Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T17:13:40.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paleozoic dipnoan phylogeny: functional complexes and evolution without parsimony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

K. S. W. Campbell  and
R. E. Barwick
K. S. W. Campbell
Affiliation:
Geology Department, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia, 2601
R. E. Barwick
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia, 2601
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Attempts at understanding evolutionary relationships among Paleozoic Dipnoi (lungfish) using cladistic methodology have proved totally unsatisfactory (Miles 1977; Marshall 1987). We attempt to reconstruct the relationships between the better known genera using a method that involves the recognition of lineages based on evolving functional complexes, particularly those involved with food reduction and respiration. Within these broadly defined lineages, we have defined sub-lineages based on evolutionary patterns shown by structures that have been stratigraphically dated; such patterns are found inter alia in the roofing bones and the external dermal bones of the mandible. A number of new suborders and families are recognised; genera for which further morphological data are required before they can be assigned to a higher taxon are indicated; two generic synonyms are recognised.

In appendices, short descriptions are given of two new genera—Pillararhynchus from the Gogo Formation (Upper Devonian) of Western Australia, and Sorbitorhynchus from the Emsian of Guangxi, China.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , Spring 1990 , pp. 143 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Berman, D. S. 1976. Cranial morphology of the Lower Permian lungfish Gnathorhiza (Osteichthyes: Dipnoi). Journal of Paleontology 50:1020–1033.Google Scholar
Bernacsek, G. M. 1977. A lungfish cranium from the Middle Devonian of the Yukon Territory, Canada. Palaeontographica B 157:175–200.Google Scholar
Bertmar, G. 1968a. Phylogeny and evolution in lungfishes. Acta Zoologica 49:189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertmar, G. 1968b. Lungfish phylogeny. Pp. 259–283. In Ørvig, T. (ed.), Current Problems of Lower Vertebrate Phylogeny. Almqvist and Wiskell; Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1981. Lungfishes—alive and extinct. Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin 52(8):3–5.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W., and Barwick, R. E. 1983. Early evolution of dipnoan dentitions and a new genus Speonesydrion. Memoir of the Association of Australasian Paleontologists 1:17–49.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W., and Barwick, R. E. 1984a. The choana, maxillae, premaxillae and anterior bones of early dipnoans. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 107:147–170.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W., and Barwick, R. E. 1984b. Speonesydrion, an Early Devonian dipnoan with primitive toothplates. PaleoIchthyologica 2:1–48.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W., and Barwick, R. E. 1987. Paleozoic lungfishes—a review. Journal of Morphology. Supplement 1:93–131.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W., and Barwick, R. E. 1988a. Geological and palaeontological information and phylogenetic hypotheses. Geological Magazine 125:207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W., and Barwick, R. E. 1988b. Uranolophus: reappraisal of a primitive dipnoan. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Paleontologists 7:87–144.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W., and Barwick, R. E. 1990 (in press). Teeth and toothplates in primitive lungfish and a new species of Holodipterus.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W., and Bell, M. W. 1982. Soederberghia (Dipnoi) from the Late Devonian of New South Wales. Alcheringa 6:143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W., and Smith, M. M. 1987. The Devonian dipnoan Holodipterus: dental form, variation and remodelling growth mechanisms. Records of the Australian Museum 39(3):131–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorn, J., & Conley, C. D. 1978. A late Pennsylvanian vertebrate assemblage from stromatolites in the Bern Limestone, northeastern Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 81:139Google Scholar
Coombs, S., Janssen, J., and Webb, J. F. 1987. Diversity of lateral line systems: evolutionary and functional considerations. Pp. 553–593. In Atema, J., Fay, R. R., Popper, A. N., and Tavolga, W. N. (eds.), Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals. Springer-Verlag; New York.Google Scholar
Denison, R. H. 1974. The structure and evolution of teeth in lung-fishes. Fieldiana Geology 33:31–58.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. C. 1981. The role of functional analysis in phylogenetic inference: examples from the history of the Xiphosura. American Zoologist 21:47–62.Google Scholar
Gorizdro-Kulczycka, Z. 1950. Les dipneustes Devoniens du Massif de Ste Croix. Acta Geologica Polonica 1:53–105.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, W., & Westoll, T. S. 1937. On a new long-headed dipnoan fish from the Upper Devonian of Scaumenac Bay, P.Q., Canada. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 59:241–266.Google Scholar
Gross, W. 1956. Über Crossopterygier und Dipnoer aus dem baltischen Oberdevon im Zusammenhang einer vergleichenden Untersuchung des Porenkanalsystems paläozoischer Agnathen und Fische. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar Ser. 4. 5(6):1–140.Google Scholar
Jacob, F. 1983. Molecular tinkering in evolution. Pp. 131–144. In Bendall, D. S. (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1927. Der Kopf der Wirbeltiere. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Anatomie 27:815–934.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E. 1967. On the structure of the lower jaw in dipnoans: with a description of an early Devonian dipnoan from Canada, Melanognathus canadensis gen. et sp. nov. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 47:155–183.Google Scholar
Krupina, N. I. 1980. A new dipnoan genus from the Famennian deposits of the Central Devonian field, Orel Oblast, U.S.S.R. Paleontologicheskiye Zhurnal 1980(3):140–143. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Krupina, N. I. 1986. On the skull roof of Orlovichthys limnatis (Dipnoi). Paleontologicheskiye Zhurnal 1986(4):113–116.Google Scholar
Lehman, J-P. 1959. Les Dipneustes du Dévonien Supérieur du Groenland. Meddelelser om Gr⊘nland 160(4):1–58.Google Scholar
Lehman, J-P. 1966. Dipnoi et Crossopterygii. Pp. 243–412. In Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie. Volume 4. Masson et Cie; Paris.Google Scholar
Liem, K. F., and Greenwood, P. H. 1981. A functional approach to the phylogeny of the pharyngognath teleosts. American Zoologist 21:83–101.Google Scholar
Long, J. A. 1987. A redescription of the lungfish Eoctenodus Hills 1929, with reassessment of other Australian records of the genus Dipterus Sedgwick & Murchison 1828. Records of the Western Australian Museum 13:297–314.Google Scholar
Long, J. A., and Campbell, K. S. W. 1985. A new lungfish from the Lower Carboniferous of Victoria, Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 97:87–93.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. R. 1987. Lungfish: phylogeny and parsimony. Journal of Morphology, Supplement 1:151–162.Google Scholar
Miles, R. S. 1977. Dipnoan (lungfish) skulls and the relationships of the group: a study based on new species from the Devonian of Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 61:1–328.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., and Miles, R. S. 1971. Paleozoic Fishes. Second Edition. W. B. Saunders Co.; Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Ørvig, T. 1961. New finds of acanthodians, arthrodires, crossopterygians, ganoids and dipnoans in the Upper Middle Devonian Calcareous Flags (Oberer Plattenkalk) of the Bergisch Gladbach—Paffrath Trough. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 35:10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1982. The use of parsimony in testing phylogenetic hypotheses. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 74:305–328.Google Scholar
Pearson, D. M., and Westoll, T. S. 1979. The Devonian actinopterygian Cheirolepis Agassiz. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 70:337–399.Google Scholar
Schultze, H-P. 1977. Megapleuron zangerli. A new dipnoan from the Pennsylvanian, Illinois. Fieldiana Geology 33:375–396.Google Scholar
Schultze, H-P. 1990 (in press). A long-headed lungfish from the Late Devonian of Iowa, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Schultze, H-P., and Campbell, K. S. W. 1987. Characterisation of the Dipnoi, a monophyletic group. Journal of Morphology, Supplement 1:25–37.Google Scholar
Smith, M. M. 1984. Petrodentine in extant and fossil dipnoan dentitions: micro-structure, histogenesis and growth. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 107:367–407.Google Scholar
Smith, M. M. 1988. The dentition of Palaeozoic lungfishes: a consideration of the significance of teeth, denticles and toothplates for dipnoan phylogeny. Memoires du Muséum Nationale d'Histoire Naturelle Serie C 53:179–194.Google Scholar
Smith, M. M., and Campbell, K. S. W. 1987. Comparative morphology, histology and growth of the dental plates of the Devonian Dipnoan Chirodipterus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 317:329–363.Google Scholar
Smith, M. M., Smithson, T. R., and Campbell, K. S. W. 1987. The relationships of Uronemus: a Carboniferous dipnoan with highly modified toothplates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 317:299–327.Google Scholar
Szalay, F. S. 1981. Functional analysis and the practice of the phylogenetic method as reflected by some mammalian studies. American Zoologist 21:37–45.Google Scholar
Thomson, K. S. 1965. On the relationships of certain Carboniferous Dipnoi, with descriptions of four new forms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh B 69:221–245.Google Scholar
Thomson, K. S., and Campbell, K. S. W. 1971. The structure and relationships of the primitive Devonian lungfish Dipnorhynchus sussmilchi. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 38.Google Scholar
Vorob'yeva, E. I. 1972. A new dipnoan genus from the Paleozoic Emyaksin suite of Yakutia. Paleontologicheskiye Zhurnal 6(2):229–234. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S., and Day, H. 1916. Notes on some Palaeozoic fishes. Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society 60:1–48.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S., and Gill, E. L. 1923. The structure of certain Palaeozoic Dipnoi. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 35:165–216.Google Scholar
Wells, R. T., Horton, D. R., and Rogers, P. 1982. Thylacoleo carnifex Owen (Thylacoleonidae): marsupial carnivore? Pp. 573–586. In Archer, M. (ed.), Carnivorous Marsupials. Vol. 2. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales; Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Westoll, T. S. 1949. On the evolution of the Dipnoi. Pp. 121–184. In Jepson, G. L., Simpson, G. G., and Mayr, E. (eds.), Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution. Princeton University Press; Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
White, E. I. 1965. The head of Dipterus valenciennesi Sedgwick and Murchison. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Geology) 11:1–45.Google Scholar