Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:31:35.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability of Recent Unionid (Mollusca: Bivalvia) Communities Over the Past 6000 Years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Arthur E. Bogan
Arthur E. Bogan*
Affiliation:
Department of Malacology, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19103
Get access

Extract

Historically, the greatest freshwater bivalve species diversity in the world was in the Tennessee, Cumberland and Alabama River systems. The Tennessee River System had 94 and the Cumberland River System had 85 taxa reported (Starnes and Bogan, 1988). Ortmann (1918, 1924, 1925, 1926), Wilson and Clark (1914), Neel and Allen (1964), van der Schalie (1939, 1973) and van der Schalie and van der Schalie (1950) documented this diverse fauna. However, even in the early days of this century these authors noted the decline in the mussel populations and the loss of species from certain rivers (e.g. Ortmann, 1909a, 1918).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 5: Paleocommunity Temporal Dynamics: The Long-Term Development of Multispecies Assemblies , 1990 , pp. 112 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, F.C. 1925. The use of molluscan shells by the Cahokia mound builders. Transactions of the Illinois Academy of Science, 16:328–334.Google Scholar
Bogan, A.E. 1980. Analysis of Dallas subsistence at the Toqua Site (40MR6), compared with the historic Overhill Cherokee subsistence strategy. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 209 p.Google Scholar
Bogan, A.E. 1983. Faunal remains from the historic Cherokee occupation at Citico (40MR7) Monroe County, Tennessee. Tennessee Anthropologist, 8(1):28–49.Google Scholar
Bogan, A.E. 1987a. Chapter II. Faunal analysis: a comparison of Dallas and Overhill Cherokee subsistence strategies. With additional bone and shell artifact analyses by R.R. Polhemus. Vol. 2, p. 971–1111. In Polhemus, R.R., The Toqua Site: A late Mississippian Dallas Phase town. University of Tennessee Department of Anthropology Reports of Investigation No. 41 and Tennessee Valley Authority Publications in Anthropology, No. 44.Google Scholar
Bogan, A.E. 1987b. Molluscan remains from the Milner Site (22YZ515) and the O'Neil Site (22YZ624), Yazoo County, Mississippi. Appendix D, p. D1–D11. In Data Recovery at the Milner (22YZ515) and O'Neil Creek (22YZ624) sites, Yazoo County, Mississippi, final report. Contract No. DACW 38-84-D-002f for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg District, Vicksburg, Mississippi, by Heartfield, Price and Greene, Inc. Google Scholar
Bogan, A.E., and Bogan, C.M. 1985. Faunal remains, Chapter 7, p. 369–410. In Schroedl, G.F., Davis, R.P.S. Jr. and Boyd, C.C. Jr., Archaeological Contexts and Assemblages at Martin Farm. University of Tennessee, Department of Anthropology, Report of Investigations No. 39, Tennessee Valley Authority Publications in Anthropology, No. 37.Google Scholar
Bogan, A.E., Robison, N.D., and Bogan, C.M. 1987. A selected bibliography for zooarchaeology with an emphasis on Eastern North America, p. 66–202. In Bogan, A.E. and Robison, N.D. (eds.), The Zooarchaeology of Eastern North America: History, Method and Theory, and Bibliography. Tennessee Anthropological Association, Miscellaneous Paper, No. 12.Google Scholar
Breitburg, E. 1983. Paleoenvironmental exploitation strategies: the faunal data. In Cridlebaugh, P.A., Penitentiary Branch: a Late Archaic Cumberland River shell midden in Middle Tennessee. Contract Report to the Tennessee Division of Archaeology, Tennessee Department of Conservation, Contract #FA9234; Allotment 327.12, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Casey, J.L. 1986. The prehistoric exploitation of unionacean bivalve molluscs in the Lower Tennessee-Cumberland-Ohio River valleys in Western Kentucky. , Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. 176 p.Google Scholar
Matteson, M.R. 1960. Reconstruction of prehistoric environments through the analysis of molluscan collections from shell middens. American Antiquity, 26(1):117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A.C., Payne, B.S. and Siemsen, T. 1986. Description of the habitat of the endangered mussel, Plethobasus cooperianus. Nautilus, 100(1):14–18.Google Scholar
Morrison, J.P.E. 1942. Preliminary report on mollusks found in the shell mounds of the Pickwick Landing Basin in the Tennessee River Valley. In Webb, W.S. and DeJarnette, D.L., An Archaeological Survey of Pickwick Basin in the Adjacent Portions of the States of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin, 129:339–392.Google Scholar
Neel, J.K and Allen, W.R. 1964. The mussel fauna of the upper Cumberland Basin before its impoundment. Malacologia, 1(3):427–459.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1909a. The destruction of the fresh-water fauna in Western Pennsylvania. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 48(191):90–110, Pl.6.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1909b. Unionidae from an indian garbage heap. Nautilus, 23(1):11–15.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1918. The nayades (freshwater mussels) of the upper Tennessee drainage. With notes on synonymy and distribution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 57:521–626.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1924. The naiad-fauna of Duck River in Tennessee. American Midland Naturalist, 9(1):18–62.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1925. The naiad-fauna of the Tennessee River system below Walden Gorge. American Midland Naturalist, 9(7):321–372.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1926. The naiades of Green River drainage in Kentucky. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 17:167–188.Google Scholar
Parmalee, P.W. 1956. A comparison of past and present populations of fresh-water mussels in southern Illinois. Transactions, Illinois Academy of Science, 49:184–192.Google Scholar
Parmalee, P.W. 1960. Mussels from the Angel Site, Indiana. Nautilus, 74(2):70–75.Google Scholar
Parmalee, P.W. 1969. Animal remains from the Archaic Riverton, Swan Island and Robeson Hills Sites, Illinois. Appendix 1:104–113. In Winters, Howard D., The Riverton Culture. Illinois State Museum Reports of Investigations No. 13 and Illinois Archaeological Survey Monograph, No. 1.Google Scholar
Parmalee, P.W. 1988. A comparative study of late Prehistoric and Modern molluscan faunas of the Little Pigeon River System, Tennessee. American Malacological Bulletin, 6(2):165–178.Google Scholar
Parmalee, P.W., and Bogan, A.E. 1986. Molluscan remains from Aboriginal Middens at the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Site, Roane County, Tennessee. American Malacological Bulletin, 4(1):25–37.Google Scholar
Parmalee, P.W., Klippel, W.E. and Bogan, A.E. 1980. Notes on the prehistoric and present status of the naiad fauna of the Middle Cumberland River, Smith County, Tennessee. Nautilus, 94(3):93–105.Google Scholar
Parmalee, P.W., 1982. Aboriginal and modern freshwater mussel assemblages (Pelecypoda: Unionidae) from the Chickamauga Reservoir, Tennessee. Brimleyana, No. 8:75–90.Google Scholar
Patch, D.C. In press. The freshwater molluscan fauna. In: Watson, P., Marquardt, W. and Kennedy, M. (eds.), The Archaeology of the Middle Green River, Kentucky. Kent State University Press, Ohio.Google Scholar
Robison, N. 1986. An analysis and interpretation of the faunal remains from eight late Middle Woodland Owl Hollow Phase sites in Coffee, Franklin and Bedford Counties, Tennessee. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee. 390 p.Google Scholar
Starnes, L.B. and Bogan, A.E. 1988. The mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of Tennessee. American Malacological Bulletin, 6(1):19–37.Google Scholar
Starnes, L.B. 1982. Unionid Mollusca (Bivalvia) from the Little South Fork Cumberland River, with ecological and nomenclatural notes. Brimleyana, 8:101–119.Google Scholar
Stansbery, D.A. 1964. The mussel (muscle) shoals of the Tennessee River revisited. American Malacological Union, Inc. Annual Reports for 1964, p. 25–28.Google Scholar
Stansbery, D.A. 1965. The molluscan fauna. In Prufer, O.A. (ed.), The McGraw Site-A Study in Hopwellian Dynamics. Cleveland Museum of Natural History, New Series, 4(1):119–124.Google Scholar
Stansbery, D.A. 1966. Observations on the habitat distribution of the naiad Cumberlandia monodonta (Say, 1829). American Malacological Union, Annual Report, p. 29–30.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L. 1981. Notes on the microhabitats of unionid mussels in some Michigan streams. American Midland Naturalist, 106:411–415.Google Scholar
Theler, J.L. 1987. Prehistoric freshwater mussel assemblages of the Mississippi River in Southwestern Wisconsin. Nautilus, 101(3):143–150.Google Scholar
Turgeon, D.D., Bogan, A.E., Coan, E.V., Emerson, W.K., Lyons, W.G., Pratt, W.L., Roper, C.F.E., Scheltema, A., Thompson, F.G., and Williams, J.D. 1988. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. American Fisheries Society Special Publication, 16:1–277.Google Scholar
Van Der Schalie, H. 1939. Additional notes on the naiads (freshwater mussels) of the lower Tennessee River. American Midland Naturalist, 22 (2):452–457.Google Scholar
Van Der Schalie, H. 1973. The mollusks of the Duck River drainage in central Tennessee. Sterkiana, No. 52:45–55.Google Scholar
Van Der Schalie, H., and Parmalee, P.W. 1960. Animal remains from the Etowah Site, Mound C, Bartow County, Georgia. Florida Anthropologist, 13(2–3):37–54.Google Scholar
Van Der Schalie, H., and Van Der Schalie, A. 1950. The mussels of the Mississippi River. American Midland Naturalist, 44(2): 448–466.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, A.P., Overstreet, D.F. and Theler, J.L. 1980. Archaeological recovery at 11-RI337, an early Middle Woodland shell midden in East Moline, Illinois. The Wisconsin Archeologist, 61(2):125–256.Google Scholar
Vannotte, R.L., Minshall, G.W., Cummins, K.W., Sedell, J.R. and Cushing, C.E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37(1)130–137.Google Scholar
Warren, R.E. 1975. Prehistoric Unionacea (freshwater mussel) utilization at the Widows Creek Site (1JA305), Northeast Alabama. , University of Nebraska, Lincoln. 245 p.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.B. and Clark, H.W. 1914. The mussels of the Cumberland River and its tributaries. Report, United States Fish Commission, United States Bureau of Fisheries Document No. 781:1–67.Google Scholar