Article contents
The contribution of raptorial birds to patterning in small mammal assemblages
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 April 2016
Abstract
Seven taxa of raptorial birds were experimentally fed a controlled sample of 50 house mice (Mus musculus). Bones recovered from the pellets were examined for interspecies variability in preservation to assess the potential contribution of specific raptors to patterning in fossil assemblages. Quantitative analyses demonstrate that patterns in bone fragmentation may assist in the identification of particular raptor species as depositional agents in small mammal assemblages.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
Literature Cited
Andrews, P. and Evans, E. M. N. 1983. Small mammal bone accumulations produced by mammalian carnivores. Paleobiology 9:289–307.Google Scholar
Chitty, D. 1938. A lab study of pellet formation in the short-eared owl. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, Series A 108:267–287.Google Scholar
Clark, R. J. 1972. Pellets of the short-eared owl and marsh hawk compared. Journal of Wildlife Management 36:962–964.Google Scholar
Cowan, C. W., Jackson, H. E., Moore, K., Nickelhoff, A., and Smart, T. L. 1981. The Cloudsplitter rockshelter, Menifee County, Kentucky: a preliminary report. Southeastern Archeological Conference Bulletin 24:60–76.Google Scholar
Craighead, J. and Craighead, F. 1969. Hawks, Owls, and Wildlife. Dover Press, New York. 443 pp.Google Scholar
Cummings, J. H., Duke, G. E., and Jegers, A. A. 1976. Corrosion of bone by solutions simulating raptor gastric juices. Raptor Research 10:55–57.Google Scholar
Dodson, P. 1973. The significance of small bones in paleoecological interpretations. University of Wyoming Contributions in Geology 12:15–19.Google Scholar
Dodson, P. and Wexlar, D. 1979. Taphonomic investigations of owl pellets. Paleobiology 5:275–284.Google Scholar
Duke, G. E., Jegers, A. A., Leff, G., and Evenson, O. A. 1975. Gastric digestion in some raptors. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 50A:649–656.Google Scholar
Glue, D. E. 1973. Owl pellets. Pp. 185–189. In Burton, J. A. (ed.), Owls of the World. Dutton and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Guilday, J. E. 1962. The Pleistocene local fauna of the Natural Chimneys, Augusta County, Virginia. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 36:87–122.Google Scholar
Guilday, J. E. 1969. The Pleistocene vertebrate fauna of Robinson cave, Overton County, Kentucky. Paleovertebrata 2:25–75.Google Scholar
Guilday, J. E., Martin, P. S., and McCrady, A. D. 1964. New Paris No. 4: a Pleistocene cave deposit in Bedford County, Pennsylvania. Bulletin of the National Speleological Society 26:121–194.Google Scholar
Hall, J. S. and Blewett, C. H. 1964. Bat remains in owl pellets from Missouri. Journal of Mammalogy 45:303–304.Google Scholar
Kintigh, K. W. 1984. Measuring archeological diversity by simulated assemblages. American Antiquity 49:44–54.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W. 1979. Taphonomy of microvertebrate fossil assemblages. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 48:235–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, D. F. 1977. Avian predators as accumulators of fossil mammal material. Boreas 6:25–31.Google Scholar
Reed, C. I. and Reed, B. P. 1928. The mechanism of pellet formation in the great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). Science 68:359–360.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I. and Brett, D. W. 1969. Fossilization processes. Pp. 213–244. In Eglinton, G. and Murphy, M. T. (eds.), Organic Geochemistry: Methods and Results. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Schmid, E. 1969. Cave sediments and prehistory. Pp. 151–166. In Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. (eds.), Science in Archaeology. Thomas and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Sparks, J. and Soper, T. 1970. Owls: Their Natural and Unnatural History. Taplinger, New York. 206 pp.Google Scholar
White, T. E. 1953. A method of calculating the dietary percentage of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity 18:396–398.Google Scholar
- 57
- Cited by