Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:37:55.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the declining extinction and origination rates of fossil taxa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Craig M. Pease*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin Texas 78712

Abstract

The per-stage extinction rate is the product of the per-taxon extinction rate and stage length, and the per-stage origination rate is defined similarly. These rates decline from ancient to recent times because of the pull of the Recent, because there is more young than old fossiliferous rock, and because average stage length increases from the recent to the past. More specifically, the present model assumes that the graphs of ln(per-stage extinction rate) and ln(per-stage origination rate) versus geologic time have slope zero in the absence of sampling biases, and shows how sampling biases cause both these graphs to appear to have slope min(h,q) + s in the distant past, where h and q are the fossil loss and actual per-taxon extinction rates, and the stratigraphic constant, s, quantifies how stage length changes through time.

Although the per-stage rates of bivalve families and marine invertebrate genera decline toward the recent, the magnitudes of these declines are entirely consistent with what the present model predicts sampling biases will produce. Hence there is no need to postulate a biological explanation for these patterns.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blatt, H., and Jones, R. L. 1975. Proportions of exposed igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks. Geological Society of America Bulletin 86:10851088.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B., Cox, A. V., Llewellyn, P. G., Pickton, C.A.G., Smith, A. G., and Walters, R. 1982. A geologic time scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. D., and Pollock, K. H. 1983. Estimating taxonomic diversity, extinction rates, and speciation rates from fossil data using capture-recapture models. Paleobiology 9:150163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, C. M. 1985. Biases in the durations and diversities of fossil taxa. Paleobiology 11:272292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, C. M. 1988a. Biases in the total extinction rates of fossil taxa. Journal of Theoretical Biology 130:17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, C. M. 1988b. Biases in the per-taxon origination and extinction rates of fossil taxa. Journal of Theoretical Biology 130:930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, C. M. 1988c. Biases in the survivorship curves of fossil taxa. Journal of Theoretical Biology 130:3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, C. M. 1988d. On comparing the geologic durations of easily versus poorly fossilized taxa. Journal of Theoretical Biology 133:255257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. A compendium of fossil marine families. Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology no. 51.Google Scholar
Thackeray, J. F. 1990. Rates of extinction in marine invertebrates: further comparison between background and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 16:2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar