Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:59:38.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxon characteristics that promote survivorship through the Permian–Triassic interval: transition from the Paleozoic to the Mesozoic brachiopod fauna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Lindsey R. Leighton  and
Chris L. Schneider
Lindsey R. Leighton
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences and Allison Center for Marine Research, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182-1020. E-mail: [email protected]
Chris L. Schneider
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs Colorado 80903. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Examination of organismal characteristics which promote survivorship through both background and mass extinctions may reveal general ecological principles potentially critical to modern conservation efforts. This study explores survivorship of brachiopods, a highly diverse and abundant Paleozoic clade, through the mid-Permian to mid-Triassic interval, which includes the greatest mass extinction in the history of metazoan life. This interval of time separates two of the major Phanerozoic evolutionary faunas. In this regard, survivorship across any one extinction during the interval would not have been relevant if the survivor went extinct shortly after the extinction event; surviving background extinction is as important as surviving a mass extinction. Similarly, taxa that survived but failed to rediversify also were not major elements of the Mesozoic evolutionary fauna. Thus, the analysis aims to analyze survivorship not just across a single extinction but across the entire mid-Permian to mid-Triassic; only survivors through the entire interval can be the ancestors of the Mesozoic clades.

Fewer brachiopod genera survived the interval than did brachiopod clades, suggesting that pseudoextinction or insufficient sampling could be a problem in analyzing these extinctions; thus, survivorship analysis should be conducted at the clade level. Nine characteristics were examined for generic representatives of 20 North American brachiopod clades, five of which survived both Permian extinctions and the subsequent earliest Triassic transitional interval. Characteristics include both those that operate on global scales and those that operate on the higher-resolution scales of individuals and populations.

Survivors were significantly smaller and occurred less frequently than victims. Mean diversity of communities in which survivors were present was significantly greater. The finding that rare taxa belonging to high-diversity communities were more likely to survive runs counter to traditional predictions. However, these results are consistent with recent studies suggesting that higher diversity within a trophic level may create a buffer, as surviving taxa quickly occupy the vacant niche space of the victims. As size, abundance, and community diversity are all statistically related, the small size of survivors may be an artifact of reduced biovolume per taxon in a diverse community.

No significant relationship exists between global-scale processes and survivorship of brachiopods through the mid-Permian to mid-Triassic. The results suggest that ecological processes can strongly influence global extinction patterns.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , Winter 2008 , pp. 65 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aberhan, M. 1994. Guild-structure and evolution of Mesozoic benthic shelf communities. Palaios 9:516–545.Google Scholar
Alvarez, F., and Rong, J.-Y. 2002. Athyridida. Pp. 1475–1614in Williams, A. et al. Brachiopoda 4 (revised). Part H of Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Alvarez, F., Rong, J., and Boucot, A. J. 1998. The classification of athyridid brachiopods. Journal of Paleontology 72:827–855.Google Scholar
Anstey, R. L. 1978. Taxonomic survivorship and morphologic complexity in Paleozoic bryozoan genera. Paleobiology 4:407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1990. Late Paleozoic provinciality in the marine realm. In McKerrow, W. S. and Scotese, C. R., eds. Palaeozoic palaeogeography and biogeography. Geological Society of London Memoir 12:307–333.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K., Knoll, A. H., and Wang, S. C. 2004. Origination, extinction, and mass depletions of marine diversity. Paleobiology 30:522–542.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist 124:255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. L., Johnson, J. G., Gourvennec, R., and Hong-Fei, H. 1994. A revised classification of the spiriferid brachiopods. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 63:327–374.Google Scholar
Carter, J. L., Johnson, J. G., Gourvennec, R., and Hong-Fei, H. 2006. Spiriferida. Pp. 1689–1937in Williams, A. et al. Brachiopoda 5 (revised). Part H of Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Chen, Z-Q., Kaiho, K., and George, A. 2005a. Survival strategies of brachiopod faunas from the end-Permian mass extinction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 224:232–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z-Q., Kaiho, K., and George, A. 2005b. Early Triassic recovery of the brachiopod faunas from the end-Permian mass extinction: a global review. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 224:270–290.Google Scholar
Droser, M. L., Bottjer, D. J., and Sheehan, P. M. 1997. Evaluating the ecological architecture of major events in the Phanerozoic history of marine invertebrate life. Geology 25:167–170.Google Scholar
Ebenman, B., Law, R., and Borrvall, C. 2004. Community viability analysis: the response of ecological communities to species loss. Ecology 85:2591–2600.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 1993. The great Paleozoic crisis: life and death in the Permian. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 1998. The end and the beginning: recoveries from mass extinctions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:344–349.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H., Bowring, S. A., and Yugan, J. 2002. End-Permian mass extinctions: a review. In Koeberl, C. and MacLoed, K. G., eds. Catastrophic events and mass extinctions. Geological Society of America Special Paper 356:363–383.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2007. Extinction and quiescence in marine animal genera. Paleobiology 33:261–272.Google Scholar
Foote, M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1999. Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record. Nature 398:415–417.Google Scholar
Fox, J. W., and Olsen, E. 2000. Food web structure and the strength of transient indirect effects. Oikos 90:219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraiser, M. L., and Bottjer, D. J. 2005. The non-actualistic Early Triassic gastropod fauna; a case study of the Lower Triassic Sinbad Limestone Member. Palaios 19:259–275.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., Berndt, R., Scheuer, T., and Gahr, M. 2001. Comparative ecological analysis of Toarcian (Lower Jurassic) benthic faunas from southern France and east-central Spain. Lethaia 34:169–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J. 1994. Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Gaston, K. J., and Lawton, J. H. 1990. Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance. Oikos 58:329–335.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1991. Why was there a delayed radiation after the end-Palaeozoic extinctions? Historical Biology 5:257–262.Google Scholar
Hallam, A., and Wignall, P. B. 1997. Mass extinctions and their aftermath. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, D. A., and Rong, J-Y. 2001. Palaeozoic brachiopod extinctions, survival and recovery; patterns within the rhynchonelliformeans. Geology Journal 36:317–328.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1986. Background and mass extinctions; the alternation of macroevolutionary regimes. Science 231:129–133.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1987. Heritability at the species level; analysis of geographic ranges of Cretaceous mollusks. Science 238:360–363.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 2001. Lessons from the past: evolutionary impacts of mass extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:5393–5398.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Raup, D. M. 1995. Selectivity of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinctions. Science 268:389–391.Google Scholar
Knoll, A. H., Bambach, R. K., Canfield, D. E., and Grotzinger, J. P. 1996. Comparative earth history and Late Permian mass extinction. Science 273:452–457.Google Scholar
Lee, D. E., Mackinnon, D. I., Smirnova, T. N., Baker, P. G., Jin, Y-G., and Sun, D-L. 2006. Terebratulida. Pp. 1965–2250in Williams, A. et al. Brachiopoda 5 (revised). Part H of Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Lockwood, R. 2004. The K/T event and infaunality: morphological and ecological patterns of extinction and recovery in veneroid bivalves. Paleobiology 30:507–521.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
May, R. M. 1972. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238:413–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, M., and Bohanak, A. J. 1995. Non-selectivity in extinction of bivalves in the Late Cretaceous of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8:779–794.Google Scholar
McGhee, G. R., Sheehan, P. M., Bottjer, D. J., and Droser, M. L. 2004. Ecological ranking of Phanerozoic biodiversity crises; ecological and taxonomic severities are decoupled. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 211:289–297.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1995. Extinction selectivity among lower taxa; gradational patterns and rarefaction error in extinction estimates. Paleobiology 21:300–313.Google Scholar
Olszewski, T. D., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 2001. Measuring recurrence of marine biotic gradients: a case study from the Pennsylvanian-Permian Midcontinent. Palaios 16:444–460.Google Scholar
Payne, J. L. 2005. Evolutionary dynamics of gastropod size across the end-Permian extinction. Paleobiology 31:269–290.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. 1979. Complexity and stability: another look at MacArthur's original hypothesis. Oikos 33:351–357.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. E., and McKinney, M. L. 1993. Ecosystem organization and extinction dynamics. Palaios 8:202–212.Google Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D. 2006. Extinction cascades and catastrophe in ancient food webs. Paleobiology 32:1–19.Google Scholar
Savage, N. M., Mancenido, M. O., Owen, E. F., Carlson, S. J., Grant, R. E., Dagys, A. S., and Sun, D.-L. 2002. Rhynchonellida. Pp. 1027–1376in Williams, A. et al. Brachiopoda 4 (revised). Part H of Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Schubert, J. K., and Bottjer, D. J. 1995. Aftermath of the Permian-Triassic mass extinction event; paleoecology of Lower Triassic carbonates in the Western USA. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 116:1–39.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1981. A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology 7:36–53.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10:246–267.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1996. Competition in macroevolution: the double wedge revisited. Pp. 211–255in Jablonski, D., Erwin, D., and Lipps, J. H., eds. Evolutionary paleobiology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Bambach, R. K., Raup, D. M., and Valentine, J. W. 1981. Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record. Nature 293:435–437.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., McKinney, F. K., and Lidgard, S. 2000. Competitive displacement among post-Paleozoic cyclostome and cheilostome bryozoans. Paleobiology 26:7–18.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. S., and Wilk, M. B. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611.Google Scholar
Shen, S., and Shi, G. 1996. Diversity and extinction patterns of Permian brachiopods of South China. Historical Biology 12:93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. B., Gale, A. S., and Monks, N. E. A. 2001. Sea-level change and rock-record bias in the Cretaceous. Paleobiology 27:241–253.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. T., and Roy, K. 2006. Selectivity during background extinction: Plio-Pleistocene scallops in California. Paleobiology 32:408–416.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., and Yang, X. 1994. A double mass extinction at the end of the Paleozoic era. Science 266:1340–1344.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. D. 2005. Extinction and the fossil record. Pp. 1–34in Taylor, P. D., ed. Extinctions in the history of life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tomasovych, A. 2006. Brachiopod and bivalve ecology in the Late Triassic; onshore-offshore replacements caused by variations in sediment and nutrient supply. Palaios 21:344–368.Google Scholar
Wagner, P. J., Kosnik, M. A., and Lidgard, S. 2006. Abundance distributions imply elevated complexity of post-Paleozoic marine ecosystems. Science 314:1289–1292.Google Scholar
Wignall, P. B., and Twitchett, R. J. 1996. Oceanic anoxia and the end Permian mass extinction. Science 272:1155–1158.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Brunton, C. H. C., and Carlson, S. J. 1999–2006. Brachiopoda (revised). Part H ofMoore, R. C., ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar