Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:23:45.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rancho La Brea: status and future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

William A. Akersten ,
Christopher A. Shaw ,
George T. Jefferson  and
George C. Page
William A. Akersten
Affiliation:
Museum, 5801 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90036
Christopher A. Shaw
Affiliation:
Museum, 5801 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90036
George T. Jefferson
Affiliation:
Museum, 5801 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90036
George C. Page
Affiliation:
Museum, 5801 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90036
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rancho La Brea is unquestionably the most famous fossil deposit in North America, and its fauna occupies a key position in vertebrate paleontology as the basis for the Rancholabrean Land Mammal Age. The 23 acres now known as Hancock Park yielded the bulk of fossil specimens from this locality. A minimum of 518 taxa have been identified to date including 79 algae (all but one of which are diatoms), 72 vascular plants, 9 nonmarine mollusks (13 taxa of marine mollusks were carried to the site by early Indians), 135 arthropods, 27 lower vertebrates, 138 birds, and 58 mammals. A detailed list of the biota, too lengthy for inclusion here, is available from the authors on request.

Type
Current Happenings
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , Summer 1983 , pp. 211 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1982. Time resolution in fluvial vertebrate assemblages. Paleobiology. 8:211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bischoff, J. L. and Rosenbauer, R. J. 1981. Uranium series dating of human skeletal remains from the Del Mar and Sunnyvale Sites, California. Science. 213:1003–1005.Google Scholar
Bromage, T. G. and Shermis, S. 1981. The La Brea Woman (HC 1323): descriptive analysis. Occ. Pap. Soc. California Archeol. 3:59–75.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. E. Jr. and Tonni, E. P. 1981. Preliminary observations on the paleobiology and evolution of teratorns (Aves: Teratornithidae). J. Vert. Paleo. 1:265–272.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. E. Jr. and Tonni, E. P. 1983. Size and locomotion in teratorns. Auk. 100:390–403.Google Scholar
Denton, W. 1877. On the asphalt bed near Los Angeles, California. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 18:185–186.Google Scholar
Doberenz, A. R. and Wyckoff, R. W. G. 1967. Fine structure in fossil collagen. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 57:539–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagne, R. J., and Miller, S. E. 1982. Protochrysomyia howardae from Rancho La Brea, California, Pleistocene, new junior synonym of Cochliomyia macellaria (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Bull. Southern California Acad. Sci. 50:95–96.Google Scholar
Ho, T. Y. 1965. The amino acid composition of bone and tooth proteins in late Pleistocene mammals. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 54:26–31.Google Scholar
Ho, T. Y. 1967. Relationship between amino acid contents of mammalian bone collagen and body temperature as a basis for estimation of body temperature of prehistoric mammals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 22:113–119.Google Scholar
Ho, T. Y., Marcus, L. F., and Berger, R. 1969. Radiocarbon dating of petroleum-impregnated bone from tar pits at Rancho La Brea, California. Science. 164:1051–1052.Google Scholar
Howard, H. 1932. Eagles and eagle-like vultures of the Pleistocene of Rancho La Brea. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 429:1–111.Google Scholar
Howard, H. 1962. A comparison of prehistoric avian assemblages from individual pits at Rancho La Brea, California. Los Angeles Co. Mus. Contrib. Sci. 58:1–24.Google Scholar
Marcus, L. F. 1960. A census of the abundant large Pleistocene mammals from Rancho La Brea. Los Angeles Co. Mus. Contrib. Sci. 38:1–11.Google Scholar
Marcus, L. F. and Berger, R.In press. The significance of radiocarbon dates for Rancho La Brea. In: Martin, P. and Klein, R., eds. Quaternary Extinctions. Univ. Arizona Press; Tucson.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S., Blunt, D. J., Kvenvolden, K. A., Miller, S. E., Marcus, L. F., and Pardi, R. 1982. Amino acid geochemistry of fossil bones from the Rancho La Brea asphalt deposit, California. Quat. Res. 18:174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. J. 1983. Sabertooths: some new evidence in support of the stabbing hypothesis for Smilodon californicus Bovard. Carnivore. 3(2):8–26 (dated 1980).Google Scholar
Miller, S. E. 1983. Late Quaternary insects of Rancho La Brea and McKittrick, California. Quat. Res. 20:90–104.Google Scholar
Miller, W. E. and Brotherson, J. D. 1979. Size variation in foot elements of Bison from Rancho La Brea. Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co. 323:1–19.Google Scholar
Nigra, J. O. and Lance, J. F. 1947. A statistical study of the metapodials of the dire wolf group from the Pleistocene of Rancho La Brea. Bull. So. Cal. Acad. Sci. 46:26–34.Google Scholar
Salls, R. 1980. The La Brea cogged stone. Masterkey. 54:53–59.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. A. 1982. Techniques used in excavation, preparation and curation of fossils from Rancho La Brea. Curator 25:63–77.Google Scholar
Stock, C. 1956. Rancho La Brea, a record of Pleistocene life in California. Los Angeles Co. Mus. Nat. Hist., Sci. Ser. 20:1–81.Google Scholar
Warter, J. K. 1976. Late Pleistocene plant communities—evidence from the Rancho La Brea tar pits. Pp. 32–39. In: Letting, J., ed. Plant Communities of Southern California. Spec. Publ. No. 2. Calif. Native Plant Soc., Berkeley.Google Scholar
Woodard, G. D. and Marcus, L. F. 1973. Rancho La Brea fossil deposits: a re-evaluation from stratigraphic and geological evidence. J. Paleontol. 47:54–69.Google Scholar