Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T23:55:28.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stereotypy of predatory boring behavior of Pleistocene naticid gastropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Carl J. Berg Jr.  and
Stuart Nishenko
Carl J. Berg Jr.
Affiliation:
Dept. Biology, City College of New York and Dept. of Animal Behavior, Am. Mus. of Nat. Hist.; New York, New York 10031
Stuart Nishenko
Affiliation:
Dept. Earth and Planetary Sci., City College of New York; New York, New York 10031
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantitative systems for describing naticid borehole position in bivalve and gastropod prey are presented. Pleistocene nassariid prey were bored at 53% of the distance up the shell and 8° to the right of the columella. A similar stereotyped position was found for Recent prey. The longitudinal shell axis and the aperture of the gastropod shell are proposed as primary cues in orienting prey for boring.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , Summer 1975 , pp. 258 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ansell, A. D. 1960. Observations on predation of Venus striatula (Da Costa) by Natica alderi (Forbes). Proc. Malacol. Soc. Lond. 34:157–164.Google Scholar
Batschelet, E. 1965. Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms. 57 pp. Am. Inst. Biol. Sci. Wash., D.C.Google Scholar
Carriker, M. R. 1961. Comparative functional morphology of boring mechanisms in gastropods. Am. Zool. 1:263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriker, M. R., and Yochelson, E. L. 1968. Recent gastropod boreholes and Ordovician borings. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 593-B:1–26.Google Scholar
Carter, R. M. 1967. On the biology and paleontology of some predators of bivalved mollusks. Paleogeogr., Paleoclimatol., Paleoecol. 4:29–65.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., and Graham, A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. 755 pp. R. Soc.; Lond.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1967. Paleoethology and fossil drilling gastropods. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 70:33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siler, W. L. 1963. Feeding habits of some Eocene carnivorous gastropods. Tex. J. Sci. 2:213–218.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1969. The fossil record of shell boring by snails. Am. Zool. 9:725–734.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. D. 1970. Feeding habits of predatory gastropods in a Tertiary (Eocene) molluscan assemblage from the Paris Basin. Palaeontology. 13:254–260.Google Scholar
Ziegelmeier, E. 1954. Beobachtungen uber den Nahrungserwerb bei der Naticide Lunatia nitida Donovan (Gastropoda Prosobranchia). Helgoland. Wiss. Meeresunters. 5:1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar