Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:04:46.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mid-Paleozoic precursor to the Mesozoic marine revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Philip W. Signor III  and
Carlton E. Brett
Philip W. Signor III
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
Carlton E. Brett
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mid-Paleozoic was punctuated by a rapid radiation of durophagous (shell-crushing) predators. These new predators were primarily placoderm and chondrichthyan fishes but probably also included phyllocarid and eumalacostracan arthropods. Coincident with the radiation of these durophages, beginning in the mid-Devonian, there was an increase in the frequency of predation-resistant morphologies in a variety of marine invertebrate taxa. Among bellerophontid molluscs, disjunct coiling disappeared and umbilici became less common while the frequency of genera with sculpture increased. The abundance of brachiopod genera with spines on one or both valves increased dramatically. Sculpture became more pronounced and common among genera of coiled nautiloids. Inadunate and camerate crinoids showed a marked increase in spinosity, and all three crinoid subclasses tended to develop thicker thecal plates.

Trends toward increasing relative frequencies of predation-resistant features were formed in different ways. Bellerophontid genera lacking predation-resistant features tended to go extinct, leaving the sculptured, tighdy coiled forms as the predominant forms. Among Brachiopoda, the radiation of productids provided the tremendous increase in numbers of spinose genera. Among crinoids, predation-resistant features were acquired through evolution within established clades.

These observations suggest that predation by shell-crushing predators has been an important control on the morphology and composition of the marine invertebrate fauna since at least the Middle Devonian. The mid-Paleozoic radiation of durophages and response of the marine fauna was in many respects similar to events of the Mesozoic Marine Revolution, in effect, the Paleozoic precursor to that event.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Spring 1984 , pp. 229 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alexander, R. R. 1981. Predation scars preserved in Chesterian brachiopods: probable culprits and evolutionary consequences for the articulates. J. Paleontol. 55:192–203.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. R.In press. Resistance to and repair of shell-breakage induced by durophages in Late Ordovician brachiopods. J. Paleontol.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1893. The Crinoidea of Gotland. Pt. 1. The Crinoidea Inundata. Kongl. Svenska vetensk. Akad. Handb. Band 25, 200 pp.Google Scholar
Berg-Madsen, V. and Peel, J. S. 1978. Middle Cambrian monoplacohorans from Bornholm and Australia, and the systematic position of the bellerophontiform molluscs. Lethaia. 11:113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertness, M. D. and Cunningham, C. 1981. Crab shell-crushing predation and gastropod architectural defense. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 50:213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breimer, A. 1978. Autecology. Pp. T331–T345. In: Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C., eds. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part T. Echinodermata. Geol. Soc. Am.; Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1978. Host-specific pit-forming epizoans on Silurian crinoids. Lethaia. 11:217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. 1979. Anomalocaris, the largest known Cambrian arthropod. Palaeontology. 22:631–664.Google Scholar
Brunton, C. H. C. 1966. Predation and shell damage in a Visean brachiopod fauna. Paleontology. 9:355–359.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. and Westermann, G. E. G. 1976. Hydrodynamic properties of cephalopod shell ornamentation. Paleobiology. 2:316–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. H. 1915. A monograph of the existing crinoids. The comatulids, Pt. 1. U.S. Nad. Mus. Bull. 82:1–406.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. and Whittington, H. B. 1979. The animals of the Burgess Shale. Sci. Am. 241(1):122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copper, P. 1977. Paleolatitudes in the Devonian of Brazil and the Frasnian-Famennian mass extinction. Paleogeol. Paleoclim. Palaeocol. 21:165–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, R., Gertman, R., and Wiggett, G. 1973. Camouflage patterns in Nautilus, and their implications for cephalopod paleobiology. Lethaia. 6:201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, R. 1956. A review of the habitat of the earliest vertebrates. Fieldiana: Geology. 11:357–457.Google Scholar
Denison, R. 1978. Placodermi. In: Schultze, H.-P., ed. Handbook of Paleoichthyology. Gustav Fischer Verlag; Stuttgart. 128 pp.Google Scholar
Dott, R. H. Jr. and Batten, R. L. 1976. History of the Earth. 2nd ed.504 pp. McGraw-Hill; New York.Google Scholar
Gasiorowski, S. M. 1973. Les rhyncholites. Geobios. 6:127–196, 7 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldring, W. 1923. The Devonian crinoids of the State of New York. The N.Y. State Mus. Bull. 82:1–406.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1977. Eternal metaphors of palaeontology. Pp. 1–26. In: Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of Evolution. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1966. Spine arrangement and life habits of the productoid brachiopod Waageoconcha. J. Paleontol. 40:1063–1069.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1968. Structural adaptation in two Permian brachiopod genera, Salt Range, West Pakistan. J. Paleontol. 42:1–32.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1980. The human face of the brachiopod. J. Paleontol. 54:499–507.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1981. Living habits of ancient articulate brachiopods. Pp. 127–140. In: Broadhead, T. W., ed. Lophophorates. Univ. Tennessee, Dept. Geol. Sci. Studies in Geology 5.Google Scholar
Griffin, L. E. 1900. The anatomy of Nautilus pompilius. Mem. Natl. Acad. Sci. 8:100–230, 17 pls.Google Scholar
Harper, J. A. and Rollins, H. B. 1982. Recognition of Monoplacophora and Gastropoda in the fossil record: a functional morphological look at the bellerophont controversy. 3d N. Am. Paleontol. Conv., 1:227–232.Google Scholar
Hattin, D. E. 1958. Regeneration in a Pennsylvanian crinoid spine. J. Paleontol. 32:701.Google Scholar
Haugh, B. N. 1975. Digestive and coelomic systems of Mississippian camerate crinoids. J. Paleontol. 49:472–492.Google Scholar
Horny, R. J. 1963. Lower Paleozoic Bellerophontina (Gastropoda) of Bohemia. Sbornik Geol. Ved. Paleontol. 2:57–154, 44 pls.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. N. and Elner, R. W. 1979. Tactics of a predator, Carcinus maenas, and morphological responses of the prey, Nucella lapillus. J. Animal Ecol. 48:65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhaveri, R. B. 1969. Unterdevonische Gastropoden aus den Karnischen Alpen. Palaeontographica. 133A:146–176.Google Scholar
Kitching, J. A. and Lockwood, J. 1974. Observations on shell form and its ecological significance in thaiid gastropods of the genus Lepsiella in New Zealand. Mar. Biol. 28:131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitching, J. A., Muntz, L., and Ebling, F. J. 1966. The ecology of Lough Ine XV. The ecological significance of shell and body form in Nucella. J. Anim. Ecol. 35:113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudon, L. R. 1957. Crinoids. Pp. 961–971. In: Ladd, H. S., ed. Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology. Vol. 2. Mem. Geol. Soc. Am. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, E. G. Jr. 1971. Adaptation and Diversity. Freeman, Cooper; San Francisco.Google Scholar
Linsley, R. M. 1977. Some “laws” of gastropod shell form. Paleobiology. 3:196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malzahn, E. 1968. Über neue Funde von Janassa bituminosa (Schloth.) im niederrheinischen Zechstein. Geol. Jb. 85:67–96.Google Scholar
Malzahn, E. 1972. Zur Kenntnis der Kopfskeletts von Janassa bituminosa (Schloth.) aus dem hessischen Kupferschiefer. Geol Jb. 90:431–440.Google Scholar
Mapes, R. H. and Hansen, M. C. 1984. Pennsylvanian sharkcephalopod predation: a case study. Lethaia. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGhee, G. R. Jr. 1982. The Frasnian-Famennian extinction event: A preliminary analysis of Appalachian marine ecosystems. Pp. 491–500. In: Silver, L. T. and Schultz, P. H., eds. Geological Implications of Impacts of Large Asteroids and Comets on the Earth. Geol. Soc. Am. Sp. Paper 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, D. J. 1970. Time, life and boundaries. J. Paleontol. 44:801–815.Google Scholar
McLaren, D.J. 1982. Frasnian-Famennian extinctions. Pp. 477–484. In: Silver, L. T. and Schultz, P. H., eds. Geological Implications of Impacts of Large Asteroids and Comets on the Earth. Geol. Soc. Am. Sp. Paper 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. L. 1983. Evolutionary implications of predation on Recent reef-dwelling crinoids. Geol. Soc. Am. Abs. with Programs 15:644.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. and Ausich, W. I. 1981. Biotic interactions among Recent and fossil crinoids. Geol. Soc. Am. Abs. with Programs 13:510.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. and Ausich, W. I. 1983. Biotic interactions among Recent and among fossil crinoids. Pp. 377–427. In: Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L., eds. Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. L. and Macurda, D. B. Jr. 1977. Adaptive radiation of the comatulid crinoids. Paleobiology. 3:74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A. and Miles, R. S. 1971. Palaeozoic Fishes. 2d ed.W. B. Saunders Co.; Philadelphia. 259 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 100:65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1979. Fish predation and the evolution of gastropod shell sculpture: experimental and geographic evidence. Evolution. 33:697–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papp, A., Zapfe, H., Gachmayer, F., and Tauber, A. F. 1947. Lebensspüren mariner Krebse. K. Akad. der Wissen, Vienna, Mathem. Naturwiss. Klasse. Sitzber. 155:976–981.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. 1965. The phylogeny of the Chimaeroids. Proc. R. Soc. London. 249B:101–219.Google Scholar
Peel, J. S. 1975. A new Silurian gastropod from Wisconsin and the ecology of uncoiling in Palaeozoic gastropods. Bull. Geol. Soc. Denmark. 24:211–221.Google Scholar
Peel, J. S. 1980. A new Silurian retractile monoplacophoran and the origin of the gastropods. Proc. Geol. Assn. 91:91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotnick, R. E. 1983. Patterns in the evolution of Eurypterids. 416 pp. Unpub. Ph.D. dissertation. Univ. Chicago.Google Scholar
Pocock, K. J. 1974. A unique case of teratology in trilobite segmentation. Lethaia. 7:63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pojeta, J. Jr., and Runnegar, B. 1976. The palaeontology of rostroconch mollusks and the early history of the Phylum Mollusca. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 968. 88 pp. 54 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. J. Paleontol. 40:1178–1190.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1977. Stochastic models in evolutionary palaeontology. Pp. 59–78. In: Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of Evolution. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1981. Extinction: bad genes or bad luck? Acta Geol. Hispanica. 16:25–33.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. and Gould, S. J. 1974. Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology—towards a nomothetic paleontology. Syst. Zool. 23:305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, D. M., Gould, S. J., Schopf, T. J. M., and Simberloff, D. S. 1973. Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity. J. Geol. 81:525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. Mass extinction in the marine fossil record. Science. 215:1501–1503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reise, K. 1977. Predator exclusion experiments in an intertidal mud flat. Helgolander wiss. Meeresunters. 30:263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reznick, D. 1982. The impact of predation on life history evolution in trinidian guppies: genetic basis of observed life history patterns. Evolution. 36:1236–1250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolfe, W.D.I. 1969. Phyllocarida. Pp. R296–331. In: Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C., eds. Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, Pt. R., Arthropoda, Vol. 4 (1). Geol. Soc. Am.; Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. 3d ed.468 pp. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Rudkin, D. M. 1979. Healed injuries in Ogygopsis klutzi (Trilobita) from the Middle Cambrian of British Columbia. R. Ont. Mus. Life Sci., Occ. Pap. 32. 8 pp.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1965a. Ecology and paleoecology. Pp. H199–H214. In: Moores, R. C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. H, Brachiopoda. Vol. 2. Geol. Soc. Am.; Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1965b. Sensory spines in the Jurassic brachiopod Acanthothyris. Palaeontology. 8:604–607, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1970. Living and Fossil Brachiopods. Hutchinson Univ. Library; London. 199 pp.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B. and Jell, P. A. 1976. Australian Middle Cambrian molluscs and their bearing on early molluscan evolution. Alcheringa. 1:109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, W. B., Spinosa, C., Teichert, C., and Banks, R. C. 1978. The jaw apparatus of Recent Nautilus and its paleontological implications. Palaeontology. 21:129–142.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B. 1967. Comments on elasmobranch evolution. Pp. 3–35. In: Gilbert, P. W., Mathewson, R. F., and Rall, D. P., eds. Sharks, Skates, and Rays. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press; Baltimore.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1979. The genus Arcbaeocaris, and a general review of the Palaeostomatopoda (Hoplocarida: Malacostraca). San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist., Trans. 19:57–66.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1981. Late Paleozoic crustacean communities. J. Paleontol. 55:126–137.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1920. The Crinoidea Flexibilia. Smithsonian Inst. Publ. 2051, 486 pp.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. American Silurian crinoids. Smithsonian Inst. Publ. 2871. 239 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1974. What has happened to the articulate brachiopods? Geol. Soc. Am. Abs. with Programs. 6:966–967.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., Signor, P. W., Lidgard, S., and Karr, A. F. 1981. Natural clades differ from “random” clades: simulations and analyses. Paleobiology. 7:115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størmer, L. 1955. Merostomata. Pp. P4–P173. In: Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part P, Arthropoda Z. Geol. Soc. Am.; Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1976. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany. Part 5: Myriapoda and additional forms, with general remarks on fauna and problems regarding invasion of land by arthropods. Senckenbergiana Lethaia. 57:87–183.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. and Watkins, W. I. 1969. Carboniferous crinoids of Texas with stratigraphic implications. Palaeontol. Am. 6:141–275.Google Scholar
Teichert, C., Moore, R. C., and Zeller, D. E. N. 1964. Rhyncholites. Pp. K467–K484. In: Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part K, Mollusca. Vol. 3. Geol. Soc. Am.; Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1979. Biological bulldozers and the evolution of marine benthic communities. Science. 203:458–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thayer, C. W. 1981. Ecology of living brachiopods. Pp. 110–126. In: Broadhead, T. W., ed. Lophophorates. Univ. Tennessee, Dept. Geol. Sci., Studies in Geology 5.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1983. Sediment-mediated biological disturbance and the evolution of the marine benthos. Pp. 479–625. In: Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L., eds. Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, K. S. 1969. The biology of the lobe-finned fishes. Biol. Rev. 44:91–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ubaghs, G. 1978. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids. Pp. T58–T216. In: Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C., eds. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part T. Echinodermata. Geol. Soc. Am.; Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1975. Evolution and distribution of left handed and planispiral coiling in snails. Nature. 254:419–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic faunal revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology. 3:245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Biogeography and Adaptation. 332 pp. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1983. Shell-breaking predation through time. Pp. 649–669. In: Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L., eds. Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virnstein, R. W. 1977. The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay. Ecology. 58:1199–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorwald, G. R. 1982. Healed injuries in trilobites—evidence for a large Cambrian predator. Geol. Soc. Am. Abs. with Programs. 14:639.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. W. and Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard College Mus. Comp. Zool. Mem. 20–21, 897 pp.Google Scholar
Wanner, J. 1916. Die permishcen Echinodermen von Timor, Teil 2. Palaontologie von Timor. Pt. 6, No. 11. 329 pp.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D. 1981. Shell sculpture as a defensive adaptation in ammonoids. Paleobiology. 7:96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. D. and Wicksten, M. D. 1980. Food sources and feeding behavior of Nautilus macromphalus. Veliger. 23:119–124, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1971. Form, structure and function of shell and siphuncle in coiled Mesozoic ammonoids. Life Sciences Contr., R. Ont. Mus., No. 78. 39 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, H. B. and Briggs, D. E. G. 1982. A new conundrum from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Proc. N. Am. Paleontol. Conv. 2:573–575.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1971. A new Late Devonian gastropod and its bearing on problems of open coiling and septation. In: Dutro, J. T., ed. Paleozoic Perspectives: A Paleontologic Tribute to G. Arthur Cooper. Smithson. Contr. Paleobiol. 3:321–341.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1978. An alternative approach to the interpretation of the phytogeny of ancient mollusks. Malacologia. 17:165–191.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. 1981. Chondrichthyes 1, Paleozoic Elasmobranchii. In: Schultze, H.-P., ed., Handbook of Paleoichthyology. Gustav Fischer Verlag; Stuttgart. 114 pp.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. and Richardson, E. S. Jr. 1963. The paleoecological history of two Pennsylvanian black shales. Fieldiana: Geol. Mem. 4. 325 pp.Google Scholar