Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:01:18.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphogenetic gradients in Paleozoic bryozoan colonies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Robert L. Anstey
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Michigan State University; East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Joseph F. Pachut
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Michigan State University; East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Dennis R. Prezbindowski
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin; Austin; Texas 78712

Abstract

Subcolony boundaries within Paleozoic bryozoan colonies, not otherwise easily observable, can be located precisely by computer mapping of variables derived from Fourier series. The monticule-centered subcolonies were maintained by morphogenetic gradients that controlled zooecial size and form, zooidal degeneration (producing brown bodies), and the spacing of monticules with respect to each other. These gradients were probably determined by the release of a budding inhibitor from polymorphic zooids within the monticule. In colonies with active monticular budding the morphogenetic gradients represent ontogenetic series, as the zooids that arose in the monticule gradually migrated outward along modified spiral pathways. Polymorphism, including reproductive functions, is probably reflected in the spatial order of zooids away from a monticule. In subcolonies with monticular budding, polymorphs represent different stages in the life history of a single zooid, with gradual transitions in zooecial form between castes.

The structural similarity between monticules and oghurd dunes supports the idea that they also functioned as excurrent water outlets, possibly with reproductive polymorphs clustered near the outflow. The variability of monticular size and spacing in some colonies indicates that hydrodynamic efficiency was compromised by the need for developmental plasticity. The development of active budding within monticules is considered an ecophenotypic response to the external environment, suggesting that all monticules within the Stenolaemata were potential budding sites. Monticules were successful adaptations in bryozoans because they performed a multiplicity of functions. While regulating the morphogenesis of the colony, they simultaneously served the metabolic functions of waste removal, feeding and reproduction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anstey, R. L. and Delmet, D. A. 1972. Genetic meaning of zooecial chamber shapes in fossil bryozoans. Science. 177:10001002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anstey, R. L. and Delmet, D. A. 1973. Fourier analysis of zooecial shapes in fossil tubular bryozoans. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 84:17531764.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, R. L. and Pachut, J. F. 1974. Size, shape and surface area variations of zooecia and monticular mosaics within zoaria of Paleozoic tubular bryozoans. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Annu. Meet. Abstr. 1:2.Google Scholar
Anstey, R. L. and Perry, T. G. 1973. Eden Shale bryozoans: a numerical study (Ordovician, Ohio Valley). Mich. State Univ., Pub. Mus., Paleontol. Ser. 1:180.Google Scholar
Astrova, G. G. 1973. Polymorphism and its development in the trepostomatous Bryozoa. pp. 110. In: Larwood, G. P., ed. Living and Fossil Bryozoa. 634 pp. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar
Banta, W. C., McKinney, F. K., and Zimmer, R. L. 1974. Bryozoan monticules: excurrent water outlets? Science. 185:783784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boardman, R. S. and Cheetham, A. H. 1973. Degrees of colony dominance in stenolaemate and gymnolaemate Bryozoa. pp. 121220. In: Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A., eds. Animal Colonies. 603 pp. Dowden, Hutchison, and Ross; Stroudsburg, Pa.Google Scholar
Bonner, J. T. 1974. On development. 282 pp. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bronstein, G. 1939. Sur les gradients physiologiques dans une colonie de Bryozoaires. C. R. hebd. Séance Acad. Sci., Paris. 209:602603.Google Scholar
Coates, A. G. and Oliver, W. A. 1973. Coloniality in zoantharian corals. pp. 328. In: Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A., eds. Animal Colonies. 603 pp. Dowden, Hutchison and Ross; Stroudsburg, Pa.Google Scholar
Cowen, R. 1966. The distribution of punctae on the brachiopod shell. Geol. Mag. 103:269275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmet, D. A. and Anstey, R. L. 1974. Fourier analysis of morphological plasticity within an Ordovician bryozoan colony. J. Paleontol. 48:217226.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, R. and Weinberg, B. 1970. An exact method for characterization of grain shape. J. Sediment. Petrol. 40:205212.Google Scholar
Folk, R. L. 1971. Genesis of longitudinal and oghurd dunes elucidated by rolling upon grease. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 82:34613468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Katz, M. 1975. Disruption of ideal geometry in the growth of receptaculitids: a natural experiment in theoretical morphology. Paleobiology 1:120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1974. Autozooecial budding patterns and their evolutionary significance in ramose Paleozoic bryozoans. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Annu. Meet. Abstr. 1:61.Google Scholar
Rice, E. L. 1974. Allelopathy. 353 pp. Academic Press; New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
Ryland, J. S. 1970. Bryozoans. 175 pp. Hutchinson Univ. Library; London.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1973. Organization and evolution of graptolite colonies. pp. 441514. In: Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A., eds. Animal Colonies. 603 pp. Dowden, Hutchison and Ross; Stroudsburg, Pa.Google Scholar
Utgaard, J. 1973. Mode of colony growth, autozooids, and polymorphism in the bryozoan order Cystoporata. pp. 317360. In: Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A., eds. Animal Colonies. 603 pp. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross; Stroudsburg, Pa.Google Scholar
Wittick, R. I. 1973. GEOSYS, an information system for the description and analysis of spatial data (version 4). Mich. State Univ. Comput. Inst. Soc. Sci. Res. Tech. Rep. 74–53:139.Google Scholar