer, 9(6), 403–407.Google Scholar
Curlin, F.A., Nwodim, C., Vance, J.L., et al. (2008). To die, to sleep: US physicians' religious and other objections to physician-assisted suicide, terminal sedation, and withdrawal of life support. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 25(2), 112–120.Google Scholar
de Graeff, A. & Dean, M. (2007). Palliative sedation therapy in the last weeks of life: A literature review and recommendations for standards. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 10(1), 67–85.Google Scholar
Douglas, C., Kerridge, I. & Ankeny, R. (2008). Managing intentions: The end-of-life administration of analgesics and sedatives, and the possibility of slow euthanasia. Bioethics, 22(7), 388–396.Google Scholar
Fainsinger, R.L., de Moissac, D., Mancini, I., et al. (2000 a). Sedation for delirium and other symptoms in terminally ill patients in Edmonton. Journal of Palliative Care, 16(2), 5–10.Google Scholar
Fainsinger, R.L., Waller, A., Bercovici, M., et al. (2000 b). A multicentre international study of sedation for uncontrolled symptoms in terminally ill patients. Palliative Medicine, 14(4), 257–265.Google Scholar
Georges, J.J., The, A.M., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D., et al. (2008). Dealing with requests for euthanasia: A qualitative study investigating the experience of general practitioners. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(3), 150–155.Google Scholar
Goelitz, A. (2003). Suicidal ideation at end-of-life: The palliative care team's role. Palliative & Supportive Care, 1(3), 275–278.Google Scholar
Goncalves, F., Cordero, A., Almeida, A., et al. (2012). A survey of the sedation practice of Portuguese palliative care teams. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(12), 3123–3127.Google Scholar
González Barón, M., Gomez Raposo, C. & Pinto Marin, A. (2005). Sedation in clinical oncology. Clinical & Translational Oncology, 7(7), 295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, M.A., Nelson, H.D., Tilden, V.P., et al. (1996). Legalizing assisted suicide: Views of physicians in Oregon. The New England Journal of Medicine, 334(5), 310–315.Google Scholar
Maltoni, M., Pittureri, C., Scarpi, E., et al. (2009). Palliative sedation therapy does not hasten death: Results from a prospective multicenter study. Annals of Oncology, 20(7), 1163–1169.Google Scholar
Maltoni, M., Scarpi, E., Rosati, M., et al. (2012). Palliative sedation in end-of-life care and survival: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(12), 1378–1383.Google Scholar
Miccinesi, G., Rietjens, J.A., Deliens, L., et al. (2006). Continuous deep sedation: Physicians' experiences in six European countries. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 31(2), 122–129.Google Scholar
Morita, T., Tsunoda, J., Inoue, S., et al. (1999). Do hospice clinicians sedate patients intending to hasten death? Journal of Palliative Care, 15(3), 20–23.Google Scholar
Morita, T., Akechi, T., Sugawara, Y., et al. (2002). Practices and attitudes of Japanese oncologists and palliative care physicians concerning terminal sedation: A nationwide survey. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(3), 758–764.Google Scholar
Moynier-Vantieghem, K. & Beauverd, M. (2008). Clinical and practical aspects of palliative sedation [in French]. Revue Medicale Suisse, 4(145), 462–466.Google Scholar
Muller-Busch, H.C., Andres, I. & Jehser, T. (2003). Sedation in palliative care: A critical analysis of 7 years experience. BMC Palliative Care, 2(1), 2.Google Scholar
National Ethics Committee and Veterans Health Administration (2006). The ethics of palliative sedation as a therapy of last resort. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 23(6), 483–491.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, S.C., Bhatt, H., Brodsky, N.L., et al. (2004). Physicians' practices related to the use of terminal sedation: Moral and ethical concerns. Palliative & Supportive Care, 2(1), 15–21.Google Scholar
Quill, T.E. & Byock, I.R. (2000). Responding to intractable terminal suffering: The role of terminal sedation and voluntary refusal of food and fluids. ACP–ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel. American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 132(5), 408–414.Google Scholar
Raus, K., Sterckx, S. & Mortier, F. (2011). Is continuous sedation at the end of life an ethically preferable alternative to physician-assisted suicide? The American Journal of Bioethics, 11(6), 32–40.Google Scholar
Raus, K., Anquinet, L., Rietjens, J., et al. (2012). Factors that facilitate or constrain the use of continuous sedation at the end of life by physicians and nurses in Belgium: Results from a focus group study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(4), 230–234.Google Scholar
Rietjens, J.A., van Delden, J.J., van der Heide, A., et al. (2006). Terminal sedation and euthanasia: A comparison of clinical practices. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(7), 749–753.Google Scholar
Rietjens, J., van Delden, J., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., et al. (2008). Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in The Netherlands: Descriptive study. BMJ, 336(7648), 810–813.Google Scholar
Rietjens, J.A., Buiting, H.M., Pasman, H.R., et al. (2009). Deciding about continuous deep sedation: Physicians' perspectives. A focus group study. Palliative Medicine, 23(5), 410–417.Google Scholar
Rietjens, J.A., Voorhees, J.R., van der Heide, A., et al. (2012). Approaches to suffering at the end of life: The use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(4), 235–240.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P.C. (2006). Palliative sedation and the fear of legal ramifications. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 9(2), 246–247.Google Scholar
Rys, S., Deschepper, R., Mortier, F., et al. (2012). The moral difference or equivalence between continuous sedation until death and physician-assisted death: Word games or war games? A qualitative content analysis of opinion pieces in the indexed medical and nursing literature. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9(2), 171–183.Google Scholar
Seale, C. (2010). Continuous deep sedation in medical practice: A descriptive study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 39(1), 44–53.Google Scholar
Sercu, M., Pype, P., Christiaens, T., et al. (2012). Are general practitioners prepared to end life on request in a country where euthanasia is legalised? Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(5), 274–280.Google Scholar
Seymour, J.E., Janssens, R. & Broeckaert, B. (2007). Relieving suffering at the end of life: practitioners' perspectives on palliative sedation from three European countries. Social Science & Medicine, 64(8), 1679–1691.Google Scholar
Sykes, N. & Thorns, A. (2003). Sedative use in the last week of life and the implications for end-of-life decision making. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(3), 341–344.Google Scholar