Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:25:44.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reflection of deciduous forest communities in leaf litter: implications for autochthonous litter assemblages from the fossil record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Robyn J. Burnham ,
Scott L. Wing  and
Geoffrey G. Parker
Robyn J. Burnham
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Scott L. Wing
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Geoffrey G. Parker
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, P.O. Box 28, Edgewater, Maryland 21037
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To assess the degree to which forest litter reflects the source forest, three 1-ha plots of temperate deciduous forest were mapped and litter accumulating in these forests was sampled. Identity, position, and diameter of all stems 2 cm or larger diameter at breast height are known for each forest. Composition of the leaf litter is governed by two key factors: (1) abscised leaves are deposited primarily on the forest floor directly underneath the canopy that produced them, and (2) the leaf mass of a species is highly correlated with its stem cross-sectional area. These factors produce autochthonous litter samples that correspond closely in composition to the forest within a circle of canopy-height radius or less. Even relatively small litter samples (350 leaves) consistently contained all the common species in the local area. However, the rarer tree species were seldom recovered in the litter samples. Correlation coefficients for litter mass and basal area by species are typically over .80.

These observations have three important implications for interpreting autochthonous compression-fossil assemblages. First, approximate relative abundances of locally dominant and subdominant forest taxa can be obtained from relatively small samples of autochthonous compression-fossil assemblages. Second, representation of rare forest species, even in large fossil samples, will be fortuitous. For this reason, complete species lists and consistent estimates of richness cannot be derived directly from most existing samples of autochthonous compression-fossil assemblages. Third, the strong tendency for leaves to fall beneath the canopy of the tree that sheds them suggests that properly sampled autochthonous fossil leaf assemblages may yield information on crown size of individual trees and the spatial distribution of individuals and species, aspects of vegetational structure that have been thought accessible only in well-preserved “fossil forests” with standing trunks.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 30 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bonan, G. W. 1984. Demographic neighbor relations in a mixed-species deciduous forest. M.S. thesis. School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
Bongers, F., Popma, J., Meave del Castillo, J., and Carabias, J. 1988. Structure and floristic composition of the lowland rainforest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Vegetatio 74:55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, R. J. 1989. Relationships between standing vegetation and leaf litter in a paratropical forest: implications for paleobotany. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 58:5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, R. J., and Spicer, R. A. 1986. Forest litter preserved by volcanic activity at El Chichon, Mexico: a potentially accurate record of the pre-eruption vegetation. Palaios 1:158–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, R. J., and Wing, S. L. 1989. Temperate forest litter accurately reflects stand composition and structure. American Journal of Botany 76(6):159.Google Scholar
Burnham, R. J., Wing, S. L., and Parker, G. G. 1990. Plant diversity and the fossil record: how reliable are the estimates? International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Abstracts with Program:327.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. J., and Horowitz, P. 1988. Leaf litter in two southern Tasmanian creeks and its relevance to palaeobotany. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 122(2):39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, R. W. 1924. Quanitative studies of the Bridge Creek flora. American Journal of Science 5th Series 7(44):127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, R. W. 1925. A comparative study of the Bridge Creek flora and the modern redwood forest. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 349:3–23.Google Scholar
Chaney, R. W. 1938. Paleoecological interpretations of Cenozoic plants in western North America. Botanical Review 4:371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dantas, M., and Phillipson, J. 1989. Litterfall and litter nutrient content in primary and secondary Amazonian ‘terra firme’ rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5:27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMichele, W. A., and DeMaris, P. J. 1987. Structure and dynamics of a Pennsylvanian-age Lepidodendron forest: colonizers of a disturbed swamp habitat in the Herin (no. 6) coal of Illinois. Palaios 2:146–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMichele, W. A., and Nelson, W. J. 1989. Small-scale spatial heterogeneity in Pennsylvanian-age vegetation from the roof shale of the Springfield coal (Illinois Basin). Palaios 4:276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMichele, W. A., and Phillips, T. L. 1985. Arborescent lycopod reproduction and paleoecology in a coal-swamp environment of late middle Pennsylvanian age (Herrin Coal, Illinois, U.S.A.). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 44:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, D. K. 1985. The origin of leaf-assemblages—new light on an old problem. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 46:117–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastaldo, R. A. 1983. Upper Carboniferous paleoecological reconstructions: observations and reconsiderations. Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère 10:281–296.Google Scholar
Gastaldo, R. A. 1986. An explanation for lycopod configuration, ‘Fossil Grove’ Victoria Park, Glasgow. Scottish Journal of Geology 22(1):77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastaldo, R. A. 1987. Confirmation of Carboniferous clastic swamp communities. Nature (London) 326:869–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastaldo, R. A. 1989. Preliminary observations on phytotaphonomic assemblages in a subtropical/temperate Holocene bayhead delta: Mobile Delta, Gulf Coastal Plain, Alabama. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 58:61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastaldo, R. A., Bearce, S. C., Degges, C. W., Hunt, R. J., Peebles, M. W., and Violette, D. L. 1989. Biostratinomy of a Holocene oxbow lake: a backswamp to mid-channel transect. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 58:47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulter, P.F.E., and Allaway, W. G. 1979. Litter fall and decomposition in a mangrove stand, Avicennia marine (Forsk.) Vierh., in Middle Harbour, Sydney. Australian Journal of Freshwater Research 30:541–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, L. J. 1980. Paleocene stratigraphy and flora of the Clark's Fork Basin. Pp. 33–51In Gingerich, P. D., ed. Early Cenozoic paleontology and stratigraphy of the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology no. 24.Google Scholar
Klinge, H., and Rodrigues, W. A. 1968. Litter production in an area of Amazonian terra firme forest. Part I. Litter-fall, organic carbon and total nitrogen contents of litter. Amazoniana 1(4):287–302.Google Scholar
Kunkel-Westphal, I., and Kunkel, P. 1979. Litter fall in a Guatemalan primary forest, with details of leaf-shedding by some common tree species. Journal of Ecology 67:665–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidgard, S., and Crane, P. R. 1990. Angiosperm diversification and Cretaceous florisitic trends: a comparison of palynofloras and leaf macrofloras. Paleobiology 16(1):79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayack, D. T., Thorp, J. H., and Cothran, M. 1989. Effects of burial and floodplain retention on stream processing of allochthonous litter. Oikos 54:378–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. G., O'Neill, J. P., and Higman, D. 1989. Vertical profile and canopy organization in a mixed deciduous forest. Vegetatio 85:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putz, F. E. 1983. Liana biomass and leaf area of a “Tierra Firme” forest in the Rio Negro Basin, Venezuela. Biotropica 15(3):185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putz, F. E. 1990. Liana stem diameter growth and mortality rates on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 22(1):103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawat, Y. S., and Singh, J. S. 1989. Forest floor biomass, litterfall and nutrient return in Central Himalayan oak forests. Vegetatio 82:113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheihing, M. H. 1980. Reduction of wind velocity by the forest canopy and the rarity of non-arborescent plants in the Upper Carboniferous fossil record. Argumenta Palaeobotanica 6:133–138.Google Scholar
Scheihing, M. H., and Pfefferkorn, H. W. 1984. The taphonomy of land plants in the Orinoco delta: a model for the incorporation of plant parts in clastic sediments of late Carboniferous age of Euramerica. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 41:205–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A. C. 1977. A review of the ecology of Upper Carboniferous plant assemblages with new data from Strathclyde. Palaeontology 20(2):447–473.Google Scholar
Spicer, R. A. 1980. The importance of depositional sorting to biostratigraphy of plant megafossils. Pp. 171–184In Dilcher, D. L. and Taylor, T. N., eds. Biostratigraphy of fossil plants. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa.Google Scholar
Spicer, R. A. 1981. The sorting and deposition of allochthonous plant material in a modern environment at Silwood Lake, Silwood Park, Berkshire, England. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, R. A. 1989. The formation and interpretation of plant fossil assemblages. Advances in Botanical Research 16:95–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, R. A., and Greer, A. 1986. Plant taphonomy in fluvial and lacustrine systems. Pp. 10–26In Broadhead, T. W., ed. Land plants: notes for a short course, vol. 15. University of Tennessee Department of Geological Sciences Studies in Geology.Google Scholar
Spicer, R. A., and Hill, C. R. 1979. Principal components and correspondence analyses of quantitative data from a Jurassic plant bed. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 28:273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, R. A., and Wolfe, J. A. 1987. Plant taphonomy of late Holocene deposits in Trinity (Clair Engle) Lake, northern California. Paleobiology 13(2):227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggert, R. E. 1988. The effect of vegetation heterogeneity on short stratigraphic sequences. In Methods and applications of plant paleoecology. Paleontological Society Special Publication 3:147–171.Google Scholar
Turnbull, C.R.A., and Madden, J. L. 1983. Relationship of litterfall to basal area and climatic variables in cool temperate forests of southern Tasmania. Australian Journal of Ecology 8:425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Schaik, C. P., and Mirmanto, E. 1985. Spatial variation in the structure and litterfall of a Sumatran rain forest. Biotropica 17(3):196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, S. L. 1984. Relation of paleovegetation to geometry and cyclicity of some fluvial carbonaceous deposits. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 54(1):52–66.Google Scholar
Wnuk, C., and Pfefferkorn, H. W. 1984. The life habits and paleoecology of Middle Pennsylvania medullosan pterido-sperms based on an in situ assemblage from the Bernice Basin (Sullivan County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.). Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 41:329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wnuk, C., and Pfefferkorn, H. W. 1987. A Pennsylvanian-age terrestrial storm deposit: using plant fossils to characterize the history and process of sediment accumulation. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 57(2):212–221.Google Scholar
Woods, F. W., and Gallegos, C. M. 1970. Litter accumulation in selected forests of the Republic of Panama. Biotropica 2(1):46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar