Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:19:05.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body-size scaling of metabolic rate in the trilobite Eldredgeops rana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Douglas S. Glazier ,
Matthew G. Powell  and
Travis J. Deptola
Douglas S. Glazier
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania 16652, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]
Matthew G. Powell
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania 16652, U.S.A.
Travis J. Deptola
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We infer the body-size scaling slope of metabolic rate in a trilobite by applying a cell-size model that has been proposed to explain metabolic scaling in living organisms. This application is especially tractable in fossil arthropods with well-preserved compound eyes because the number and size of eye facets appear to be useful proxies for the relative number and size of cells in the body. As a case study, we examined the ontogenetic scaling of facet size and number in a ∼390-Myr-old local assemblage of the trilobite Eldredgeops rana, which has well-preserved compound eyes and a wide body-size range. Growth in total eye lens area resulted from increases in both facet area and number in relatively small (presumably young) specimens, but only from increases in facet area in large (presumably more mature) specimens. These results suggest that early growth in E. rana involved both cell multiplication and enlargement, whereas later growth involved only cell enlargement. If the cell-size model is correct, then metabolic rate scaled allometrically in E. rana, and the scaling slope of log metabolic rate versus log body mass decreased from ∼0.85 to 0.63 as these animals grew. This inferred age-specific change in metabolic scaling is consistent with similar changes frequently observed in living animals. Additional preliminary analyses of literature data on other trilobites also suggest that the metabolic scaling slope was <1 in benthic species, but ∼1 in pelagic species, as has also been observed in living invertebrates. The eye-facet size (EFS) method featured here opens up new possibilities for examining the bioenergetic allometry of extinct arthropods.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , Winter 2013 , pp. 109 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Agutter, P. S., and Tuszynski, J. A. 2011. Analytic theories of allometric scaling. Journal of Experimental Biology 214:1055–1062.Google Scholar
Arendt, J. D. 2000. Allocation of cells to proliferation vs. differentiation and its consequences for growth and development. Journal of Experimental Zoology B 288:219–23.Google Scholar
Banavar, J. R., Maritan, A., and Rinaldo, A. 1999. Size and form in efficient transportation networks. Nature 399:130–132.Google Scholar
Banavar, J. R., Moses, M. E., Brown, J. H., Damuth, J., Rinaldo, A., Sibly, R. M., and Maritan, A. 2010. A general basis for quarter-power scaling in animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:15816–15820.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Baird, G. C. 1994. Depositional sequences, cycles, and foreland basin dynamics in the late Middle Devonian (Givetian) of the Genesee Valley and western Finger Lakes region. InBrett, C. E. and Scatterday, J., eds. Field trip guidebook. New York State Geological Association Guidebook 66:505–585.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., Bartholomew, A. J., and Baird, G. C. 2007. Biofacies recurrence in the Middle Devonian of New York State: an example with implications for evolutionary paleoecology. Palaios 22:306–324.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M., and West, G. B. 2004. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chown, S. L., Marais, E., Terblanche, J. S., Klok, C. J., Lighton, J. R. B., and Blackburn, T. M. 2007. Scaling of insect metabolic rate is inconsistent with the nutrient supply network model. Functional Ecology 21:282–290.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1889. The structure and development of the visual area in the trilobite, Phacops rana, Green. Journal of Morphology 2:253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. 1966. Schizochroal eyes and vision of some Silurian acastid trilobites. Palaeontology 9:1–29.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. 1973. Morphology and evolution of the eye in Upper Cambrian Olenidae (Trilobita). Palaeontology 16:735–763.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. 1979. The visual system of trilobites. Palaeontology 22:1–22.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K., and Ahlberg, P. 2002. Ontogeny and structure of a new, miniaturized and spiny olenid trilobite from southern Sweden. Palaeontology 45:1–22.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E., Levi-Setti, R., and Horváth, G. 2006. The eyes of trilobites: the oldest preserved visual system. Arthropod Structure and Development 35:247–259.Google Scholar
Czarnołeski, M., Kozłowski, J., Dumiot, G., Bonnet, J.-C., Mallard, J., and Dupont-Nivet, M. 2008. Scaling of metabolism in Helix aspersa snails: changes during ontogeny and response to selection for increased size. Journal of Experimental Biology 211:391–400.Google Scholar
Davison, J. 1955. Body weight, cell surface and metabolic rate in anuran Amphibia. Biological Bulletin 109:407–419.Google Scholar
Davison, J. 1956. An analysis of cell growth and metabolism in the crayfish (Procambarus alleni). Biological Bulletin 110:264–273.Google Scholar
Dexter, T. A., Sumrall, C. D., and McKinney, M. L. 2009. Allometric strategies for increasing respiratory surface area in the Mississippian blastoid Pentremites. Lethaia 42:127–137.Google Scholar
Finnegan, S., McClain, C. M., Kosnik, M. A., and Payne, J. L. 2011. Escargots through time: an energetic comparison of marine gastropod assemblages before and after the Mesozoic Marine Revolution. Paleobiology 37:252–269.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 2004. The lifestyles of trilobites. American Scientist 92:446–453.Google Scholar
Glazier, D. S. 2005. Beyond the ‘3/4-power law': variation in the intra- and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals. Biological Reviews 80:611–662.Google Scholar
Glazier, D. S. 2006. The 3/4-power law is not universal: evolution of isometric, ontogenetic metabolic scaling in pelagic animals. BioScience 56:325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazier, D. S. 2008. Effects of metabolic level on the body-size scaling of metabolic rate in birds and mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 275:1405–1410.Google Scholar
Glazier, D. S. 2010. A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants. Biological Reviews 84:111–138.Google Scholar
Glazier, D. S., Butler, E. M., Lombardi, S. A., Deptola, T. J., Reese, A. J., and Satterthwaite, E. V. 2011. Ecological effects on metabolic scaling: amphipod responses to fish predators in freshwater springs. Ecological Monographs 81:599–618.Google Scholar
Gregory, T. R. 2002. A bird's eye view of the C-value enigma: genome size, cell size, and metabolic rate in the class Aves. Evolution 56:121–130.Google Scholar
Hemmingsen, A. M. 1960. Energy metabolism as related to body size and respiratory surfaces, and its evolution. Reports of the Steno Memorial Hospital and Nordisk Insulin Laboratorium 9:1–110.Google Scholar
Kerkhoff, A. J., and Enquist, B. J. 2009. Multiplicative by nature: why logarithmic transformation is necessary in allometry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 257:519–521.Google Scholar
Kirby, M. X. 2001. Differences in growth rate and environment between Tertiary and Quaternary Crassostrea oysters. Paleobiology 27:84–103.Google Scholar
Kirby, M. X., and Jackson, J. B. C. 2004. Extinction of a fast-growing oyster and changing ocean circulation in Pliocene tropical America. Geology 32:1025–1028.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. 1932. Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia 6:315–353.Google Scholar
Knoll, A.H., Bambach, R. K., Canfield, D. E., and Grotzinger, J. P. 1996. Comparative Earth history and Late Permian mass extinction. Science 273:452–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoll, A.H., Bambach, R. K., Payne, J. L., Pruss, S., and Fischer, W. W. 2007. Paleophysiology and end-Permian mass extinction. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 256:295–313.Google Scholar
Kozłowski, J., Konarzewski, M., and Gawelczyk, A. T. 2003. Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:14080–14085.Google Scholar
Kozłowski, J., Czarnoleski, M., François-Krassowska, A., Maciak, S., and Pis, T. 2010. Cell size is positively correlated between different tissues in passerine birds and amphibians, but not necessarily in mammals. Biology Letters 6:792–796.Google Scholar
Land, M. F. 1997. Visual acuity in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 42:147–177.Google Scholar
Lee, M. S. Y., Jago, J. B., García-Bellido, D. C., Edgecombe, G. D., Gehling, J. G., and Paterson, J. R. 2011. Modern optics in exceptionally preserved eyes of Early Cambrian arthropods from Australia. Nature 474:631–634.Google Scholar
Maciak, S., Janko, K., Kotusz, J., Choleva, L., Boroń, A., Juchno, D., Kujawa, R., Kozłowski, J., and Konarzewski, M. 2011. Standard metabolic rate (SMR) is inversely related to erythrocyte and genome size in allopolyploid fish of the Cobitis taenia hybrid complex. Functional Ecology 25:1072–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makarieva, A. M., Gorshkov, V. G., Li, B.-L., Chown, S. L., Reich, P. B., and Gavrilov, V. M. 2008. Mean mass-specific metabolic rates are strikingly similar across life's major domains: evidence for life's metabolic optimum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105:16994–16999.Google Scholar
Martin, A.P., and Palumbi, S. R. 1993. Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 90:4087–4091.Google Scholar
