Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:01:54.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differentiation of generic extinction rates among Upper Ordovician-Devonian articulate brachiopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Richard R. Alexander
Richard R. Alexander*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84321
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The data on the longevity of genera of articulate brachiopods for the Upper Ordovician-Devonian interval (Boucot 1975) are averaged for the taxa of each order. The generic longevity-frequency distributions form three significantly different clusters. The orthids have the highest mean generic longevity value and display a semi-log survivorship profile that is more convex than the other orders. The spiriferid and strophomenid orders have mean generic longevity values higher than and slopes in the survivorship curves less steep than the pentamerids, rhynchonellids and terebratulids. The appreciable differences in the inferred generic extinction rates for the clusters are attributed to the heterogeneity of the ecologies of the orders. The pentamerids had a proportionately higher number of genera concentrated in narrow-niched reefs wherein higher extinction rates depressed the mean generic longevity of this order relative to the orthids, strophomenids and spiriferids. Enhanced longevity of many offshore (non-reef) genera possibly explains the greater mean generic longevity of the orthids, spiriferids and strophomenids relative to the rhynchonellids and terebratulids which included a proportionately higher number of genera concentrated in nearshore habitats. Alternatively, the depressed mean generic longevity values for the rhynchonellids and terebratulids may reflect systematic oversplitting and temporal bias, i.e., origination and initial diversification of order.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , Spring 1979 , pp. 133 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alexander, R. R. 1976. Intraspecific variability in rhynchonellid brachiopods: test of a competition hypothesis. Lethaia. 9:235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1975. Evolution and Extinction Rate Controls. Developments in Palaeontology and Stratigraphy. Vol. 1. 427 pp. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bowen, Z. P., Rhoads, D. C., and McAlester, A. 1974. Marine benthic communities in the Upper Devonian of New York. Lethaia. 7:93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. 1969. Central Appalachian Late Ordovician communities. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 80:193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. 1968. Evolution of Paleozoic marine invertebrate communities. Science. 159:1231–1233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bretsky, P. W. and Lorenz, D. M. 1970. An essay on genetic-adaptive strategies and mass extinctions. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 81:2449–2456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calef, C. E. and Hancock, N. J. 1974. Wenlock and Ludlow marine communities in Wales and the Welsh borderland. Palaeontology. 17:779–810.Google Scholar
Copper, P. 1977. Paleolatitudes in the Devonian of Brazil and the Frasnian-Famennian mass extinction. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 21:165–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copper, P. 1966. Ecological distribution of Devonian atrypid brachiopods. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Paleoecol. 2:245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Keyser, T. L. 1977. Late Devonian (Frasnian) brachiopod community patterns in Western Canada. J. Paleontol. 51:181–196.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. M. 1978. Niche shifts and the rediscovery of interspecific competition. Am. Sci. 66:322–331.Google Scholar
Fursich, F. T. and Hurst, J. M. 1974. Environmental factors determining the distribution of brachiopods. Palaeontology. 17:879–900.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C. 1974. Biogeographic consequences of eurytopy and stenotopy among marine bivalves and their evolutionary significance. Am. Nat. 108:541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. G. 1974. Early Devonian brachiopod biofacies of western and arctic North America. J. Paleontol. 48:809–819.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. G. and Kendall, G. W. 1976. Late Early Devonian brachiopods and biofacies from central Nevada. J. Paleontol. 50:1113–1128.Google Scholar
Levinton, J. S. 1970. The palaeoecological significance of opportunistic species. Lethaia. 3:69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makurath, J. H. 1977. Marine faunal assemblages in the Silurian-Devonian Keyser Limestone of the central Appalachians. Lethaia. 10:235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGhee, G. R. Jr. 1976. Late Devonian benthic marine communities of the central Appalachian Allegheny Front. Lethaia 9:111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. C., ed. 1965. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, pt. H, Brachiopoda. Geol. Soc. Am. and Univ. of Kans. Press; Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1975. Taxonomic survivorship curves and Van Valen's Law. Paleobiology. 1:82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. and Cowen, R. 1968. The functional morphology of some Permian brachiopods from the Sosio Valley, Sicily. Soc. Paleontol. Italy, Bull. 6:113–176.Google Scholar
Ruzhentsev, V. E. and Sarcheva, T. G., eds. 1965. Development and change of marine organisms at the Paleozoic and Mesozoic boundary: Akad. Nauk SSSR, Trudy. Vol. 108:1–431. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102:243–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopf, T. J. M., Raup, D. M., Gould, S. J., and Simberloff, D. S. 1975. Genomic versus morphologic rates of evolution: influence of morphologic complexity. Paleobiology. 1:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1975. Stratigraphic biases in the analysis of taxonomic survivorship. Paleobiology. 1:343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, R. H. 1974. Silurian reefs of northern Indiana: reef and interreef macrofaunas. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., Bull. 58:934–956.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. M. and Lesperance, P. J. 1978. Effect of predation on the population dynamics of a Devonian brachiopod. J. Paleontol. 52:812–817.Google Scholar
Slobodkin, L. B. and Sanders, H. L. 1969. On the contribution of environmental predictability to species diversity. In: Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems. Brockhaven Symp. in Biol. 22:82–93.Google Scholar
Stahle, S. N. 1975. Some comments on Van Valen's Law of extinction. Paleobiology. 1:356–358.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1973. Effects of competition on rates of evolution with special reference to bivalve mollusks and mammals. Syst. Zool. 22:486–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1974. Marine paleoecology in the Upper Devonian of New York. Lethaia. 7:121–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titus, R. and Cameron, B. 1976. Fossil communities of the Lower Trenton Group (Middle Ordovician) of central northwestern New York State. J. Paleontol. 43:905–915.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1974. Temporal bias in extinctions among taxonomic categories. J. Paleontol. 48:549–552.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory. 1:1–30.Google Scholar
Watkins, R. and Boucot, A. J. 1974. Evolution of Silurian brachiopod communities along the southeastern coast of Acadia. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 86:243–254.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. and Hurst, J. 1977. Brachiopod Evolution. Pp. 79–121. In: Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of Evolution as Illustrated by the Fossil Record. Developments in Paleontology and Stratigraphy. Vol. 5. Elsevier; Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, A. M., Cocks, L. R. M., and Bambach, R. K. 1968. The composition and structure of Lower Silurian marine communities. Lethaia. 1:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar