Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:59:24.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human and Not-so-Human Footprint Images on the Rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

William F. Tanner*
Affiliation:
Geology Department, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306
Get access

Abstract

Human footprints, and similar images, have been described from rocks on various continents: North and South America, Europe, Asia and Africa; on rocks of any age, including Precambrian metamorphics.

Many of these images are carved. The Precambrian “footprints” of North Georgia were carved on the modern rock surface, but are not within the rock. Weathering rates are so high that they can be only some hundreds of years old. The instep and all of the toes were sharply defined, as is characteristic of carvings. The number of toes was not constant from print to print. The Cretaceous “footprints” of Missouri were also sharply-defined carvings, although they appeared on the bedding plane. There are no “jumping” indentations at either heel or toe, even though the two prints (side by side) were completely isolated on a wide smooth surface. The Precambrian “footprints” of Sweden likewise are carvings, on the modern weathering surface, with sharply-detailed outlines.

Many more of these images are not footprints of any animal at all. They vary in size, shape, and depth of indentation. Just as carved images typically show too much sharp detail, these images do not show any detail, rarely resemble the correct shape, and commonly are not consistent in size. The Cretaceous “footprints” of central Texas are a hodge-podge of random markings of various kinds, the large majority of which were formed by differential erosion of a non-homogenous limestone. Whereas dinosaur footprints in the same rocks show systematic patterns and sequences, the so-called “human footprints” are erratic natural markings and excavations.

A tiny minority of these images was made by the feet of human or primitive humanoid creatures. These genuine footprints show recognizable patterns and sequences, but not much detail; occur on bedding planes; and date only from Pleistocene or late Pliocene rocks.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Acerrano, A. 1982. How wildlife leaves its mark. National Wildlife, volume 20, number 6, p. 1317.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS. 1938. Human-like tracks in stone are riddle to scientists. Science News Letter, 29 Oc., p. 278279.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS. 1981. Ancient man in Northern Europe: Functional Photography, volume 16, number 6, p. 20.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS. 1982. Both beauty and perfection. Ogonyok; Moscow, U.S.S.R; 20 March 1982; No. 12 for 1982 (No. 2853); p. 7; in Russian.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS. 1982. Oldest human bones found. Geotimes, volume 27, number 9, p. 29.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. S. (editor). 1982. Lost empires, living tribes. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C., 402 p.Google Scholar
Blatt, H. 1982. Sedimentary Petrology. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 564 p.Google Scholar
Calkins, C. C. 1982. Mysteries of the unexplained. Reader's Digest Assoc, Pleasantville, N.Y., 320 p.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W. (editor). 1975. The study of trace fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York, 562 p.Google Scholar
Hay, R. L., and Leakey, M. D. 1982. The fossil footprints of Laetoli. Scientific American, volume 246, number 2, p. 5057.Google Scholar
Kirkland, F., and Newcomb, W. W. Jr. 1942. The rock art of Texas Indians. Bulletin Texas Archeological Society, No. 14, 23 p.Google Scholar
Mossman, D. J., and Sarjeant, W. A. S. 1983. The footprints of extinct animals. Scientific American, volume 248, p. 7485.Google Scholar
Muldoon, R. 1982. Scientists find 4 million-year-old bones of ancient man in Ethiopia. National Science Foundation press release, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Perryman, M. 1950. Hunting petroglyphs in Northern Georgia. Early Georgia, volume 1, Univ. Georgia Press, Athens, Ga., p. 617.Google Scholar
Schaafsma, P. 1980. Indian rock art of the Southwest. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 379 p.Google Scholar
Schoolcraft, H. 1822. Remarks on the prints of human feet, observed in the secondary limestone of the Mississippi Valley: American Journal of Science, volume 5, p. 223230.Google Scholar
Tanner, W. F. 1982. (Untitled). Functional Photography, vol. 17 no. 1, p. 20 (This is a discussion of footprint carvings in Sweden).Google Scholar
Thompson, G. A. 1814. Geographical and historical dictionary of America and the West Indies, containing an entire translation of the Spanish work of Colonel Don Antonio de Alcedo, with large additions and compilations from modern voyages and travels. In five volumes. Published by Carpenter and Son, Old Bond Street, London, and five other publishers. U.S. Geological Survey Library no. 24367.Google Scholar