Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:21:37.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Taxonomic Corrections on Phanerozoic Generic Richness Trends in Marine Bivalves with a Discussion on the Clade’s Overall History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2015

Subhronil Mondal  and
Peter J. Harries
Subhronil Mondal
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. NES107, Tampa, FL 33620-5250, U.S.A. E-mail:[email protected], [email protected].
Peter J. Harries
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. NES107, Tampa, FL 33620-5250, U.S.A. E-mail:[email protected], [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study uses a comprehensive, revised, and updated global bivalve dataset combining information from two major databases available to study temporal trends in Phanerozoic bivalve richness: the Sepkoski Compendium and the Paleobiology Database. This compilation results in greater taxonomic and stratigraphic coverage than possible with either of the two databases alone. However, there are challenges in directly comparing these two sources due to differences in their taxonomic designations and stratigraphic range information. Moreover, both of these datasets are fraught with a number of taxonomic errors, which can significantly bias the overall richness estimate. Additionally, a substantial number of taxonomic corrections were made before a new Phanerozoic bivalve richness curve was produced. The new generic taxonomic curve is comparable with the trajectory of the Sepkoski’s modern fauna and shows rapid and substantial diversification through the Ordovician, followed by a Paleozoic plateau, a Mesozoic high, and Cenozoic diversification after a small reduction in richness associated with the K/Pg extinction. The steep Cenozoic rise documented in the raw richness curve derived from the new dataset is likely real, and reflects the overall robustness and completeness of the bivalve fossil record.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 157 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adrain, J. M., and Westrop, S. R.. 2000. An empirical assessment of taxic paleobiology. Science 289:110–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, P. A., and Briggs, D. E. G.. 1993. Paleolatitudinal sampling bias, Phanerozoic species diversity, and the end-Permian extinction. Geology 21:65–68.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alroy, J. 2002. How many named species are valid? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:3706–3711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alroy, J. 2010. The Shifting balance of diversity among major marine animal groups. Science 329:1191–1194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alroy, J., Marshall, C. R., Bambach, R. K., et al. 2001. Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:6261–6266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alroy, J., Aberhan, M., Bottjer, D. J., et al. 2008. Phanerozoic trends in the global diversity of marine invertebrates. Science 321:97–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ausich, W. I., and Bottjer, D. J.. 1982. Tiering in Suspension-Feeding Communities on Soft Substrata throughout the Phanerozoic. Science 216:173–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ausich, W. I., and Peters, S. E.. 2005. A revised macroevolutionary history for Ordovician–Early Silurian crinoids. Paleobiology 31:538–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1983. Ecospace utilization and guilds in marine communities through the Phanerozoic. Pp. 719–746in M. Tevesz and P. McCall, eds. Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1990. Late Palaeozoic provinciality in the marine realm. Geological Society, London, Memoirs 12:307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1999. Energetics in the global marinefauna: A connection between terrestrial diversification and change in the marine biosphere. Geobios 32:131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K., Knoll, A. H., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 2002. Anatomical and Ecological Constraints on Phanerozoic Animal Diversity in the Marine Realm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:6854–6859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bambach, R. K., Knoll, A. H., and Wang, S. C.. 2004. Origination, extinction, and mass depletions of marine diversity. Paleobiology 30:522–542.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K., Bush, A. M., and Erwin, D. H.. 2007. Autecology and the filling of ecospace: key metazoan radiations. Palaeontology 50:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, M. J. 1993. The fossil record 2. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. 1998. The quality of the fossil record of the vertebrates. Pp. 269–303in S. K. Donovan and C. R. C. Paul, eds. The adequacy of the fossil record. Wiley, NY.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. 2001. Biodiversity on land and in the sea. Geological Journal 36:211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, M. J., Wills, M. A., and Hitchin, R.. 2000. Quality of the fossil record through time. Nature 403:534–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bretsky, P. W. 1973. Evolutionary patterns in the Paleozoic Bivalvia: documentation and some theoretical considerations. Geological Society of America Bulletin 84:2079–2096.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A. M., Markey, M. J., and Marshall, C. R.. 2004. Removing bias from diversity curves: the effects of spatially organized biodiversity on sampling-standardization. Paleobiology 30:666–686.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A. M., and Bambach, R. K.. 2011. Paleoecologic megatrends in marine metazoa. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 39:241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. G., Cristian, R. A., Anderson, L. C., et al. 2012. Illustrated Glossary of the Bivalvia. Pp. 2153–4012 in Treatise Online. Part N, Revised, Volume 1, Chapter 31.Google Scholar
Clapham, M. E., and Bottjer, D. J.. 2007. Permian marine paleoecology and its implications for large-scale decoupling of brachiopod and bivalve abundance and diversity during the Lopingian (Late Permian). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 249:283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, K. M., Finney, S., and Gibbard, P. L.. 2012. International Chronostratigraphic Chart: International Commission on Stratigraphy.Google Scholar
Gradstein, F. M, Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. D., et al. 2012. The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Boston, USA, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Connolly, S. R., and Miller, A. I.. 2001. Joint estimation of sampling and turnover rates from fossil databases: capture-mark- recapture methods revisited. Paleobiology 27:751–767.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crame, J. A. 2000. Evolution of taxonomic diversity gradients in the marine realm: evidence from the composition of Recent bivalve faunas. Paleobiology 26:188–214.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, J. S., Foote, M., Beau, A. G., et al. 2006. Second-order sequence stratigraphic controls on the quality of the fossil record at an active margin. New Zealand Eocene to Recent shelf molluscs. Palaios 21:86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, L. R., Newell, N. D., Boyd, D. W., et al. 1969. Mollusca. Pp. 2–129in R. C. Moore, ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part N, Bivalvia, vol. 1–2. Geological Society of America & University of Kansas Press. Boulder & Lawrence.Google Scholar
Cutbill, J. L., and Funnell, B. M.. 1967. Numerical analysis of the fossil record. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2:791–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, J. V., Nicholas, D., and Romesburg, H. C.. 2013. Literature searches with Google Scholar: Knowing what you are and are not getting. GSA Today 23:44–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunhill, A. M., Benton, M. J., Twitchett, R. J., et al. 2012. Completeness of the fossil record and the validity of sampling proxies at outcrop level. Palaeontology 55:1155–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Z. 2006. An introduction to Ordovician bivalves of southern China, with a discussion of the early evolution of the Bivalvia. Geological Journal 41:303–328.Google Scholar
Fang, Z., and Sánchez, T. M.. 2012. Origin and early evolution of the Bivalvia. Pp. 1+-21 inTreatise Online, Part N, Revised, Volume 1, Chapter 16.Google Scholar
Flessa, K. W., and Jablonski, D. 1995. Biogeography of Recent marine bivalve molluscs and its implications for paleobiogeography and the geography of extinction: a progress report. Historical Biology 10:25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, P. C., and Carlson, S. J.. 2006. Examining the latitudinal diversity gradient in Paleozoic terebratulide brachiopods: should singleton data be removed? Paleobiology 32:367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, M. 2000. Origination and extinction components of taxonomic diversity: general problems. Paleobiology 26:74–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1999. Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record. Nature 398:415–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foote, M., and Miller, A. I.. 2007. Principles of Paleontology freeman and Company, NY.Google Scholar
Fraiser, M. L., and Bottjer, D. J.. 2007. When bivalves took over the World. Paleobiology 33:397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J., and Williams, P. H.. 1993. Mapping the world’s species-the higher taxon approach. Biodiversity Letters 1:2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Calloway, C. B.. 1980. Clams and brachiopods-ships that pass in the night. Paleobiology 6:383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A., and Miller, A. I.. 1988. Extinction and survival in the Bivalvia. Pp. 121–138in G. P. Larwood, ed. Extinction and Survival in the Fossil Record. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harnik, P. G., and Lockwood, R.. 2011. Extinction in the marine Bivalvia. Pp. 1–24 in Treatise Online, Part N, Revised, Volume 1, Chapter 24.Google Scholar
Harper, E. M. 1998. The fossil record of bivalve molluscs. Pp. 243–267in S. K. Donovan, and C. R. C. Paul, eds. The adequacy of the fossil record. Wiley, NY.Google Scholar
Harper, E. M., Todd, J. P., and Alphey, J. R.. 1997. Evolutionary response by bivalves to changing Phanerozoic sea-water chemistry. Geological Magazine 134:403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendy, A. J. W. 2009. Lithification and the measurement of biodiversity. Paleobiology 35:51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendy, A. J. W. 2011. Taphonomic overprints on Phanerozoic trends in biodiversity: Lithification and other secular megabiases. Pp. 19–77in P. A. Allison, and D. J. Bottjer, eds. Taphonomy: process and bias through time. Topics in Geobiology 32, Springer, Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D., Roy, K., Valentine, J. W., Price, R. M., et al. 2003. The impact of the pull of the Recent on the history of marine diversity. Science 300:1133–1135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, J. B., and Johnson, K. B.. 2001. Measuring past biodiversity. Science 293:2401–2404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K. G. 2003. New data for old questions. Paleobiology 29:19–21.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. 2005. Shell composition has no net impact on large-scale evolutionary patterns in mollusks. Science 307:914–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, A. I. 1988. Spatio-temporal transitions in Paleozoic Bivalvia; an analysis of North American fossil assemblages. Historical Biology 1:251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1990a. Bivalves. Pp. 143–161in K. J. McNamara, ed. Evolutionary Trends. Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1990b. The relationship between global diversification and spatio-temporal transitions in Paleozoic Bivalvia. Pp. 85–98. in A. I. Miller, ed. Paleocommunity temporal dynamics: The long-term development of multispecies assemblies. Paleontological Society Special Publication 3, USA.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1988. Modeling bivalve diversification; the effect of interaction on a macroevolutionarysystem. Paleobiology 14:364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevesskaya, L. A. 2008. Dynamics of taxonomic diversity of bivalves in the Phanerozoic. Paleontological Journal 42:335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paleobiology Database. 2014. http://paleobiodb.org/, accessed 3rd May 2013.Google Scholar
Patterson, C., and Smith, A. B.. 1987. Is the periodicity of extinctions a taxonomic artefact? Nature 330:248–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1998. Adequacy, completeness, and the fossil record. Pp. 1–28in S. K. Donovan, and C. R. C. Paul, eds. The Adequacy of the Fossil Record. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1982. The adequacy of the fossil record. Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E. 2005. Geological constraints on the macroevolutionary history of marine animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102:12326–12331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, S. E. 2006. Genus extinction, origination, and the durations of sedimentary hiatuses. Paleobiology 32:387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, S. E., and Foote, M., M. 2001. Biodiveristy in the Phanerozoic: a reinterpretation. Paleobiology 27:583–601.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, S. E., and Foote, M., M.. 2002. Determinants of extinction in the fossil record. Nature 416:420–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pianka, E. R. 1966. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. American Naturalist 100:33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1972. Taxonomic diversity during the Phanerozoic. Science 177:1065–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raup, D. M. 1977. Removing sampling biases from taxonomic diversity data. Journal of Paleontology 51:21–21.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1979. Biases in the fossil record of species and genera. Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of the Natural History 13:85–91.Google Scholar
Ros, S., and Renzi, D. M.. 2005. Preservation biases, rates of evolution and coherence of databases: Bivalvia as a study case. Ameghiniana 42:549–558.Google Scholar
Roy, K., Hunt, G., and Jablonski, D.. 2009. Phylogenetic conservatism of extinctions in marine bivalves. Science 325:733–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10:246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1993. Ten years in the library: new data confirm paleontological patterns. Paleobiology 19:43–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1996. Patterns of Phanerozoic extinction: a perspective from global data bases. Pp. 35–51in O. H. Walliser, ed. Global Events and Event Stratigraphy. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1997. Biodiversity: past, present, and future. Journal of Paleontology 71:533–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1998. Rates of speciation in the fossil record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353:315–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 2002. A compendium of fossil marine animal genera. Bulletin of the American Paleontology 363:1–563.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., and Kendrick, D. C.. 1993. Numerical experiments with model monophyletic and paraphyletic taxa. Paleobiology 19:168–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J., Bambach, R. K., Raup, D. M., and Valentine, J. W.. 1981. Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record. Nature 293:435–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servais, T., Harper, D. A., Munnecke, A., et al. 2009. Understanding the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): Influences of paleogeography, paleoclimate, or paleoecology. GSA Today 19:4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signor, III P. W., and Brett, C. E.. 1984. The mid-Paleozoic precursor to the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology 10:229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. B. 2001. Large-scale heterogeneity of the fossil record: implications for Phanerozoic biodiversity studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 356:351–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. B., and Patterson, C.. 1988. The influence of taxonomy on the perception of patterns of evolution. Evolutionary Biology 23:127–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. B., Gale, A. S., and Monks, N. E. A.. 2001. Sea-level change and rock record bias in the Cretaceous: a problem for extinction and biodiversity studies. Paleobiology 27:241–253.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1968. Post-Paleozoic adaptive radiation of infaunal bivalve molluscs-a consequence of mantle fusion and siphon formation. Journal of Paleontology 42:214–229.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1970. Relation of the shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Memoirs of the Geological Society of America 125:1–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele-Petrovic, H. M. 1979. The physiological differences between articulate brachiopods and filter-feeding bivalves as a factor in the evolution of marine level-bottom communities. Palaeontology 22:101–134.Google Scholar
Steuber, T. 2013. An Introduction to the Paleontology of Rudist Bivalves. http://www.paleotax.de/rudists/intro.htm.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1979. Biological bulldozers and the evolution of marine benthic communities. Science 203:458–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Valen, L. M. 1984. A resetting of Phanerozoic community evolution. Nature 307:50–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, J. W., and Ayala, F. J.. 1978. Adaptive strategies in the sea. Pp. 323–345in J. Beardmore, and B. Bruno, eds. Marine organisms: genetics, ecology, and evolution. Plenum, NY.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., and Jablonski, D.. 1991. Biotic effects of sea level change: the Pleistocene test. Journal of Geophysical Research 96:6873–6878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, J. W., Jablonski, D., Kidwell, S., and Roy, K.. 2006. Assessing the fidelity of the fossil record by using marine bivalves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:6599–6604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic Marine Revolution: evidence from sails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology 3:245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1987. Evolution and Escalation: An Ecological History of Life. Princeton University Press, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Leighton, L. R.. 2003. Does global diversity mean anything? Paleobiology 29:3–7.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1980. Genera of the Bivalvia: A Systematic and Bibliographic Catalog (Revised and Updated). Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Wagner, P. J. 1995. Diversification among early Paleozoic gastropods-contrasting taxonomic and phylogenetic descriptions. Paleobiology 21:410–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, P. J., Aberhan, M., Hendy, A., et al. 2007. The effects of taxonomic standardization on sampling-standardized estimates of historical diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274:439–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, S. E., and Brett, C. E.. 2002. Post-Paleozoic patterns in marine predation: was there a Mesozoic and Cenozoic marine predatory revolution? Paleontological Society Papers 8:119–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webby, B. D., Paris, F., Droser, M. L., and Percival, I. G.. 2004. The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event: Columbia University Press, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar