Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:04:55.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Not a nice experience, not at all”: Underprivileged women's experiences of being confronted with cervical cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2014

Johanna E. Maree ,
Gayle Langley  and
Lucy Nqubezelo
Johanna E. Maree*
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa
Gayle Langley
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa
Lucy Nqubezelo
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Johanna E. Maree, Department of Nursing Education, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown 2193, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Research on women's experiences of cervical cancer as a health problem focuses primarily on cervical screening, while their experiences of cervical cancer as a disease seem to be underresearched. This study addresses this understudied area and aims to yield insight into the experiences of underprivileged women confronted with this disease.

Method:

Our study was qualitative, exploratory, and contextual with descriptive and interpretive elements. The context of the study was a radiation oncology department at an academic hospital in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. The target population was all patients diagnosed with cervical cancer referred for treatment at the specific hospital. Convenience sampling selected participants typical of the population. Nineteen open-ended unstructured interviews were conducted after demographic data were collected. One question was posed: “Please tell me what made you think there was something wrong with you?” Thematic analyses were used to analyze the data.

Results:

The average age of participants was 47.2 years, with a youngest participant of 29 and oldest of 70. Three themes arose from the data: experiencing the symptoms of cervical cancer, hearing the bad news, and what remained unsaid.

Significance of Results:

Being confronted with cervical cancer is a traumatic experience. Women suffer unexplained, severe, humiliating vaginal bleeding and unrelieved pain. They have to face a dual healthcare system: on the one hand, unaffordable effective private healthcare and, on the other, the free-of-cost public healthcare that failed them. The bad news of their cervical cancer is most commonly broken in a kind and sympathetic manner, yet misunderstandings and a need for additional information prevail after the bad news conversation. Having to inform their families of their cancer adds to their suffering.

Keywords

Cervical cancerSouth Africaexperiencesunderprivileged women
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 239 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anorlu, R. (2008). Cervical cancer: The sub-Saharan African perspective. Reproductive Health Matters, 16, 41–49.Google Scholar
Back, A. & Curtis, J. (2002). Communicating bad news. Western Journal of Medicine, 176, 1.Google Scholar
Barclay, J.S., Blackhall, L.J. & Tulsky, J.A. (2007). Communication strategies and cultural issues in the delivery of bad news. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 10, 958–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Begley, C. (2008). Approaches to research. In Nursing research: Designs and methods. Watson, R. et al. (eds.), pp. 13–21. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brixey, L. (2004). The difficult task of delivering bad news. Dermatology Nursing/Dermatology Nurses' Association, 16, 347.Google Scholar
Brown, V.A., Parker, P.A., Furber, L., et al. (2011). Patient preferences for the delivery of bad news—the experience of a UK Cancer Centre. European Journal of Cancer Care, 20, 56–61.Google Scholar
Coovadia, H., Jewkes, R., Barron, P., et al. (2009). The health and health system of South Africa: Historical roots of current public health challenges. The Lancet, 374, 817–834.Google Scholar
Costantini, A., Baile, W., Lenzi, R., et al. (2009). Overcoming cultural barriers to giving bad news: Feasibility of training to promote truth-telling to cancer patients. Journal of Cancer Education, 24, 180–185.Google Scholar
Denny, L. & Anorlu, R. (2012). Cervical cancer in Africa. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 21, 1434–1438.Google Scholar
Eze, J.N., Emeka-Irem, E.N. & Edegbe, F.O. (2013). A six-year study of the clinical presentation of cervical cancer and the management challenges encountered at a state teaching hospital in southeast Nigeria. Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 7, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallowfield, L. & Jenkins, V. (1999). Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care. European Journal of Cancer, 35, 1592–1597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujimori, M. & Uchitomi, Y. (2009). Preferences of cancer patients regarding communication of bad news: A systematic literature review. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 39, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujimori, M., Akechi, T., Morita, T., et al. (2007). Preferences of cancer patients regarding the disclosure of bad news. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 573–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandhi, T.K., Kachalia, A., Thomas, E.J., et al. (2006). Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: A study of closed malpractice claims. Annals of Internal Medicine, 145, 488–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2012). Management of cervical cancer: Strategies for limited-resource centres. A guide for radiation oncologists. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
McCance, T. & Mcilfatrick, S. (2008). Phenomenology. In Nursing research: Designs and methods. Watson, R. et al. (eds.), pp. 243–250. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Miaskowski, C. (2005). The next step to improving cancer pain management. Pain Management Nursing, 6, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mojaki, M., Basu, D., Letskokgohka, M., et al. (2010). Referral steps in district health system are side-stepped. South African Medical Journal, 101, 109.Google Scholar
Mystakidou, K., Parpa, E., Tsilika, E., et al. (2004). Cancer information disclosure in different cultural contexts. Supportive Care in Cancer, 12, 147–154.Google Scholar
Schofield, P.E., Beeney, L.J., Thompson, J.F., et al. (2001). Hearing the bad news of a cancer diagnosis: The Australian melanoma patient's perspective. Annals of Oncology, 12, 365–371.Google Scholar
SouthAfrica.info (2012). Health care in South Africa. Retrieved February 11, 2012 from http://www.southafrica.info/about/health/health.htm.Google Scholar
Twycross, R. (2003). Introduction to palliative care, 4th ed.Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press.Google Scholar
Van Schalkwyk, S., Maree, J. & Wright, S. (2008). Cervical cancer: The route from signs and symptoms to treatment in South Africa. Reproductive Health Matters, 16, 9–17.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (@HO) (2006). Comprehensive cervical cancer control: A guide to essential practice. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2009). Strengthening cervical cancer prevention and control. Report of the GAVI–UNFPA–WHO meeting. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (2007). Strengthening cervical cancer prevention in Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar