Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:46:40.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional and environmental variation in escalatory ecological trends during the Jurassic: a western Tethys hotspot for escalation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

Pedro M. Monarrez ,
Martin Aberhan  and
Steven M. Holland
Pedro M. Monarrez
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2501, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]
Martin Aberhan
Affiliation:
Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Steven M. Holland
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2501, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the drivers of macroevolutionary trends through the Phanerozoic has been a central question in paleobiology. Increasingly important is understanding the regional and environmental variation of macroevolutionary patterns and how they are reflected at the global scale. Here we test the role of biotic interactions on regional ecological patterns during the Mesozoic marine revolution. We test for escalatory trends in Jurassic marine benthic macroinvertebrate ecosystems using occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database parsed by region and environment. The escalation hypothesis posits that taxonomic groups that could adapt to intense predation and bioturbation proliferated, whereas groups unable to adapt were reduced in diversity and abundance or driven to extinction. We tested this hypothesis in five regions during Jurassic stages and among four depositional environments in Europe. Few escalatory trends were detected, although at least one escalatory trend was observed in every region, with the greatest number and strongest trends observed in Europe. These trends include increases in shallow infauna and cementing epifauna and occurrences of facultatively mobile invertebrates and decreases in pedunculate, free-lying, and sessile epifauna. Within Europe, escalatory trends occur in shallow-water environments but also in deeper-water environments, where they are predicted not to occur. When regional trends are aggregated, trends in Europe drive the global signal. The results of this study suggest that while evidence of escalation is rare globally, it is plausible that escalation drove macroevolutionary patterns in Europe. Furthermore, these results underline the need to dissect global fossil data at the regional scale to understand global macroevolutionary dynamics.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , November 2017 , pp. 569 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aberhan, M., Kiessling, W., and Fürsich, F. T.. 2006. Testing the role of biological interactions in the evolution of mid-Mesozoic marine benthic ecosystems. Paleobiology 32:259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguado, R., O’Dogherty, L., and Sandoval, J.. 2008. Fertility changes in surface waters during the Aalenian (mid-Jurassic) of the western Tethys as revealed by calcareous nannofossils and carbon-cycle perturbations. Marine Micropaleontology 68:268–285.Google Scholar
Allmon, W. D., and Martin, R. E.. 2014. Seafood through time revisited: the Phanerozoic increase in marine trophic resources and its macroevolutionary consequences. Paleobiology 40:256–287.Google Scholar
Alroy, J. 2008. Dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105 (Suppl. 1):11536–11542.Google Scholar
Alroy, J 2010. The shifting balance of diversity among major marine animal groups. Science 329:1191–1194.Google Scholar
Alroy, J., Aberhan, M., Bottjer, D. J., Foote, M., Fürsich, F. T., Harries, P. J., Hendy, A. J. W., Holland, S. M., Ivany, L. C., Kiessling, W., Kosnik, M. A., Marshall, C. R., McGowan, A. J., Miller, A. I., Olszewski, T. D., Patzkowsky, M. E., Peters, S. E., Villier, L., Wagner, P. J., Bonuso, N., Borkow, P. S., Brenneis, B., Clapham, M. E., Fall, L. M., Ferguson, C. A., Hanson, V. L., Krug, A. Z., Layou, K. M., Leckey, E. H., Nürnberg, S., Powers, C. M., Sessa, J. A., Simpson, C., Tomašových, A., and Visaggi, C. C. 2008. Phanerozoic trends in the global diversity of marine invertebrates. Science 321:97–100.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1993. Seafood though time—changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology 19:372–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, P. O. 2013. Mesozoic radiolarites—accumulation as a function of sea surface fertility on Tethyan margins and in ocean basins. Sedimentology 60:292–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, M. J. 2009. The Red Queen and the court jester: species diversity and the role of biotic and abiotic factors through time. Science 323:728–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, M. J., and Emerson, B. C.. 2007. How did life become so diverse? The dynamics of diversification according to the fossil record and molecular phylogenetics. Palaeontology 50:23–40.Google Scholar
Bill, M., O’Dogherty, L., Guex, J., Baumgartner, P. O., and Masson, H.. 2001. Radiolarite ages in Alpine–Mediterranean ophiolites: constraints on the oceanic spreading and the Tethys–Atlantic connection. Geological Society of America Bulletin 113:129–143.Google Scholar
Bottjer, D. J., and Jablonski, D.. 1988. Paleoenvironmental patterns in the evolution of post-Paleozoic benthic marine invertebrates. Palaios 3:540–560.Google Scholar
Buzas, M. A., Koch, C. F., Culver, S. J., and Sohl, N. F.. 1982. On the distribution of species occurrence. Paleobiology 8:143–150.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, A. L., and Harries, P. J.. 2010. Effect of nutrient availability on marine origination rates through the Phanerozoic eon. Nature Geoscience 3:430–434.Google Scholar
Clapham, M. E. 2015. Ecological consequences of the Guadalupian extinction and its role in the brachiopod–mollusk transition. Paleobiology 41:266–279.Google Scholar
Cohen, K. M., Finney, S. C., Gibbard, P. L., and Fan, J.-X.. 2013 (updated). The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Episodes 36:199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietl, G. P. 2003. The escalation hypothesis: one long argument. Palaios 18:83–86.Google Scholar
Dietl, G. P., and Kelley, P. H.. 2002. The fossil record of predator–prey arms races: coevolution and escalation hypotheses. In M. Kowalewski and P. H. Kelley, eds. The fossil record of predation. Paleontological Society Papers 8:353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietl, G. P., and Vermeij, G. J.. 2006. Comment on “statistical independence of escalatory ecological trends in Phanerozoic marine invertebrates. Science 314:925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donovan, S. K., and Gale, A. S.. 1990. Predatory asteroids and the decline of the articulate brachiopods. Lethaia 23:77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environmental Systems Research Institute. 2016. ArcGIS desktop. ESRI, Redlands, Calif.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 2009. Climate as a driver of evolutionary change. Current Biology 19:R575–R583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. J. 1985. The paradox of the first tier: an agenda for paleobiology. Paleobiology 11:2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A. 1989. The case for sea-level change as a dominant causal factor in mass extinction of marine invertebrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 325:437–455.Google Scholar
Hallam, A 2001. A review of the broad pattern of Jurassic sea-level changes and their possible causes in the light of current knowledge. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 167:23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, L. A. 1996. Secular variation in seawater chemistry: an explanation for the coupled secular variations in the mineralogies of marine limestones and potash evaporites over the past 600 m.y. Geology 24:279–283.Google Scholar
Harper, E. M. 1991. The role of predation in the evolution of cementation in bivalves. Palaeontology 34:455–460.Google Scholar
Harper, E. M 2003. The Mesozoic marine revolution. Pp. 433–455. in P. H. Kelley, M. Kowalewski, and T. A. Hansen, eds. Predator–prey interactions in the fossil record. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Harper, E. M., and Skelton, P. W.. 1993. The Mesozoic marine revolution and epifaunal bivalves. Scripta Geologica Special Issue 2:127–153.Google Scholar
Harper, E. M., and Wharton, D. S.. 2000. Boring predation and Mesozoic articulate brachiopods. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 158:15–24.Google Scholar
Hayek, L. C., and Buzas, M. A.. 2010. Surveying natural populations, 2nd ed. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 2012. Sea-level change and the area of shallow-marine habitat: implications for marine biodiversity. Paleobiology 38:205–217.Google Scholar
Huntley, J. W., and Kowalewski, M.. 2007. Strong coupling of predation intensity and diversity in the Phanerozoic fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:15006–15010.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A.. 1993. Evolution of the naticid gastropod predator–prey system—an evaluation of the hypothesis of escalation. Palaios 8:358–375.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A.. 1996. Naticid gastropod prey selectivity through time and the hypothesis of escalation. Palaios 11:437–445.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., and Jablonski, D.. 1983. Taphonomic feedback ecological consequences of shell accumulation. Pp. 195–248. in M. J. S. Tevesz, and P. L. McCall, eds. Biotic interactions in recent and fossil benthic communities. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Liow, L. H., and Stenseth, N. C.. 2007. The rise and fall of species: implications for macroevolutionary and macroecological studies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274:2745–2752.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, T. K., Hardie, L. A., Timofeeff, M. N., and Demicco, R. V.. 2003. Secular variation in seawater chemistry and the origin of calcium chloride basinal brines. Geology 31:857–860.Google Scholar
Madin, J. S., Alroy, J., Aberhan, M., Fürsich, F. T., Kiessling, W., Kosnik, M. A., and Wagner, P. J.. 2006. Statistical independence of escalatory ecological trends in Phanerozoic marine invertebrates. Science 312:897–900.Google Scholar
Martin, R. E. 1996. Secular increase in nutrient levels through the Phanerozoic: implications for productivity, biomass, and diversity of the marine biosphere. Palaios 11:209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. E., and Quigg, A.. 2012. Evolving phytoplankton stoichiometry fueled diversification of the marine biosphere. Geosciences 2:130–146.Google Scholar
Martin, R. E., Quigg, A., and Podkovyrov, V.. 2008. Marine biodiversification in response to evolving phytoplankton stoichiometry. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 258:277–291.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P. J., Jenkins, G. B., and Benton, T. G.. 2008. A long-term association between global temperature and biodiversity, origination and extinction in the fossil record. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 275:47–53.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P. J., Bell, M. A., Benton, T. G., and McGowan, A. J.. 2012. Biodiversity tracks temperature over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:15141–15145.Google Scholar
McGhee, G. R., Clapham, M. E., Sheehan, P. M., Bottjer, D. J., and Droser, M. L.. 2013. A new ecological-severity ranking of major Phanerozoic biodiversity crises. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 370:260–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1997a. Comparative diversification dynamics among palaeocontinents during the Ordovician radiation. Geobios Mémoire Spécial 20:397–406.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I 1997b. Dissecting global diversity patterns: examples from the Ordovician radiation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:85–104.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I 2000. Conversations about Phanerozoic global diversity. Paleobiology 26(Suppl.): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. I 2003. On the importance of global diversity trends and the viability of existing paleontological data. Paleobiology 29:15–18.Google Scholar
Müller, R. D., Dutkiewicz, A., Seton, M., and Gaina, C.. 2013. Seawater chemistry driven by supercontinent assembly, breakup, and dispersal. Geology 41:907–910.Google Scholar
Nürnberg, S., and Aberhan, M.. 2015. Interdependence of specialization and biodiversity in Phanerozoic marine invertebrates. Nature. Communications 6:1–8.Google Scholar
Oji, T. 1996. Is predation intensity reduced with increasing depth? Evidence from the West Atlantic stalked crinoid Endoxocrinus parrae (gervais) and implications for the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology 22:339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. L., Truebe, S., Nützel, A., and Chang, E. T.. 2011. Local and global abundance associated with extinction risk in late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic gastropods. Paleobiology 37:616–632.Google Scholar
Payne, J. L., Heim, N. A., Knope, M. L., and McClain, C. R.. 2014. Metabolic dominance of bivalves predates brachiopod diversity decline by more than 150 million years. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 281:20133122.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E. 2008. Environmental determinants of extinction selectivity in the fossil record. Nature 454:626–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raup, D. M. 1991. The future of analytical paleobiology. In N. L. Gilinsky and P. W. Signor, eds. Analytical paleobiology. Paleontological Society Short Courses in Paleontology 4:207–216.Google Scholar
R Core Team 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
Reolid, M., Nagy, J., Rodríguez-Tovar, F. J., and Olóriz, F.. 2008. Foraminiferal assemblages as palaeoenvironmental bioindicators in Late Jurassic epicontinental platforms: relation with trophic conditions. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53:705–722.Google Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D., Angielczyk, K. D., and Hertog, R.. 2006. Comment on “statistical independence of escalatory ecological trends in Phanerozoic marine invertebrates. Science 314:925.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1978. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity I. Analysis of marine orders. Paleobiology 4:223–251.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr 1979. A kinetic model of Phanerozic taxonomic diversity II. Early Phanerozoic families and multiple equilibria. Paleobiology 5:222–251.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr 1981. A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology 7:36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozioc taxonomic diversity III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinction. Paleobiology 10:246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seton, M., Müller, R. D., Zahirovic, S., Gaina, C., Torsvik, T., Shephard, G., Talsma, A., Gurnis, M., Turner, M., Maus, S., and Chandler, M.. 2012. Global continental and ocean basin reconstructions since 200 Ma. Earth-Science Reviews 113:212–270.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1979. Biological bulldozers and the evolution of marine benthic communities. Science 203:458–461.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W 1983. Sediment-mediated biological disturbances and the evolution of marine benthos. Pp. 479–625. in M. J. S. Tevesz, and P. L. McCall, eds. Biotic interactions in recent and fossil benthic communities. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasovych, A. 2006. Brachiopod and bivalve ecology in the Late Triassic (Alps, Austria): onshore-offshore replacements caused by variations in sediment and nutrient supply. Palaios 21:344–368.Google Scholar
Tyler, C. L., Leighton, L. R., Carlson, S. J., Huntley, J. W., and Kowalewski, M.. 2013. Predation on modern and fossil brachiopods: assessing the chemical defenses and palatability. Palaios 28:724–735.Google Scholar
VanDerWal, J., Falconi, L., Januchowski, S., Shoo, L., and Storlie, C.. 2014. SDMtools: species distribution modelling tools: tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. R Package, Version 1.1–221. http://www.rforge.net/SDMTools.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology 3:245–258.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J 1987. Evolution and escalation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J 1994. The evolutionary interaction among species—selection, escalation, and coevolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:219–236.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J 2004. Nature: an economic history. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J 2008. Escalation and its role in Jurassic biotic history. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 263:3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J 2013. On escalation. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 41:1–19.Google Scholar
Vörös, A. 2005. The smooth brachiopods of the Mediterranean Jurassic: refugees or invaders? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 223:222–242.Google Scholar
Vörös, A 2010. Escalation reflected in ornamentation and diversity history of brachiopod clades during the Mesozoic marine revolution. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 291:474–480.Google Scholar
Walker, S. E., and Brett, C. E.. 2002. Post-Paleozoic patterns in marine predation: was there a Mesozoic and Cenozoic marine predatory revolution? In M. Kowalewski, and P. H. Kelley, eds. The fossil record of predation. Paleontological Society Papers 8:119–194.Google Scholar
Walker, T. D., and Valentine, J. W.. 1984. Equilibrium models of evolutionary species diversity and the number of empty niches. American Naturalist 124:887–899.Google Scholar
Wright, N., Zahirovic, S., Müller, R. D., and Seton, M.. 2013. Towards community-driven paleogeographic reconstructions: integrating open-access paleogeographic and paleobiology data with plate tectonics. Biogeosciences 10:1529–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar