Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T16:53:23.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecules and Evolutionary History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Allen G. Collins
Allen G. Collins*
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, California 94720
Get access

Extract

Paleontologists learn and tell the history of life; it is our job. You might suspect that paleontologists spend most of their time studying fossils. While fossils are an important source of information for the paleontologist, other types of evidence can also tell us about biological history. For instance, the rocks themselves provide important information, especially about past climates. It makes perfect sense that organisms are more easily understood if you know the environment in which they lived. A third important source of information is all around us. The organisms alive today are the current products of the various processes of evolution that have been at work for more than three billion years. Organisms carry the legacy of their histories with them, in their anatomy, behavior, and genes. By studying and comparing living organisms, we learn about the past. Advances in technology have made the abundant historical information contained in biological molecules, chiefly genes and their RNA and protein products, easier to obtain. Thus, it is not too surprising to see today's paleontologist setting about his or her business with a rock hammer in one hand and a pipettor in the other.

Type
Evidence for Evolution
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 9: Evolution: Investigating the Evidence , 1999 , pp. 241 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ayala, F. J. 1997. Vagaries of the molecular clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94:7776–7783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayala, F. J., Rzhetsky, A., and Ayala, F. J. 1998. Origin of the metazoan phyla: molecular clocks confirm paleontological estimates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95:606–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldauf, S. L., and Palmer, J. D. 1993. Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 90:11558–11562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borchiellini, C., Boury-Esnault, N., Vacelet, J., and Le Parco, Y. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of the Hsp70 sequences reveals the monophyly of Metazoa and specific phylogenetic relationships between animals and fungi. Molecular biology and Evolution, 15:647–655.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D., and McIlroy, D. 1998. Neonereites uniserialis from c. 600 Ma year old rocks in western Scotland and the emergence of animals. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 155:5–12.Google Scholar
Bromham, L., Rambaut, A., Fortey, R., Cooper, A., and Penny, D. 1998. Testing the Cambrian explosion hypothesis by using a molecular dating technique. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95:12386–12389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. R., and Doolittle, W. F. 1995. Root of the universal tree of life based on ancient aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase gene duplications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 92:2441–2445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CoBabe, E.A., and Ptak, A. (in press a) In situ lipids in invertebrate skeletons: Evidence of diet in modern invertebrates. Paleobiology.Google Scholar
CoBabe, E.A. (in press b) Chemosynthesis and chemosymbiosis in the fossil record: Detecting unusual communities using isotope geochemistry. Paleontological Society Short Course: Isotopes in Paleobiology.Google Scholar
Crick, F. H. C. 1958. On protein synthesis, p. 138–163. In Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, no. 12. The Biological Replication of Macromolecules. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gao, F., Bailes, E., Robertson, D. L., Chen, Y., Rodenberg, C. M., Michael, S. F., Cummins, L. B., Arthur, L. O., Peeters, M., Shaw, G. M., Sharp, P. M., and Hahn, B. H. 1999. Origin of HIV-1 in the chimpanzee Pan troglodytes troglodytes. Nature 397:436–441.Google Scholar
Gehling, J. G., and Rigby, J. K. 1997. Long expected sponges from the Neoproterozoic Ediacara fauna of South Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 70(2): 185–195.Google Scholar
Gogarten, J. P., Kibak, H., Dittrich, P., Taiz, L., Bowman, E., Bowman, M., Manolsen, M. F., Poole, R. J., Date, T., Oshima, T., Konisha, T., Denda, K., and Yoshida, M. 1989. Evolution of vacuolar H+-ATPase: Implications for the origin of eucaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 86:6661–6665.Google Scholar
Goodman, M., Porter, C. A., Czelusniak, J., Page, S. L., Schneider, H., Shoshani, J., Gunnell, G. and Groves, C. P. 1998. Toward a phylogenetic classification of primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 9:585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gribaldo, S. and Cammarano, P. 1998. The root of the universal tree of life inferred from anciently duplicated genes encoding components of the protein-targeting machinery. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 47:508–516.Google Scholar
Gu, X. 1998. Early metazoan divergence was about 830 million years ago. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 47:369–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, D. M., Bull, J. J., White, M. E., Badgett, M. R., and Molineux, I. J. 1992. Experimental phylogenetics: Generation of a known phylogeny. Science, 255:589–592.Google Scholar
Hillis, D. M., Huelsenbeck, J. P., and Cunningham, C. W. 1994. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science, 264:671–677.Google Scholar
Hillis, D. M., Moritz, C., and Mable, B. K. 1996b. Molecular Systematics, Second Edition. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, 655 p.Google Scholar
Iwabe, N., Kuma, K., Hasegawa, M., Osawa, S., and Myata, T. 1989. Evolutionary relationship of the archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 86:9335–9359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawson, F. S., Charlebois, R. L., and Dillon, J. A. R. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of carbomoyl-phosphate genes: Evolution involving multiple gene duplications, gene fusions, and insertions and deletions of surrounding sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13:970–977.Google Scholar
Li, C.-W., Chen, J.-Y., and Hua, T.-E. 1998. Precambrian sponges with cellular structures. Science, 279:879–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, C. P. 1998. Phylogenetic Systematics, Biogeography and Diversification Patterns in Cowries. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, 223 p.Google Scholar
Nikoh, N., Iwabe, N., Kuma, K.-I., Ohno, M., Sugiyama, T., Watanabe, Y., Yasui, K., Zhang, S.-C., Hori, K., Shimura, Y., and Miyata, T. An estimate of divergence time of Parazoa and Eumetazoa and that of Cephalochordata and Vertebrata by aldolase and triose phosphate isomerase clocks. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 45:97–106.Google Scholar
Noro, M., Masuda, R., Dubrovo, I. A., Yoshida, M. C., and Kato, M. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic inference of the Woolly Mammoth Mammuthus primigenius, based on complete sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome b and 12S ribosomal RNA genes. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 46:314–326.Google Scholar
Ozawa, T., Hayashi, S., and Mikhelson, V. M. 1997. Phylogenetic position of mammoth and stellar's sea cow within Tethytheria demonstrated by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 44:406–413.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B. 1982. A molecular-clock date for the origin of the animal phyla. Lethaia 15:199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, P. O., Hinkle, G., Sogin, M. L., and Stickel, S. K. 1993. Monophyletic origins of the Metazoa: an evolutionary link with fungi. Science, 260:340–342.Google Scholar
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., and Wheelis, M. L. 1990. Towards a natural system of organisms: Proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 87:4576–4579.Google Scholar
Wray, G., Levinton, A., and Shapiro, L. H. 1996. Molecular evidence for deep Precambrian divergences among metazoan phyla. Science 274:568–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerkandl, E., and Pauling, L. 1962. Molecular disease, evolution and genic heterogeneity, p. 189–225. In Kasha, M., and Pullman, B. (eds.), Horizons in Biochemistry. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Zuckerkandl, E., and Pauling, L. 1965. Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. Journal of Theoretical Biology 8:357–366.Google Scholar