Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:26:57.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant taphonomy of late Holocene deposits in Trinity (Clair Engle) Lake, northern California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Robert A. Spicer  and
Jack A. Wolfe
Robert A. Spicer
Affiliation:
Life Sciences Department, Goldsmiths' College, Creek Road, London SE8 3BU, England
Jack A. Wolfe
Affiliation:
Paleontology and Stratigraphy Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Six drainage basins at the margins of Trinity Lake were analyzed to determine the relations of source vegetation (largely coniferous forest) to plant debris in deltaic deposits that represent high-energy depositional environments. Thirty-one samples containing an estimated 1,043,000 identifiable plant fragments were subjected to a multivariate statistical (correspondence) analysis; in the resulting ordination, samples from the more mesic side of the lake clustered separately from samples from the drier side of the lake. The distribution of a species in the source vegetation is generally paralleled by the distribution of the same species in the samples, and all major forest trees are present in the samples. However, relative abundances in the source vegetation have no direct relation to relative abundances in the samples. Plants growing far away from depositional sites are poorly represented, even if these plants produce organs suited to long-distance transport; this occurs by dilution by material derived from plants in proximity to depositional sites and suggests that megafossil assemblages that contain putative mixtures of high-altitude “temperate” and low-altitude “thermophilic” taxa represent true biotic associations. The information gained from the Trinity analysis is compared to information gained from analysis of plant debris in low-energy depositional environments; each environment contains different kinds of information that is significant in paleoecological reconstructions of regional vegetation. Whereas high-energy environments contain the best taxonomic representation of source vegetation, low-energy environments retain information on spatial distributions of taxa within source vegetation. High-energy environments typically also contain the best representation of different organs of a given taxon.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Spring 1987 , pp. 227 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Benzecri, J. P. 1973. L'Analyse des Données. 2, L'Analyse des Correspondences. Dunod; Paris. 619 pp.Google Scholar
Birks, H. H. 1973. Modern macrofossil assemblages in lake sediments in Minnesota. Pp. 173–189. In: Birks, M. J. B. and West, R. G., eds., Quaternary Plant Ecology: British Ecological Society Symposium, 14th.Blackwell Scientific Publications; London.Google Scholar
Chaney, R. W. 1924. Quantitative studies of the Bridge Creek flora. Amer. J. Sci. 8:127–144.Google Scholar
Crane, P. R. 1981. Betulaceous leaves and fruits from the British Upper Palaeocene. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 83:103–136.Google Scholar
Crane, P. R. and Stockey, R. A. 1985. Growth and reproductive biology of Joffrea speirsii gen. et sp. nov., a Cercidiphyllum-like plant from the Late Paleocene of Alberta, Canada. Can. J. Bot. 63:340–364.Google Scholar
David, M., Dagbert, M., and Beauchemin, Y. 1977. Statistical analysis in geology: correspondence analysis method. Colo. School Mines Quart. 72:1–60.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D. K. 1985. The origin of leaf assemblages—new light on an old problem. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 46:117–188.Google Scholar
Ferlatte, W. J. 1974. Flora of the Trinity Alps of Northern California. Univ. California Press; Berkeley. 206 pp.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1940. The precision of discriminant functions. Ann. Engineer. London. 10:422–429.Google Scholar
Hill, M. O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61:237–249.Google Scholar
Hill, M. O. 1979. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. Applied Statistics. 23:340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. O. and Gauch, H. D. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio. 42:47–58.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1963. Hydraulic studies on the origin of bedding. Sedimentol. 2:115–121.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1965a. Hydraulic factors controlling the shape of laminae in laboratory deltas. J. Sediment. Petrol. 33:777–791.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1965b. Laboratory studies of the distribution of grain sizes in crossbedded deposits in primary sedimentary structures and their hydrodynamic interpretation: Soc. Econ. Paleontolog. Mineralog. Spec. Pub. 12:53–65.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., Klovan, J. E., and Reyment, R. A. 1976. Geological Factor Analysis. Elsevier Publ. Co.; Amsterdam. 178 pp.Google Scholar
McKee, E. D. 1957. Flume experiments on the production of stratification and cross-stratification. J. Sediment. Petrol. 27:129–134.Google Scholar
McQueen, D. R. 1969. Macroscopic plant remains in Recent lake sediments. Tuatara. 17:13–19.Google Scholar
Munz, P. A. and Keck, D. D. 1968. A California Flora and Supplement. Univ. California Press; Berkeley. 1905 pp.Google Scholar
Nevin, C. M. and Trainer, D. W. Jr. 1927. Laboratory study in delta-building. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 38:451–458.Google Scholar
Otto, G. H. 1938. The sedimentation unit and its use in field sampling. J. Geol. 46:569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheihing, M. H. and Pfefferkorn, H. W. 1984. The taphonomy of land plants in the Orinoco Delta: a model for the incorporation of plant parts in clastic sediments of Late Carboniferous age of Eurameria. Rev. Palaeobot. Palyn. 41:205–240.Google Scholar
Spicer, R. A. 1981. The sorting and deposition of allochthonous plant material in a modern environment at Silwood Lake, Silwood Park, Berkshire, England. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1143. 69 pp.Google Scholar
Spicer, R. A. and Hill, C. R. 1979. Principal components and correspondence analyses of quantitative data from a Jurassic plant bed. Rev. Palaeobot. Palyn. 28:273–299.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1960. Paleoecologic dissonance; Astrate and Nipa in the early Eocene London Clay. Amer. J. Sci. 258-A:418–419.Google Scholar