Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:21:09.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphogenesis of uniaxiate graptoloid colonies—a mathematical model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Adam Urbanek  and
Janusz Uchmański
Adam Urbanek
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Unit for Graptolite Research, ul. Newelska 6, Pl-01-447 Warszawa, Poland
Janusz Uchmański
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Unit for Graptolite Research, ul. Newelska 6, Pl-01-447 Warszawa, Poland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morphological gradients in graptoloid colonies are explained by the production and diffusion of a morphogen from the sicula distalwards. Size of the thecae is inversely related to the amount of morphogen present. The graduate decrease of morphogen is given by a set of algebraic equations, and its effect on zooid growth is described by a modified Michaelis-Menten relationship. Changes in size of thecae computed on the basis of these equations fit the changes observed in graptolite colonies. Sets of differential equations are also given to describe the rate of morphogen diffusion and some other processes possibly involved in the development of uniaxiate graptoloid colonies. The suggested basic model of these colonies can be completed by a number of additional assumptions; however, computer experiments reveal that such assumptions do not affect the main properties of the model, namely the appearance of graded series of thecae. New evidence for regeneration of the sicular portion of the broken rhabdosome is presented, providing arguments that morphogen was produced by the siculozooid as a single bolus of secretion. Some local exclusions from the regular size gradient are discussed, and tentative explanations are suggested.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , Winter 1990 , pp. 49 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bard, J. B. L. 1982. A membrane-carrier mechanism for generating new sources and sinks within gradient-controlled tissues—its application to regeneration in Oncopeltus. Journal of Theoretical Biology 9:689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, M. N., and Schrandt, A. R. 1966. Colony development of polymorphic hydroids as a problem in pattern formation. Pp. 169–198. In Rees, W. T. (ed.), The Cnidaria and Their Evolution. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. J., Bryant, S. V., and French, V. 1977. Biological regeneration and pattern formation. Scientific American 237:67–81.Google Scholar
Child, C. M. 1915. Individuality in Organisms. University of Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Child, C. M. 1941. Patterns and Problems of Development. University of Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1975. The origin and early phylogeny of the cheilostomatous Bryozoa. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 20:395–423.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1981. Evolutionary relationships of the early Palaeozoic “cyclostomatous” Bryozoa. Palaeontology 20:827–861.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1983. Geometrical constraints in the construction of graptolite stipes. Paleobiology 9:116–125.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Bell, A. 1987. Branching geometry and function of multiramous graptoloids. Paleobiology 13:1–19.Google Scholar
French, V., Bryant, P. J., and Bryant, S. V. 1976. Pattern regulation in epimorphic fields. Science 193:969–981.Google Scholar
Gierer, A. 1974. Hydra as a model for the development of biological form. Scientific American 231:44–54.Google Scholar
Hejnowicz, Z. 1975. A model for a morphogenetic map and clock. Journal of Theoretical Biology 54:345–362.Google Scholar
Holder, N. 1979. Positional information and pattern formation in plant morphogenesis and a mechanism for the involvement of plant hormones. Journal of Theoretical Biology 77:195–212.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. 1981. Simpler rules for epimorphic regeneration: the polar-coordinate model without polar coordinates. Journal of Theoretical Biology 88:371–392.Google Scholar
Lewis, J., Slack, J. M. W., and Wolpert, L. 1977. Thresholds in development. Journal of Theoretical Biology 65:579–590.Google Scholar
MacWilliams, H. K., and Papageorgiou, S. 1978. A model of gradient interpretation based on morphogen binding. Journal of Theoretical Biology 72:385–411.Google Scholar
Meinhardt, H., and Gierer, A. 1980. Generation and regeneration of sequence of structures during morphogenesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 85:429–450.Google Scholar
Murray, J. D. 1977. Lectures on nonlinear differential equation models in biology. Clarendon Press; Oxford.Google Scholar
Plickert, G. 1987. Low-molecular-weight factor from colonial hydroids affects pattern formation. Roux's Archive of Developmental Biology 196:248–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rickards, R. B. 1978. Major aspects of evolution of the graptolites. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 23:585–594.Google Scholar
Schaller, H. C. 1973. Isolation and characterization of a low-molecular-weight substance activating head and bud formation in Hydra. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 29:27–38.Google Scholar
Schenck, D. A. 1965. Die Kormentektonik der Plumulariiden (Coelenterata, Hydrozoa). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 72:885–1021.Google Scholar
Slack, J. M. W. 1980. A serial threshold theory of regeneration. Journal of Theoretical Biology 82:105–140.Google Scholar
Stebbing, R. D. 1979. The self-control of growth. Spectrum 165:2–4.Google Scholar
Sudbury, M. 1958. Triangulate monograptids from the Monograptus gregarius Zone of the Rheidol Gorge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 241:485–555.Google Scholar
Thaler, C., and Eichele, G. 1987. Identification and spatial distribution of retinoids in the developing chick limb bud. Nature 327:625–628.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1960. An attempt at biological interpretation of evolutionary changes in graptolite colonies. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 5:127–336.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1963. Organization and regeneration of cladia in some Upper Silurian monograptids. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 8:135–254.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1973. Organization and evolution of graptolite colonies. Pp. 441–514. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A. Jr. (eds.), Animal Colonies: Development and Function Through Time. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross; Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Webster, G. 1971. Morphogenesis and pattern formation in hydroids. Biological Review 46:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, J. E. 1976. Experimental culture of the estuarine ectoproct Conopeum tenuissimum from Chesapeake Bay. Biological Bulletin 150:318–335.Google Scholar
Wolpert, L. 1969. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 25:1–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpert, L. 1971. Positional information and pattern formation. Pp. 183–224. In Moscona, A. A., and Monroy, A. (eds.), Current Topics in Developmental Biology. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar
Wolpert, L. 1978. Pattern formation in biological development. Scientific American 239:124–137.Google Scholar
Zajaczkowski, S., Wodzicki, T. J., and Romberg, J. A. 1984. Auxin waves and plant morphogenesis. Pp. 244–262. In Scott, T. K. (ed.), Hormonal Regulation of Development II. Springer; Berlin.Google Scholar