Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:34:06.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Size distributions of living and fossil primate faunas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

John G. Fleagle
John G. Fleagle*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, State University of New York; Stony Brook, New York 11794
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Size distributions, based on molar length, are presented for various groups of living and fossil primates. I examine (1) the extent to which particular taxonomic groups with distinctive morphological and behavioral attributes are characterized by distinctive size ranges or distributions and (2) the way in which size ranges and distributions are affected by the presence or absence of other primates within the same geographical area and time. Distinctive behavioral and ecological “adaptive zones” are characterized by distinctive size ranges and behavioral and morphological parallelism or convergence among living and fossil primate taxa usually results in similar size distributions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Winter 1978 , pp. 67 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andrews, P. and Groves, C. P. 1976. Gibbons and brachiation. Gibbon and Siamang. 4:167–218.Google Scholar
Beecher, R. M. 1977. Functional significance of the mandibular symphysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 47:117.Google Scholar
Bown, T. M. 1974. Notes on some early Eocene anaptomorphine primates. Contrib. Geol. Univ. Wyoming. 13:19–26.Google Scholar
Bown, T. M. and Rose, K. D. 1976. New early Tertiary primates and a reappraisal of some Plesiadapiformes. Folia Primatol. 26:109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartmill, M. 1972. Arboreal adaptations and the origin of the order Primates. Pp. 97–122. In: Tuttle, R., ed. The Functional and Evolutionary Biology of Primates. Aldine-Atherton; Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Cartmill, M. 1974. Rethinking primate origins. Science. 184:436–443.Google Scholar
Cartmill, M. 1975a. Primate Origins. 39 pp. Burgess; Minneapolis, Minn.Google Scholar
Cartmill, M. 1975b. Strepsirhine basicranial structures and affinities of Cheirogaleidae. Pp. 313–354. In: Luckett, W. P. and Szalay, F. S., eds. Phylogeny of the Primates. 438 pp. Plenum; New York.Google Scholar
Coimbra-Filho, A. F. and Mittermeier, R. A. 1976. Exudate-eating and tree-gouging in marmosets. Nature. 262:630.Google Scholar
Conroy, G. C. 1976. Primate postcranial remains from the Oligocene of Egypt. Contrib. Primatol. 8:1–134. Karger; Basel.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1887. The Origin of the Fittest. D. Appleton and Co.; New York.Google Scholar
Déperét, C. 1909. The Transformations of the Animal World. D. Appleton and Co.; New York.Google Scholar
Erikson, G. E. 1963. Brachiation in New World monkeys and in anthropoid apes. Symp. Zool. Soc. London. 10:135–164.Google Scholar
Fleagle, J. G., Simons, E. L., and Conroy, G. C. 1975. Ape limb bone from the Oligocene of Egypt. Science. 189:135–137.Google Scholar
Gazin, C. L. 1958. A review of the middle and upper Eocene primates of North America. Smithson. Misc. Coll. 136:1–122.Google Scholar
Gazin, C. L. 1962. A further study of the lower Eocene mammalian faunas of southwestern Wyoming. Smithson. Misc. Coll. 144:1–98.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1973. Anatomy of the temporal bone in the Oligocene anthropoid Apidium and the origin of Anthropoidea. Folia Primatol. 19:329–337.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1975. A new genus of Adapidae (Mammalia, Primates) from the Late Eocene of Southern France, and its significance for the origin of higher primates. Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 24(19):163–170.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1976. Cranial anatomy and evolution of early Tertiary Plesiadapidae (Mammalia, Primates). Pap. Paleontol. 15. Mus. of Paleontol. Univ. Mich.; Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41:587–640.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1971. Muscular mechanics and the ontogeny of swimming in scallops. Paleontology. 14:61–94.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1975. On the scaling of tooth size in mammals. Am. Zool. 15:351–362.Google Scholar
Gregory, W. K. 1920. On the structure and relations of Notharctus, an American Eocene primate. Mem. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. (NS) 3(2):49–243.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D. 1971. The mammalian fauna of the Lost Cabin Member, Wind River Formation (Lower Eocene) of Wyoming. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 43:47–113.Google Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. 1974. A new genus of late Oligocene monkey (Cebidae, Platyrrhini) with notes on postorbital closure and platyrrhine evolution. Folia Primatol. 21:1–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hladik, A., and Hladik, C. M. 1969. Rapports trophiques entre végétation et primates dans la Forêt de Barro-Colorado (Panama). La Terre et la Vie. 23:25–117.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. and MacArthur, R. H. 1959. A theoretical ecological model of size distributions among species of animals. Am. Nat. 93:117–125.Google Scholar