McCormick, T., and Fortey, R. A. 1998. Independent testing of a paleobiological hypothesis: the optical design of two Ordovician pelagic trilobites reveals their paleobathymetry. Paleobiology 24:235–253.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L., and Sumrall, C. D. 2011. Ambulacral growth allometry in edrioasteroids: functional surface-volume change in ontogeny and phylogeny. Lethaia 44:102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, K. J. 1978. Paedomorphosis in Scottish Olenellid trilobites (Early Cambrian). Palaeontology 21:635–655.Google Scholar
Miller, K. B. 1991. High-resolution correlation within a storm-dominated muddy epeiric sea: taphofacies of the Middle Devonian Wanakah Member, western New York. InLanding, E. and Brett, C. E., eds. Dynamic stratigraphy and depositional environments of the Hamilton Group (Middle Devonian) in New York State, Part II. New York State Museum Bulletin 469:129–153.Google Scholar
Miller, K. B., Brett, C. E., and Parsons, K. M. 1988. The paleoecologic significance of storm-generated disturbance within a Middle Devonian muddy epeiric sea. Palaios 3:35–52.Google Scholar
Oakley, T. H. 2003. On homology of arthropod compound eyes. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43:522–530.Google Scholar
Pérez-Claros, J. A. 2005. Allometric and fractal exponents indicate a connection between metabolism and complex septa in ammonites. Paleobiology 31:221–232.Google Scholar
Peters, R. H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pis, T. 2008. Resting metabolic rate and erythrocyte morphology in early development of thermoregulation in the precocial grey partridge (Perdix perdix). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 151:211–218.Google Scholar
Reich, P. B., Tjoelker, M. G., Machado, J.-L., and Oleksyn, J. 2006. Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants. Nature 439:457–461.Google Scholar
Rigby, S. and Milsom, C. V. 2000. Origins, evolution, and diversification of zooplankton. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:293–313.Google Scholar
Riisgård, H. U. 1998. No foundation of a ‘3/4 power scaling law' for respiration in biology. Ecology Letters 1:71–73.Google Scholar
Riveros, A. J., and Enquist, B. J. 2011. Metabolic scaling in insects supports the WBE model. Journal of Insect Physiology 57:688–693.Google Scholar
Savage, V. M., Gillooly, J. F., Woodruff, W. H., West, G. B., Allen, A. P., Enquist, B. J., and Brown, J. H. 2004. The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology. Functional Ecology 18:257–282.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1984. Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schoenemann, B., Clarkson, E. N. K., Ahlberg, P., and Álvarez, M. E. D. 2010. A tiny eye indicating a planktonic trilobite. Palaeontology 53:695–701.Google Scholar
Seymour, R. S., Smith, S. L., White, C. R., Henderson, D. M., and Schwarz-Wings, D. 2012. Blood flow to long bones indicates activity metabolism in mammals, reptiles, and dinosaurs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 279:451–456.Google Scholar
Starostová, Z., Kubička, L., Konarzewski, M., Kozłowski, J., and Kratochvíl, L. 2009. Cell size but not genome size affects scaling of metabolic rate in eyelid geckos. American Naturalist 174:E100–E105. doi:10.1086/603610.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. D., Hill, M. G., and Bryant, P. J. 1995. Organ and cell allometry in Hawaiian Drosophila: how to make a big fly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 259:105–110.Google Scholar
Struve, W. 1990. Paläozoologie III: 1986–1990. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 127:251–279.Google Scholar
Szarski, H. 1983. Cell size and the concept of wasteful and frugal evolutionary strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 105:201–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, A. T. 2005. Developmental palaeobiology of trilobite eyes and its evolutionary significance. Earth-Science Reviews 71:77–93.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1995. Economics, volcanoes, and Phanerozoic revolutions. Paleobiology 21:125–152Google Scholar
Vijendravarma, R. K., Narasimha, S., and Kawecki, T. J. 2011. Plastic and evolutionary responses of cell size and number to larval malnutrition in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24:897–903.Google Scholar
Wehner, R. 1981. Spatial vision in arthropods. Pp. 287–616inAutrum, H., ed. Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. VII/6C. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
West, G. B., Brown, J. H., and Enquist, B. J. 1997. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276:122–126.Google Scholar
White, C. R., Cassey, P., and Blackburn, T. M. 2007. Allometric exponents do not support a universal metabolic allometry. Ecology 88:315–323.Google Scholar
Whiteley, T. E., Kloc, G. J., and Brett, C. E. 2002. Trilobites of New York. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1957. The ontogeny of trilobites. Biological Reviews 32:421–469.Google Scholar
Wurster, C. M., and Patterson, W. P. 2003. Metabolic rate of late Holocene freshwater fish: evidence from δ13C values of otoliths. Paleobiology 29:492–505.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., and Clarkson, E. N. K. 1990. The eyes of Lower Cambrian Eodiscid trilobites. Palaeontology 33:911–932.Google Scholar