Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:08:15.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mass Extinctions as Statistical Phenomena: An Examination of the Evidence Using χ2 Tests and Bootstrapping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Alan E. Hubbard
Affiliation:
ARCO Oil and Gas Company, P.O. Box 1346, Houston, Texas 77251
Norman L. Gilinsky
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24

Abstract

Although much natural historical evidence has been adduced in support of the occurrence of several mass extinctions during the Phanerozoic, unambiguous statistical confirmation of the mass extinction phenomenon has remained elusive. Using bootstrapping techniques that have not previously been applied to the study of mass extinction, we have amassed strong or very strong statistical evidence for mass extinctions (see text for definitions) during the Late Ordovician, Late Permian, and Late Cretaceous. Bootstrapping therefore verifies three of the mass extinction events that were proposed by Raup and Sepkoski (1982). A small amount of bootstrapping evidence is also presented for mass extinctions in the Induan (Triassic) and Coniacean (Cretaceous) Stages, but high overall turnover rates (including high origination) in the Induan and uncertain estimates of the temporal duration of the Coniacean force us to conclude that the evidence is not compelling.

We also present the results of more liberal X2 tests of the differences between expected and observed numbers of familial extinctions for stratigraphic stages. In addition to verifying the mass extinctions identified using bootstrapping, these analyses suggest that several stages that could not be verified as mass extinction stages using bootstrapping (including the last three in the Devonian, and the Norian Stage of the Triassic) should still be regarded as candidates for mass extinction. Further analysis will be required to test these stages in more detail.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Birkelund, T., and Bromley, R. G., eds. The Upper Cretaceous and Danian of NW Europe. Publications DU 26° Congrèss Géologique International, Paris.Google Scholar
Boyajian, G. E. 1988. Mass vs. background extinction: no difference on the basis of taxon age distributions. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 20: A105.Google Scholar
Brenchley, P. J. 1989. The late Ordovician extinction. Pp. 104132in Donovan 1989.Google Scholar
Connor, E. F., ed. 1989. Periodic extinctions in earth history. Ecology 70: 801834.Google Scholar
Crick, R. E. 1981. Diversity and evolutionary rates of Cambro-Ordovician nautiloids. Paleobiology 7: 216229.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. 1989. Mass extinctions. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Fox, W. T. 1987. Harmonic analysis of periodic extinctions. Paleobiology 13: 157171.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L. 1988. Survivorship in the Bivalvia: comparing living and extinct genera and families. Paleobiology 14: 370386.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L., and Bambach, R. K.. 1986. The evolutionary bootstrap: a new approach to the study of taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 12: 251268.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L., and Bambach, R. K.. 1987. Asymmetrical patterns of origination and extinction in higher taxa. Paleobiology 13: 427445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L., and Good, I. J.. 1989. Analysis of clade shape using queueing theory and the fast Fourier transform. Paleobiology 15: 321333.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L., and Hubbard, A. E.. 1990. Mass extinctions evaluated in relation to characteristic extinction intensities of families within orders. Abstracts of the Fourth International Congress on Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, p. 111.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., Young, N. D., and Kasson, B.. 1985. The consequences of being different: sinistral coiling in Cerion. Evolution 39: 13641379.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Armstrong, R. L., Cox, A. V., Craig, L. E., Smith, A. G., and Smith, D. G.. 1989. A geologic time scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hubbard, A. E. 1990. Statistical analysis of extinction in the marine fossil record. Unpublished M.S. Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1986. Causes and consequences of mass extinctions: a comparative approach. Pp. 183229In Elliott, D. K., ed. Dynamics of extinction. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1984. The fabric of Cretaceous mass extinctions. Pp. 151246In Berggren, W. A. and Van Couvering, J. A., eds. Catastrophes and earth history. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Kitchell, J. A., Estabrook, G., and MacLeod, N.. 1987. Testing for equality of rates of evolution. Paleobiology 13: 272285.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W. D. 1989. The end Permian mass extinction. Pp. 152173in Donovan 1989.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1985. Mass extinction patterns of marine invertebrate groups and some implications for a causal phenomenon. Paleobiology 11: 227233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moses, C. O. 1989. A geochemical perspective on the causes and periodicity of mass extinctions. Ecology 70: 812823.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1967. Revolutions in the history of life. Pp. 6391In Albritton, C. C. Jr., ed. Uniformity and simplicity: a symposium on the principle of the uniformity of nature. Geological Society of America Special Paper 89.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1983. The Decade of North American Geology 1983 geologic time scale. Geology 11: 503504.Google Scholar
Percival, S. F., and Fischer, A. G.. 1977. Changes in calcareous nannoplankton in the Cretaceous-Tertiary biotic crisis at Zumaya, Spain. Evolutionary Theory 2: 135.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. F. 1983. Mass extinctions in the fossil record. Science (Washington, D.C.) 219: 12391241.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. F. 1987. On the statistical detection of cycles in extinctions in the fossil record. Paleobiology 13: 465478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Boyajian, G. E.. 1988. Patterns of generic extinction in the fossil record. Paleobiology 14: 109125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raup, D. M., and Marshall, L. G.. 1980. Variation between groups in evolutionary rates: a statistical test of significance. Paleobiology 6: 923.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science (Washington, D.C.) 215: 15011503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raup, D. M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. Periodicity of extinctions in the geological past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 81: 801805.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1986. Periodic extinction of families and genera. Science 231: 833836.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1988. Testing for periodicity of extinction. Science 241: 9496.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. A compendium of fossil marine families. Contributions, Milwaukee Public Museum 51: 1125.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1986. Phanerozoic overview of mass extinction. Pp. 277296In Raup, D. M. and Jablonski, D., eds. Patterns and processes in the history of life. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., and Raup, D. M.. 1986. Periodicity in marine extinction events. Pp. 1136In Elliott, D. K., ed. Dynamics of extinction. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Sorauf, J. E., and Pedder, A.E.H.. 1986. Late Devonian rugose corals and the Frasnian-Famennian crisis. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 23: 12651287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, S. M., and Wagner, M. J.. 1987. A substantial bias in nonparametric tests for periodicity in geophysical data. Science (Washington, D.C.) 238: 940941.Google Scholar
Surlyk, F., and Johansen, M. B.. 1984. End-Cretaceous brachiopod extinctions in the chalk of Denmark. Science (Washington, D.C.) 223: 11741177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Valen, L. M. 1985. How constant is extinction? Evolutionary Theory 7: 93106.Google Scholar