Kay, R. F. 1975. The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 43:195–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, R. F.In Press. Molar structure and diet in extant Cercopithecidae. In: Butler, P. and Joysey, K., eds. Proc. IVth Int. Symp. on Dent. Morphol.Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Kay, R. F. and Cartmill, M. 1977. Cranial morphology and adaptations of Palaechthon nacimienti: and other Paromomyidae (Plesiadapoidea, ? Primates), with a description of a new genus and species. J. Hum. Evol. 6:19–53.Google Scholar
Kinzey, W. G., Rosenberger, A. L. and Ramirez, M. 1975. Vertical clinging and leaping in a neotropical anthropoid. Nature. 255:327–328.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. 1953. On the variation and population dynamics of fossil and recent mammal populations. Acta. Zool. Fennica. 76:1–112.Google Scholar
Leutenegger, W. 1971. Metric variability of the postcanine dentition in colobus monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 35:91–100.Google Scholar
Martin, R. D. 1968. Towards a new definition of primates. Man. 3:377–401.Google Scholar
Martin, R. D. 1972. Adaptive radiation and behavior of the Malagasy lemurs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B. 264:295–352.Google ScholarPubMed
Newell, N. D. 1949. Phyletic size increase—an important trend illustrated by fossil invertbrates. Evolution. 3:103–124.Google Scholar
Orlosky, F. 1973. Comparative dental morphology of extant and extinct Cebidae. Ph.D. thesis.Univ. Washington. Univ. Microfilms; Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Radinsky, L. 1973. Aegyptopithecus endocast: Oldest record of a pongid brain. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 39:239–248.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. 1957. The species of Notharctus from the middle Eocene. Postilla. 28:1–27.Google Scholar
Rose, K. D. 1975. The Carpolestidae. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 147:1–74.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1972. How Animals Work. Cambridge University Press; 114 pp.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1969. Models of optimal size for solitary predators. Am. Nat. 103:277–313.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2:369–404.Google Scholar
Simons, E. L. 1962. Two new primate species from the African Oligocene. Postilla. 64:1–12.Google Scholar
Simons, E. L. 1965. New fossil apes from Egypt and the initial differentiation of Hominoidea. Nature. 205:135–139.Google Scholar
Simons, E. L. 1967. The earliest apes. Sci. Am. 217(6):28–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, E. L. 1972. Primate Evolution. 322 pp. Macmillan; New York.Google Scholar
Simons, E. L. 1974. Parapithecus grangeri (Parapithecidae, Old World Higher Primates): New species from the Oligocene of Egypt and the initial differentiation of Cercopithecoidea. Postilla. 166:1–12.Google Scholar
Simons, E. L. and Fleagle, J. G. 1973. The history of extinct gibbon-like primates. Gibbon and Siamang. 2:121–148.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1937. The Fort Union of the Crazy Mountain Field, Montana, and its mammalian faunas. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 169:1–277.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1940. Studies on the earliest primates. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 77:185–212.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1967. The Tertiary lorisiform primates of Africa. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 136:39–62.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1973. An explanation for Cope's Rule. Evolution. 27:1–26.Google Scholar
Swindler, D. R. and Orlosky, F. J. 1974. Metric and morphological variability in the dentition of colobine monkeys. J. Hum. Evol. 3:135–160.Google Scholar
Swindler, D. R., Gavin, J. A., and Turna, W. M. 1963. Molar tooth size variables in African monkeys. Hum. Biol. 35:104–122.Google Scholar
Szalay, F. S. 1969. Mixodectidae, Microsyopidae, and the insectivore-primate transition. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 140:193–330.Google Scholar
Szalay, F. S. 1973. New Paleocene primates and a diagnosis of the new suborder Paromomyiformes. Folia Primatol. 19:73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalay, F. S. 1975. Basicranial evidence in primate phylogeny. Pp. 91–126. In Luckett, W. P. and Szalay, F. S., eds. Phylogeny of the Primates. 438 pp. Plenum; New York.Google Scholar
Szalay, F. S. 1976. Systematics of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates): Taxonomy, phylogeny, and adaptations. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 156(3):159–449.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I. 1973a. Cranial anatomy of Archaeolemurinae (Lemuroidea: Primates). Anthropol. Pap. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 52(1):1–110.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I. 1973b. Subfossil lemurs and the “adaptive radiation” of the Malagasy lemurs. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Ser. II. 35:314–324.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1971. Adaptive zones and the orders of mammals. Evolution. 25:420–428.Google Scholar
Walker, A. C. 1974. Locomotor adaptations in past and present prosimian primates. Pp. 349–382. In: Jenkins, F. A. Jr., ed. Primate Locomotion. 390 pp. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar