Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:23:01.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of a high-risk environment on edge-drilling behavior: inference from Recent bivalves from the Red Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Devapriya Chattopadhyay ,
Martin Zuschin  and
Adam Tomašových
Devapriya Chattopadhyay
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, IISER-Kolkata, Mohanpur WB-741252, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Martin Zuschin
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Department of Paleontology, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Adam Tomašových
Affiliation:
Geological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, Bratislava 84005, Slovakia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Edge-drilling is an unusual predation pattern in which a predatory gastropod drills a hole on the commissure between the valves of a bivalve. Although it is faster than wall drilling, it involves the potential risk of amputating the drilling organ. We therefore hypothesize that this risky strategy is advantageous only in environments where predators face high competition or predation pressure while feeding. The high frequency of edge-drilling (EDF, relative to the total number of drilled valves) in a diverse Recent bivalve assemblage from the Red Sea enables us to test this hypothesis, predicting (1) a low EDF in infaunal groups, (2) a high EDF in bivalves with elongated shape, (3) high incidence of edge-drilling in groups showing a high wall-drilling frequency, and (4) high EDF in shallow habitats. We evaluate these predictions based on >15,000 bivalve specimens. Among ecological attributes, we found substrate affinity and predation intensity of a species to be good predictors of edge-drilling incidence. Infaunal taxa with high length/width ratio have a low EDF, in accordance with our predictions. Predation intensity is also a significant predictor of edge-drilling; groups with high predation intensity show higher incidence of edge-drilling, confirming our prediction. Although water depth fails to show any significant effect on EDF, this analysis generally supports the high-risk hypothesis of edge-drilling incidence because shallow depths have considerable microhabitat variability. Classically the drill hole site selection has often been linked to predatory behavior. Our study indicates that prey attributes are also crucial in dictating the behavioral traits of a driller such as site selection. This calls for considering such details of the prey to fully understand predation in modern and fossil habitats. Moreover, this perspective is important for tackling the longstanding riddle of the limited temporal and spatial distribution of edge-drilling.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , Winter 2014 , pp. 34 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, L. C., Geary, D. H., Nehm, R. H., and Allmon, W. D. 1991. A comparative study of naticid gastropod predation on Varicorbula caloosae and Chione cancellata, Plio-Pleistocene of Florida, U.S.A. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeo-ecology 85:29–46.Google Scholar
Ansell, A. D. 1960. Observations on predation of Venus striatella (Da Costa) by Natica alderi Forbes. Proceedings of Malacological Society 34:157–164.Google Scholar
Ansell, A. D., and Morton, B. 1987. Alternative predation tactics of a tropical naticid gastropod. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 111:109–119.Google Scholar
Bardhan, S., Das, S. S., Mallick, S. S., Mondal, S., and Dutta, R. 2012a. The record of oldest naticid gastropod from the Oxfordian (Upper Jurassic) of Kutch, India: paleontological implications. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 44:88.Google Scholar
Bardhan, S., Chattopadhyay, D., Mondal, S., Das, S. S., Mallick, S., Roy, A., and Chanda, P. 2012b. Record of intense predatory drilling from Upper Jurassic bivalves of Kutch, India: implications for the history of biotic interaction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 317–318:153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C. J., and Nishenko, S. 1975. Stereotypy of predatory boring behavior of Pleistocene naticid gastropods. Paleobiology 1:258–260.Google Scholar
Burrell, V. G. Jr. 1975. One oyster's solution to the drill problem. Veliger 17:334 + Figs. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Cadée, G. C., Walker, S. E., and Flessa, K. W. 1997. Gastropod shell repair in the intertidal of Bahia la Choya (N. Gulf of California). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 136:67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriker, M. R. 1981. Shell penetration and feeding by naticacean and muricacean predatory gastropods: a synthesis. Malacologia 20:403–422.Google Scholar
Casey, M. M., and Chattopadhyay, D. 2008. Clumping behavior as a strategy against drilling predation: implications for the fossil record. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 367:174–179.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, D. 2011. First evidence of predatory drilling from Upper Cretaceous Eutaw formation (Santonian), Georgia. Southeastern Geology 48:37–44.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, D., and Baumiller, T. K. 2007. Drilling under threat: an experimental assessment of the drilling behavior of Nucella lamellosa in the presence of a predator. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 352:257–266.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, D., and Baumiller, T. K. 2009. An experimental assessment of feeding rates of the muricid gastropod Nucella lamellosa and its effect on a cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Shellfish Research 28:883–889Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, D., and Baumiller, T. K. 2010. Effect of durophagy on drilling predation: a case study of Cenozoic molluscs from North America. Historical Biology 22:367–379.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, D., and Dutta, S. 2013. Prey selection by drilling predators: a case study from Miocene of Kutch, India. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 374:187–196.Google Scholar
Davies, D. J., Powell, E. N., and Stanton, R. J. Jr. 1989. Relative rates of shell dissolution and net sediment accumulation—a commentary: can shell beds form by the gradual accumulation of biogenic debris on the sea floor? Lethaia 22:207–212.Google Scholar
Deline, B., Baumiller, T., Kaplan, P., Kowalewski, M., and Hoffmeister, A. P. 2003. Edge-drilling on the brachiopod Perditocardinia cf. P. dubia from the Mississippian of Missouri (USA). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 201:211–219.Google Scholar
Dietl, G. P., and Alexander, R. R. 2000. Post-Miocene shift in stereotypic naticid predation on confamilial prey from the mid-Atlantic shelf: coevolution with dangerous prey. Palaios 15:414–429.Google Scholar
Dietl, G. P., and Herbert, G. S. 2005. Influence of alternative shell-drilling behaviours on attack duration of the predatory snail, Chicoreus dilectus. Journal of Zoology 265:201–206.Google Scholar
Dietl, G. P., Alexander, R. R., Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A. 2001. Stereotypy of naticid predation on bivalves since the Cretaceous: trends, controlling factors, and implications for escalation. PaleoBios 21(Suppl. to No. 2):78.Google Scholar
Dietl, G. P., Herbert, G. S., and Vermeij, G. J. 2004. Reduced competition and altered feeding behavior among marine snails after a mass extinction. Science 306:2229–2231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordillo, S., and Archuby, F. 2012. Predation by drilling gastropods and asteroids upon mussels in rocky shallow shores of southernmost South America: paleontological implications. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57:633–646.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., and Ryan, P. D. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(9). http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. A., and Kelley, P. H. 1995. Spatial variation of naticid gastropod predation in the Eocene of North America. Palaios 10:268–278.Google Scholar
Harper, E. M. 2003. Assessing the importance of drilling predation over the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 210:185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, E. M. 2006. Dissecting post-Palaeozoic arms races. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232:322–343.Google Scholar
Hart, M. W., and Palmer, A. R. 1987. Stereotype, ontogeny, and heritability of drill site selection in thaidid gastropods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 107:101–120.Google Scholar
Heinberg, C. 1979. Evolutionary ecology of nine sympatric species of the pelecypod Limopsis in Cretaceous chalk. Lethaia 12:325–340.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, A. P., and Kowalewski, M. 2001. Spatial and environmental variation in the fossil record of drilling predation: a case study from the Miocene of central Europe. Palaios 16:566–579.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. N., and Dunkin, S. B. 1984. Behavioural components of prey selection by dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.), feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis (L.), in the laboratory: Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 77:45–68.Google Scholar
Huntley, J. W., and Kowalewski, M. 2007. Strong coupling of predation intensity and diversity in the Phanerozoic fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:15006–15010.Google Scholar
Hutchings, J. A., and Herbert, G. S. 2013. No honor among snails: conspecific competition leads to incomplete drill holes by a naticid gastropod. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 379–380:32–38.Google Scholar
Ishida, S. 2004. Initial predation and parasitism by muricid whelks demonstrated by the correspondence between drilled holes and their apparent enveloper. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 305:233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., and Leonard-Pingel, S. 2011. Differences in predation rate in bivalve taxa. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 43:378.Google Scholar
Janssen, R., Zuschin, M., and Baal, Ch. 2011. Gastropods and their habitats from the northern Red Sea (Egypt: Safaga), Part 2. Caenogastropoda: Sorbeoconcha and Littorinimorpha. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 113A:373–509.Google Scholar
Kabat, A. R. 1990. Predatory ecology of naticid gastropods with a review of shell boring predation. Malacologia 32:155–193.Google Scholar
Kabat, A. R., and Kohn, A. J. 1986. Predation on early Pleistocene naticid gastropods in Fiji. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 53:255–269.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H. 1988. Predation by Miocene gastropods of the Chesapeake Group: stereotyped and predictable. Palaios 3:436–448.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A. 1993. Evolution of the naticid gastropod predator–prey system: an evaluation of the hypothesis of escalation. Palaios 8:358–375.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A. 1996. Recovery of the naticid gastropod predator-prey system from the Cretaceous-Tertiary and Eocene-Oligocene extinctions. Geological Society of London Special Publication 102:373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A. 2003. The fossil record of drilling predation on bivalves and gastropods. Pp. 113–139in Kelley et al. 2003.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H., Kowalewski, M., and Hansen, T. A., eds. 2003. Predator-prey interactions in the fossil record. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A. 2007. A case for cannibalism: confamilial and conspecific predation by naticid gastropods, Cretaceous through Pleistocene of the United States Coastal Plain. Pp. 151–170inElewa, A. M. T., ed. Predation in organisms: a distinct phenomenon. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., Best, M. M. R., and Kaufman, D. S. 2005. Taphonomic tradeoffs in tropical marine death assemblages: differential time averaging, shell loss, and probable bias in siliciclastic vs. carbonate facies. Geology 33:729–732.Google Scholar
Kitchell, J. A. 1986. The evolution of predator–prey behavior: naticid gastropods and their molluscan prey. Pp. 88–110inNitecki, M. and Kitchell, J. A., eds. Evolution of animal behavior: paleontological and field approaches. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kitchell, J. A., Boggs, C. H., Kitchell, J. F., and Rice, J. A. 1981. Prey selection by naticid gastropods: experimental tests and application to the fossil record. Paleobiology 7:533–552.Google Scholar
Klompmaker, A. A. 2011. Drilling and crushing predation on scaphopods from the Miocene of the Netherlands. Lethaia 44:429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosnik, M. A., Jablonski, D., Lockwood, R., and Novack-Gottshall, P. M. 2006. Quantifying molluscan body size in evolutionary and ecological analyses: maximizing the return on data-collection efforts. Palaios 21:588–597.Google Scholar
Kosnik, M. A., Hua, Q., Kaufman, D. S., and Wust, R. A. 2009. Taphonomic bias and time-averaging in tropical molluscan death assemblages: differential shell half-lives in Great Barrier Reef sediment. Paleobiology 35:565–586.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. 2002. The fossil record of predation: an overview of analytical methods. InKowalewski, M. and Kelley, P. H., eds. The fossil record of predation. Paleontological Society Papers 8:3–42. Yale University, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. 2004. Drill holes produced by the predatory gastropod Nucella lamellosa (Muricidae): paleobiological and ecological implications. Journal of Molluscan Studies 70:359–370.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Dulai, A., and Fürsich, F. T. 1998. A fossil record full of holes: the Phanerozoic history of drilling predation. Geology 26:1091–1094.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, L. R. 2001. Evaluating the accuracy of drilling frequency as an estimate of prey preference and predation intensity. PaleoBios 21 (Suppl. to No. 2):83.Google Scholar
Martinelli, J. C., Gordillo, S., and Archuby, F. 2013. Muricid drilling predation at high latitudes: Insights from the southernmost Atlantic. Palaios 28:33–41.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondal, S., Hutchings, J., and Herbert, G. S. 2012. Obligatory edge-drilling by naticid gastropod Polinices lacteus from Florida. Florida United Malacologists (FUM) Conference, Sanibel Island, Fla., Abstracts, p. 10.Google Scholar
Morissette, S., and Himmelman, J. H. 2000. Subtidal food thieves: interactions of four invertebrate kleptoparasites with the sea star Leptasterias polaris. Animal Behaviour 60:531–543.Google Scholar
Morton, B. 1994. Prey preference and method of attack by Rapana bezoar (Gastropoda: Muricidae) from Hong Kong. Pp. 309–325inMorton, B., ed. The malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China III. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Oliver, P. G., and Allen, J. A. 1980. The functional and adaptive morphology of the deep-sea species of the family Limopsidae (Bivalvia: Arcoidea) from the Atlantic. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 291:77–125.Google Scholar
Patterson Edward, J. K., Ramesh, X. M., and Ayakkannu, K. 1992. Comparative study of holes in bivalves, chipped and bored by the muricid gastropods Chicoreus ramosus, Chicoreus virgineus and Murex tribulus. Phuket Marine Biological Center Special Publication 11:106–110.Google Scholar
Piller, W. E. 1994. The northern Bay of Safaga (Red Sea, Egypt): an actuopalaeontological approach. IV. Thin section analysis. Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Österreich18:1–73.Google Scholar
Piller, W. E., and Mansour, A. 1990. The Northern Bay of Safaga (Red Sea, Egypt): an actuopalaeontological approach. II. Sediment analyses and sedimentary facies. Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Österreich 16:1–102.Google Scholar
Piller, W. E., and Pervesler, P. 1989. The Northern Bay of Safaga (Red Sea, Egypt): an actuopalaeontological approach. I. Topography and bottom facies. Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Österreich 15:103–147.Google Scholar
Quinn, G. P., and Keough, M. J. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
R Core Development Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Roller, R. A., Garton, D. W., and Stickle, W. B. 1984. Regeneration of the proboscis, radula and odontophoral cartilage of the southern oyster drill Thais Haemastoma canaliculata (Gray) (Prosobranchia: Muricidae) after amputation. American Malacological Bulletin 2:63–73.Google Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D., and Beussink, A. 1999. Extinction and naticid predation of the bivalve Chione von Muehlfeld in the late Neogene of Florida. Palaeontologia Electronica 2 (1).Google Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D., and Willard, S. 2001. Bivalve prey morphology as a guide to drilling stereotypy of naticid and muricid gastropods: venerids, naticids and muricids in tropical America. PaleoBios 21 (Suppl. to No. 2):109–110.Google Scholar
Roy, K. 1996. The roles of mass extinction and biotic interaction in large-scale replacement: a reexamination using the fossil record of stromboidean gastropods. Paleobiology 22:436–452.Google Scholar
Sander, F., and Lalli, C. M. 1982. A comparative study of the mollusk communities on the shelf-slope margin of Barbados, West Indies. Veliger 24:309–318.Google Scholar
Savazzi, E. 1984. Functional morphology and autecology of Pseudoptera (bakevelliid bivalves, Upper Cretaceous of Portugal). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 46:313–324.Google Scholar
Sawyer, J. A., and Zuschin, M. 2010. Intensities of drilling predation of molluscan assemblages along a transect through the northern Gulf of Trieste (Adriatic Sea). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 285:152–173.Google Scholar
Sawyer, J. A., and Zuschin, M. 2011. Drilling predation in mollusks from the Lower and Middle Miocene of the Central Paratethys. Palaios. 26:284–297.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1972. Functional morphology and evolution of byssally attached bivalve mollusks. Journal of Paleontology 46:165–212.Google Scholar
Stump, T. E. 1975. Pleistocene molluscan paleoecology and community structure of the Puerto Libertad region, Sonora, Mexico. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 17:177–226.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-S. 2003. Feeding ecology of common intertidal Muricidae (Mollusca: Neogastropoda) from the Burrup Peninsula, Western Australia. Pp. 173–192inWells, F. E., Walker, D. I., and Jones, D. S., eds. The marine flora and fauna of Dampier, Western Australia. Western Australian Museum, Perth.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. D. K. 1976. Gastropod predation on sympatric Neogene species of Glycymeris (Bivalvia) from the eastern United States. Journal of Paleontology 50:488–499.Google Scholar
Tomašových, A., and Zuschin, M. 2009. Variation in brachiopod preservation along a carbonate shelf-basin transect (Red Sea and Gulf of Aden): environmental sensitivity of taphofacies. Palaios 24:697–716.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. H. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators, and grazers. Paleobiology 3:245–258.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. H. 1980. Drilling predation of bivalves in Guam: some paleoecological implications. Malacologia 19:329–334.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. H. 1987. Evolution and escalation: an ecological history of life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. H. 1994. The evolutionary interaction among species: selection, escalation, and coevolution. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 25:219–236.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. H. 2001. Edge-drilling: history and distribution of a novel method of predation. PaleoBios 21:130.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Carlson, S. J. 2000. The muricid gastropod subfamily Rapaninae: phylogeny and ecological history. Paleobiology 26:19–46.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Roopnarine, P. D. 2001. Edge-drilling: history and distribution of a novel method of predation. PaleoBios 21 (Suppl. to No. 2):130.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., Schindel, D. E., and Zipser, E. 1981. Predation through geological time: evidence from gastropod shell repair. Science 214:1024–1026.Google Scholar
von Rützen-Kositzkau, B. 1999. Taphonomie und Biogeographie des hartteiltragenden Makrobenthos im Tiefwasser des Roten Meeres. Beringeria 24:2–150.Google Scholar
Walker, S. E. 2001. Paleoecology of gastropods preserved in turbiditic slope deposits from the Upper Pliocene of Ecuador. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 166:141–163.Google Scholar
Wells, H. W. 1958. Feeding habits of Murex fulvescens. Ecology 39:556–558.Google Scholar
Ziegelmeier, E. 1954. Beobachtungen uber den Nahrungserwerb bei der Naticide Lunatia nitida Donovan (Gastropoda Prosobranchia). Helgolander Wissenschaftliche Meeresforschung 5:1–33.Google Scholar
Zuschin, M., and Hohenegger, J. 1998. Subtropical coral-reef associated sedimentary facies characterized by molluscs (Northern Bay of Safaga, Red Sea, Egypt). Facies 38:229–254.Google Scholar
Zuschin, M., Hohenegger, J., and Steininger, F. F. 2000. A comparison of living and dead molluscs on coral reef associated hard substrata in the northern Red Sea—implications for the fossil record. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 159:167–190.Google Scholar
Zuschin, M., Hohenegger, J., and Steininger, F. F. 2001. Molluscan assemblages on coral reefs and associated hard substrata in the Northern Red Sea. Coral Reefs 20:107–116.Google Scholar
Zuschin, M., and Oliver, P. G. 2003. Bivalves and bivalve habitats in the northern Red Sea. The Northern Bay of Safaga (Red Sea, Egypt): an actuopalaeontological approach. VI. Bivalvia. Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien.Google Scholar
Zuschin, M., and Oliver, P. G. 2005. Diversity patterns of bivalves in a coral dominated shallow-water bay in the northern Red Sea: high species richness on a local scale. Marine Biology Research 1:396–410Google Scholar