Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T16:54:51.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Nature of the Fossil Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Susan Kidwell
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago 5734 South Ellis Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60637
J. John Sepkoski Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago 5734 South Ellis Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60637
Get access

Extract

The term “fossil record” is used in two ways: either the totality of fossils preserved in all rocks or the sum of human knowledge of those fossils. In either case, the term carries the connotation also of the geologic context of the fossils–their distribution in time and space and their relationship to the enclosing rock. One of the primary scientific interests in the fossil record is learning about the history of life and the processes of large-scale transformation, or evolution, in the forms, diversities, and biological interactions of life.

Type
Organizing the Data
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Briggs, D. E. G., 1991. Extraordinary fossils. American Scientist 79: 130141.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., 1993. Fossil biomolecules. The Biochemist 15(4): 812.Google Scholar
Foote, M. and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1999. Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record. Nature 398: 415417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foote, M., 1996. On the probability of ancestors in the fossil record. Paleobiology 22: 141151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J., 1981. The titular bishop of Titiopolis. Natural History (May 1981), p. 2024. [on Steno and organic origin of fossils and law of superposition] Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., 1983. False premise, good science. Natural History (October 1983), p. 2026. [on Kelvin and calibrating the age of the earth] Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Cox, A. V., Llewellyn, P. G., Pickton, C. A. G., Smith, A. G., and Walters, R., 1982. A Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge University Press, 131 p.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Armstrong, R. L., Cox, A. V., Craig, L. E., Smith, A. G., and Smith, D. G., 1990. A Geologic Time Scale 1989. Cambridge University Press, 263 p.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., Flessa, K. W., 1995. The quality of the fossil record; populations, species, and communities. Annual Review Ecology Systematics 26: 269299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothero, D. R., 1990. Interpreting the Stratigraphic Record. New York: Freeman, 410 p.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. and Schwab, F., 1996. Sedimentary Geology, An Introduction to Sedimentary Rocks and Stratigraphy. New York: Freeman, 575 p.Google Scholar
Raup, D. R., 1976. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: a tabulation. Paleobiology 2: 279288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, D. R., 1991. A kill curve for Phanerozoic marine species. Paleobiology 17: 3748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1997. Biodiversity: past, present, and future. Journal of Paleontology 71: 533539. [reprinted in this volume] CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. and Hulver, M. L., 1985. An atlas of Phanerozoic clade diversity diagrams, p. 1139. In Valentine, J. W. (ed.), Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns, Profiles in Macroevolution. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, H., 1997. Ancient DNA from Pleistocene fossils: preservation, recovery, and utility of ancient genetic information for Quaternary research. Quarternary Science Reviews 16: 11451161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, K., 1963. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the Gulf Coast of the United States. Univeristy of Texas Publications, no. 6304. 373 p.Google Scholar