Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:54:32.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary benthic marine assemblages: analyses from the North American coastal plain shallow shelf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Matthew A. Kosnik
Matthew A. Kosnik*
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mesozoic–Cenozoic transition is generally seen as a pivotal time in the evolution of benthic marine assemblages but the details of the timing and drivers of these changes are poorly known. The Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains of the United States contain assemblages preserved as original aragonitic and calcitic material in unconsolidated sediments. This makes coastal plain assemblages ideally suited to paleoecological analyses. Data derived from bulk samples of the Coffee Formation (lower/middle Campanian: Mississippi) as well as published faunal lists from comparable samples of the Severn (Maastrichtian: Maryland), Providence (Maastrichtian: Georgia and Alabama), Stone City (Eocene: Texas), and Gosport (Eocene: Alabama) Formations are used to assess changes in taxonomic diversity and ecomorphological group (life habit and trophic group) composition through this time interval.

These analyses find a significant decrease in rarefied-sample species richness from the Campanian through the Eocene, but no change in evenness. With the notable exception of the Stone City Formation, increases in carnivore (neogastropod) richness and abundance occur before the Campanian. Epifaunal suspension-feeding species are a smaller proportion of the sample richness in Eocene samples than in Cretaceous samples. Decreased relative epifaunal suspension-feeder biomass but unchanged relative numbers of epifaunal suspension-feeder individuals suggests a relative decrease in epifaunal suspension-feeder size. Infaunal suspension feeders increase in richness and abundance through the interval. The proportion of drilled bivalves and gastropods does not change through the interval. Changes found in the structure of local shallow-shelf benthic assemblages from the Campanian through the Eocene are generally small relative to the variability between samples. Formation-level variation between assemblages is high relative to the magnitude of the temporal signal, emphasizing the need for investigators to include multiple formations per interval in tests of temporal trends.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , Summer 2005 , pp. 459 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aberhan, M. 1994. Guild-structure and evolution of Mesozoic benthic shelf communities. Palaios 9:516–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allmon, W. D., Nieh, J. C., and Norris, R. D. 1990. Drilling and peeling of turritelline gastropods since the Late Cretaceous. Palaeontology 33:595–611.Google Scholar
Alroy, J., Marshall, C. R., Bambach, R. K., Bezusko, K., Foote, M., Fürsich, F. T., Hansen, T. A., Holland, S. M., Ivany, L. C., Jablonski, D., Jacobs, D. K., Jones, D. C., Kosnik, M. A., Lidgard, S., Low, S., Miller, A. I., Novack-Gottshall, P. M., Olszewski, T. D., Patzkowsky, M. E., Raup, D. M., Roy, K., Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Sommers, M. G., Wagner, P. J., and Webber, A. 2001. Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:6261–6266.Google Scholar
Ambrose, W. G. 1991. Are infaunal predators important in structuring marine soft-bottom communities? American Zoologist 31:849–860.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1977. Species richness in marine benthic habitats through the Phanerozoic. Paleobiology 3:152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1983. Ecospace utilization and guilds in marine communities through the Phanerozoic. Pp. 719–746in Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L., eds. Biotic interactions in Recent and fossil benthic communities. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1993. Seafood through time: changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology 19:372–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbeau, M. A., Hatcher, B. G., Scheibling, R. E., Hennigar, A. W., Taylor, L. H., and Risk, A. C. 1996. Dynamics of juvenile sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) and their predators in bottom seeding trials in Lunenburg Bay, Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:2494–2512.Google Scholar
Beesley, P. L., Ross, G. J. B., and Wells, A., eds. 1998. Mollusca: the southern synthesis. Fauna of Australia, Vol. 5. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. 1993. The fossil record 2. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Blondel, J. 2003. Guilds or functional groups: does it matter? Oikos 100:223–231.Google Scholar
Buzas, M. A., and Gibson, T. G. 1969. Species diversity: benthonic foraminifera in western North Atlantic. Science 163:72–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CoBabe, E. A., and Allmon, W. D. 1994. Effects of sampling on paleoecologic and taphonomic analyses in high-diversity fossil accumulations: an example from the Eocene GosportSand, Alabama. Lethaia 27:167–178.Google Scholar
Dietl, G. P., Alexander, R. R., and Bien, W. F. 2000. Escalation in Late Cretaceous-early Paleocene oysters (Gryphaeidae) from the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Paleobiology 26:215–237.Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. III. 1993. The Streptoneuran gastropods, exclusive of the Stenoglossa, of the Coffee Sand (Campanian) of Northeastern Mississippi. Mississippi Department of Environmental quality, Office of Geology, Bulletin 129:1–191.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. A. 1988. Early Tertiary radiation of marine molluscs and the long-term effects of the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Paleobiology 14:37–51.Google Scholar
Harper, E. M., Forsythe, G. T. W., and Palmer, T. 1998. Taphonomy and the Mesozoic marine revolution: preservation state masks the importance of boring predators. Palaios 13:352–360.Google Scholar
Ihaka, R., and Gentleman, R. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5:299–314.Google Scholar
Kase, T., and Ishikawa, M. 2003. Mystery of naticid predation history solved: evidence from a “living fossil” species. Geology 31:403–406.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A. 1993. Evolution of the naticid gastropod predator-prey system: an evaluation of the hypothesis of escalation. Palaios 8:358–375.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A. 1996. Naticid gastropod prey selectivity through time and the hypothesis of escalation. Palaios 11:437–445.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., Rothfus, T. A., and Best, M. M. R. 2001. Sensitivity of taphonomic signatures to sample size, sieve size, damage scoring system, and target taxa. Palaios 16:26–52.Google Scholar
Koch, C. F. 1996. Latest Cretaceous mollusc species ‘fabric’ of the US Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain: a baseline for measuring biotic recovery. Pp. 309–317in Hart, M. B., ed. Biotic recovery from mass extinction events. Geological Society of London Special Publication 102:309–317.Google Scholar
Koch, C. F., and Sohl, N. F. 1983. Preservational effects in paleoecological studies: Cretaceous mollusc examples. Paleobiology 9:26–34.Google Scholar
Kosnik, M. A. 2003. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary shallow-shelf benthic marine assemblages. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kosnik, M. A., and Wagner, P. J. 2001 “Richness,” “evenness,” and abundance distribution effects on sample “diversity:” knowing when the data are leading you astray. North American Paleontological Convention 2001, Abstracts.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. 2002. The fossil record of predation: an overview of analytical methods. In Kowalewski, M. and Kelly, P. H., eds. The fossil record of predation. The Paleontological Society Papers 8:3–40.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Dulai, A., and Fürsich, F. T. 1998. A fossil record full of holes: the Phanerozoic history of drilling predation. Geology 26:1091–1094.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M. 1981. The ecology of Mesozoic Gryphaea, Exogyra, and Ilymatogyra (Bivalvia: Mollusca) in a modern ocean. Paleobiology 7:510–526.Google Scholar
Le Renard, J., and Bouchet, P. 2003. New species and genera of the family Pickworthiidae (Mollusca, Caenogastropoda). Zoosystema 25:561–591.Google Scholar
Marincovich, L. Jr. 1977. Cenozoic Naticidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of the northeastern Pacific. Bulletins of American Paleontology 70:165–494.Google Scholar
May, R. M., and Seger, J. 1986. Ideas in ecology. American Scientist 74:256–267.Google Scholar
Moran, M. 2003. Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100:403–405.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. C. 1975. Community structure and evaluation of trophic analysis in paleoecology Stone City Formation (Middle Eocene, Texas). . Texas A&M University, College Station.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1959. Adequacy of the fossil record. Journal of Paleontology 33:488–499.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E., and Foote, M. 2001. Biodiversity in the Phanerozoic: a reinterpretation. Paleobiology 27:583–601.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. H. 1979. Predation, competitive exclusion, and diversity in the soft-sediment benthic communities of estuaries and lagoons. Pp. 233–264in Livingston, R. J., ed. Ecological processes in coastal and marine systems. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Popenoe, W. P., Saul, L. R., and Susuki, T. 1987. Gyrodiform gastropods from the Pacific coast Cretaceous and Paleocene. Journal of Paleontology 61:70–100.Google Scholar
Powell, E. N., and Stanton, R. J. Jr. 1985. Estimating biomass and energy flow of molluscs in palaeo-communities. Palaeontology 28:1–34.Google Scholar
Powell, E. N., Klinck, J. M., Hofmann, E. E., and Ford, S. 1997. Varying the timing of oyster transplant: implications for management from simulation studies. Fisheries Oceanography 6:213–237.Google Scholar
Powell, M. G., and Kowalewski, M. 2002. Increase in evenness and sampled alpha diversity through the Phanerozoic: comparison of early Paleozoic and Cenozoic marine fossil assemblages. Geology 30:331–334.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976a. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: a tabulation. Paleobiology 2:279–288.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976b. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: an interpretation. Paleobiology 2:289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1978. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. I. Analysis of marine orders. Paleobiology 4:223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1981. A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology 7:36–53.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10:246–267.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1988. Alpha, beta, or gamma: where does all the diversity go? Paleobiology 14:221–234.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1997. Biodiversity: past, present, and future. Journal of Paleontology 71:533–539.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Bambach, R. K., Raup, D. M., and Valentine, J. W. 1981. Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record. Nature 293:435–437.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D., and Dayan, T. 1991. The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22:115–143.Google Scholar
Skelton, P. W., Crame, J. A., Morris, N. J., and Harper, E. M. 1990. Adaptive divergence and taxonomic radiation in post-Paleozoic bivalves. Appendix.In Taylor, P. D. and Larwood, G. P., eds. Major evolutionary radiations. Systematics Association Special Volume 42:91–117[Appendix]. Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1987. Cretaceous gastropods: contrasts between Tethys and the temperate provinces. Journal of Paleontology 61:1085–1111.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F., and Koch, C. F. 1983. Upper Cretaceous (Maestrichtian) Mollusca from the Haustator bilira assemblage zone in the east Gulf Coastal Plain. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 83–451:239.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F., and Koch, C. F. 1987. Upper Cretaceous (Maestrichtian) larger invertebrates from the Haustator bilira assemblage zone in the Atlantic Coastal Plain with further data for the east Gulf. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 87–194:172.Google Scholar
Stanton, R. J. Jr., and Zuschin, M. 1999. Effect of microstratigraphy on paleoecologic analysis, Main Glauconite Bed, Stone City Formation, middle Eocene, Texas. Abstracts with Programs—Geological Society of America 31:105.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1977. Trends, rates, and patterns of evolution in the Bivalvia. Pp. 209–250in Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of evolution as illustrated by the fossil record. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Tipper, J. C. 1979. Rarefaction and rarefiction: the use and abuse of a method in paleoecology. Paleobiology 5:423–434.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1969. Patterns of taxonomic and ecological structure of the shelf benthos during Phanerozoic time. Palaeontology 12:684–709.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators, and grazers. Paleobiology 3:245–258.Google Scholar
Wright, P., Cherns, L., and Hodges, P. 2003. Missing molluscs: field testing taphonomic loss in the Mesozoic through early large-scale aragonite dissolution. Geology 31:211–214.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kosnik supplementary material

Appendix

Download Kosnik supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1 MB