Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:49:25.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ark was full! Constant to declining Cenozoic shallow marine biodiversity on an isolated midlatitude continent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

James S. Crampton ,
Alan G. Beu ,
Roger A. Cooper ,
Craig M. Jones ,
Iain Matcham ,
Michael Foote ,
Bruce A. Marshall  and
Phillip A. Maxwell
James S. Crampton
Affiliation:
GNS Science, Post Office Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]
Alan G. Beu
Affiliation:
GNS Science, Post Office Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]
Roger A. Cooper
Affiliation:
GNS Science, Post Office Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]
Craig M. Jones
Affiliation:
GNS Science, Post Office Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]
Iain Matcham
Affiliation:
GNS Science, Post Office Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]
Michael Foote
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Bruce A. Marshall
Affiliation:
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Post Office Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand
Phillip A. Maxwell
Affiliation:
257 Otipua Road, Highfield, Timaru, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years several authors have questioned the reality of a widely accepted and apparently large increase in marine biodiversity through the Cenozoic. Here we use collection-level occurrence data from the rich and uniquely well documented New Zealand (NZ) shelfal marine mollusc fauna to test this question at a regional scale. Because the NZ data were generated by a small number of workers and have been databased over many decades, we have been able to either avoid or quantify many of the biases inherent in analyses of past biodiversity. In particular, our major conclusions are robust to several potential taphonomic and systematic biases and methodological uncertainties, namely non-uniform loss of aragonitic faunas, biostratigraphic range errors, taxonomic errors, choice of time bins, choice of analytical protocols, and taxonomic rank of analysis.

The number of taxa sampled increases through the Cenozoic. Once diversity estimates are standardized for sampling biases, however, we see no evidence for an increase in marine mollusc diversity in the NZ region through the middle and late Cenozoic. Instead, diversity has been approximately constant for much of the past 40 Myr and, at the species and genus levels, has declined over the past ~5 Myr. Assuming that the result for NZ shelfal molluscs is representative of other taxonomic groups and other temperate faunal provinces, then this suggests that the postulated global increase in diversity is either an artifact of sampling bias or analytical methods, resulted from increasing provinciality, or was driven by large increases in diversity in tropical regions. We see no evidence for a species-area effect on diversity. Likewise, we are unable to demonstrate a relationship between marine temperature and diversity, although this question should be re-examined once refined shallow marine temperature estimates become available.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , Fall 2006 , pp. 509 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adrain, J. M., and Westrop, S. R. 2000. An empirical assessment of taxic paleobiology. Science 289:110–112.Google Scholar
Allen, A. P., Brown, J. H., and Gillooly, J. F. 2002. Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule. Science 297:1545–1548.Google Scholar
Alroy, J. 1996. Constant extinction, constrained diversification, and uncoordinated stasis in North American mammals. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 127:285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alroy, J. 1998. Diachrony of mammalian appearance events: implications for biochronology. Geology 26:23–26.Google Scholar
Alroy, J. 2000. New methods for quantifying macroevolutionary patterns and processes. Paleobiology 26:707–733.Google Scholar
Alroy, J., Marshall, C. R., Bambach, R. K., Bezusko, K., Foote, M., Fürsich, F. T., Hansen, T. A., Holland, S. M., Ivany, L. C., Jablonski, D., Jacobs, D. K., Jones, D. C., Kosnik, M. A., Lidgard, S., Low, S., Miller, A. I., Novack-Gottshall, P. M., Olszewski, T. D., Patzkowsky, M. E., Raup, D. M., Roy, K., Sepkoski, J. J. J., Sommers, M. G., Wagner, P. J., and Webber, A. 2001. Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:6261–6266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ausich, W. I., and Peters, S. E. 2005. A revised macroevolutionary history for Ordovician–Early Silurian crinoids. Paleobiology 31:538–551.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1977. Species richness in marine benthic habitats through the Phanerozoic. Paleobiology 3:152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1999. Energetics in the global marine fauna: a connection between terrestrial diversification and change in the marine biosphere. Geobios 32:131–144.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K., Fürsich, F. T., Gastaldo, R. A., Kidwell, S. M., Kosnik, M. A., Kowalewski, M., Plotnick, R. E., Rogers, R. R., and Alroy, J. 2005. Are the most durable shelly taxa also the most common in the marine fossil record? Paleobiology 31:607–623.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G. 1983. New Zealand Neogene molluscan biostratigraphy. Fifteenth Congress of the Pacific Science Association. Programme, abstracts and congress information, Vol. 1. University of Otago, Dunedin. [Unpaginated.] Google Scholar
Beu, A. G. 1990. Molluscan generic diversity of New Zealand Neogene stages: extinction and biostratigraphic events. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 77:279–288.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G., and Maxwell, P. A. 1990. Cenozoic Mollusca of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Palaeontological Bulletin 58:1–518.Google Scholar
Bush, A. M., and Bambach, R. K. 2004. Did alpha diversity increase during the Phanerozoic? Lifting the veils of taphonomic, latitudinal, and environmental biases. Journal of Geology 112:625–642.Google Scholar
Bush, A. M., Markey, M. J., and Marshall, C. R. 2004. Removing bias from diversity curves: the effects of spatially organized biodiversity on sampling-standardization. Paleobiology 30:666–686.Google Scholar
Carter, R. M., McCave, I. N., and Carter, L. 2004. Leg 181 synthesis: fronts, flows, drifts, volcanoes, and the evolution of the southwestern gateway to the Pacific Ocean, eastern New Zealand. Pp. 1–112 in Richter, C., ed. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Vol. 181. Scientific Results; Southwest Pacific gateways. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Tex. Google Scholar
Cherns, L., and Wright, V. P. 2000. Missing molluscs as evidence of large-scale, early skeletal aragonite dissolution in a Silurian sea. Geology 28:791–794.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. A., ed. 2004. The New Zealand geological timescale. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Monograph 22:1–284.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. A., Maxwell, P. A., Crampton, J. S., Beu, A. G., Jones, C. M., and Marshall, B. A. 2006. Completeness of the fossil record: estimating losses due to small body size. Geology 34:241–244.Google Scholar
Crame, J. A. 2001. Taxonomic diversity gradients through geological time. Diversity and Distributions 7:175–189.Google Scholar
Crame, J. A., and Rosen, B. R. 2002. Cenozoic palaeogeography and the rise of modern biodiversity patterns. In Crame, J. A. and Owen, A. W., eds. Palaeobiogeography and biodiversity change: the Ordovician and Mesozoic-Cenozoic radiations. Geological Society of London Special Publication 194:153–168.Google Scholar
Crampton, J. S., Beu, A. G., Cooper, R. A., Jones, C. M., Marshall, B., and Maxwell, P. A. 2003. Estimating the rock volume bias in paleobiodiversity studies. Science 301:358–360.Google Scholar
Crampton, J. S., Foote, M., Beu, A. G., Cooper, R. A., Matcham, I., Jones, C. M., Maxwell, P. A., and Marshall, B. 2006. Second-order sequence stratigraphic controls on the quality of the fossil record at an active margin: New Zealand Eocene to Recent shelf molluscs. Palaios 21:86–105.Google Scholar
Finnegan, S., and Droser, M. L. 2005. Relative and absolute abundance of trilobites and rhynchonelliform brachiopods across the Lower/Middle Ordovician boundary, eastern Basin and Range. Paleobiology 31:480–502.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2000. Origination and extinction components of taxonomic diversity: general problems. In Erwin, D. H. and Wing, S. L., eds. Deep time: Paleobiology's perspective. Paleobiology Paleobiology 26(Suppl. to No. 4):74–102.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2003. Origination and extinction through the Phanerozoic: a new approach. Journal of Geology 111:125–148.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2005. Pulsed origination and extinction in the marine realm. Paleobiology 31:6–20.Google Scholar
Forey, P. L., Fortey, R. A., Kenrick, P., and Smith, A. B. 2004. Taxonomy and fossils: a critical appraisal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359:639–653.Google Scholar
Hendy, A. J. W. 2005. Lithification and the measurement of biodiversity—is missing alpha stuck between a rock and a hard place? Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 37(7):117.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, H. 2004. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. American Naturalist 163:192–211.Google Scholar
Hornibrook, N. de B. 1992. New Zealand Cenozoic marine paleoclimates: a review based on the distribution of some shallow water and terrestrial biota. Pp. 83–106 in Tsuchi, R. and Ingle, J. C. J., eds. Pacific Neogene: environment, evolution, and events. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., Roy, K., and Valentine, J. W. 2000. Analysing the latitudinal diversity gradient in marine bivalves. In Harper, E. M., Taylor, J. D., and Crame, J. A., eds. Evolutionary biology of the Bivalvia. of the Geological Society of London Special Publication 177:361–365.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., Roy, K., Valentine, J. W., Price, R. M., and Anderson, P. S. 2003. The impact of the Pull of the Recent on the history of marine diversity. Science 300:1133–1135.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., and Johnson, K. G. 2001. Measuring past biodiversity. Science 293:2401–2404.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., Todd, J. A., Fortunato, H., and Jung, P. 1999. Diversity and assemblages of Neogene Caribbean Mollusca of lower Central America. Bulletins of American Paleontology 357:193–213.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. 2005. Shell composition has no net impact on large-scale evolutionary patterns in mollusks. Science 307:914–917.Google Scholar
King, P. R. 2000. New Zealand's changing configuration in the last 100 million years: plate tectonics, basin development, and depositional setting. Pp. 131–145 in 2000 New Zealand Petroleum Conference Proceedings, 19–22 March 2000, Christchurch Convention Centre, New Zealand. Ministry of Economic Development, Wellington.Google Scholar
King, P. R., Naish, T. R., Browne, G. H., Field, B. D., and Edbrooke, S. W. 1999. Cretaceous to Recent sedimentary patterns in New Zealand. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Folio Series 1:1–35.Google Scholar
Kosnik, M. A. 2005. Changes in Late Cretaceous–early Tertiary benthic marine assemblages: analyses from the North American coastal plain shallow shelf. Paleobiology 31:459–479.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Kiessling, W., Aberhan, M., Fürsich, F. T., Scarponi, D., Barbour Wood, S. L., and Hoffmeister, A. P. 2006. Ecological, taxonomic, and taphonomic components of the post-Paleozoic increase in sample-level species diversity of marine benthos. Paleobiology 32 [this issue].Google Scholar
Maas, M. C., Anthony, M. R. L., Gingerich, P. D., Gunnell, G. F., and Krause, D. W. 1995. Mammalian generic diversity and turnover in the Late Paleocene and Early Eocene of the Bighorn and Crazy Mountains Basins, Wyoming and Montana (USA). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 115:181–207.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H., and Wilson, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar
Martin, R. E. 2003. The fossil record of biodiversity: nutrients, productivity, habitat area and differential preservation. Lethaia 36:179–194.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1990. Classifying and analysing evolutionary trends. Pp. 28–58 in McNamara, K. J., ed. Evolutionary trends. Belhaven, London.Google Scholar
McRoberts, C. A., and Aberhan, M. 1997. Marine diversity and sea-level changes: numerical tests for association using Early Jurassic bivalves. Geologische Rundschau 86:160–167.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I., and Foote, M. 1996. Calibrating the Ordovician Radiation of marine life: implications for Phanerozoic diversity trends. Paleobiology 22:304–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, C., and Smith, A. B. 1989. Periodicity in extinction: the role of systematics. Ecology 70:802–811.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E. 2004. Evenness of Cambrian-Ordovician benthic marine communities in North America. Paleobiology 30:325–346.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E. 2005. Geologic constraints on the macroevolutionary history of marine animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:12326–12331.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E., and Foote, M. 2001. Biodiversity in the Phanerozoic: a reinterpretation. Paleobiology 27:583–601.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. G., and Kowalewski, M. 2002. Increase in evenness and sampled alpha diversity through the Phanerozoic: comparison of early Paleozoic and Cenozoic marine fossil assemblages. Geology 30:331–334.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2004. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1975. Taxonomic diversity estimation using rarefaction. Paleobiology 1:333–342.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: an interpretation. Paleobiology 2:289–297.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1979. Biases in the fossil record of species and genera. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 13:85–91.Google Scholar
Robeck, H. E., Maley, C. C., and Donoghue, M. J. 2000. Taxonomy and temporal diversity patterns. Paleobiology 26:171–187.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1998. Preston's ergodic conjecture: the accumulation of species in space and time. Pp. 311–348 in McKinney, M. L. and Drake, J. A., eds. Biodiversity dynamics: turnover of populations, taxa, and communities. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Roy, K., Jablonski, D., and Valentine, J. W. 1996. Higher taxa in biodiversity studies: patterns from eastern Pacific marine molluscs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351:1605–1613.Google Scholar
Roy, K., Jablonski, D., Valentine, J. W., and Rosenberg, G. 1998. Marine latitudinal diversity gradients: tests of causal hypotheses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:3699–3702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schopf, T. J. M., Fisher, J. B., and Smith, C. A. F. I. 1978. Is the marine latitudinal diversity gradient merely another example of the species-area curve? Pp. 365–386 in Battaglia, B. and Beardmore, J. A., eds. Marine organisms: genetics, ecology, and evolution. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Scotland, R. W., and Sanderson, M. J. 2004. The significance of few versus many in the tree of life. Science 303:643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1993. Ten years in the library: new data confirm paleontological patterns. Paleobiology 19:43–51.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr 1994. Limits to randomness in paleobiologic models: the case of Phanerozoic species diversity. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 38:175–198.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1997. Biodiversity: past, present, and future. Journal of Paleontology 71:533–539.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 2002. A compendium of fossil marine animal genera. Bulletins of American Paleontology 363:1–560.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., and Hulver, M. L. 1985. An atlas of Phanerozoic clade diversity diagrams. Pp. 11–39 in Valentine, 1985b.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., and Kendrick, D. C. 1993. Numerical experiments with model monophyletic and paraphyletic taxa. Paleobiology 19:168–184.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Bambach, R. K., Raup, D. M., and Valentine, J. W. 1981. Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record. Nature 293:435–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signor, P. W. I. 1985. Real and apparent trends in species richness through time. Pp. 129–150 in Valentine, 1985b.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W. I. 1990. The geologic history of diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:509–539.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 2001. Large-scale heterogeneity of the fossil record: implications for Phanerozoic biodiversity studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 356:351–367.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B., and Patterson, C. 1988. The influence of taxonomic method on the perception of patterns of evolution. Evolutionary Biology 23:127–216.Google Scholar
Smith, E. P., Stewart, P. M., and Cairns, J. J. 1985. Similarities between rarefaction methods. Hydrobiologia 120:167–170.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. G., Marshall, B. A., Maxwell, P. A., Grant-Mackie, J. A., Stilwell, J. D., Willan, R. C., Campbell, H. J., Crampton, J. S., Henderson, R. A., Bradshaw, M. A., Waterhouse, J. B., and Pojeta, J. Jr. In press. Phylum Mollusca: chitons, clams, tusk shells, snails, squids, and kin. Chapter 10 in Gordon, D., ed. The New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity; Vol. 1. Kingdom Animalia: Radiata, Lophotrochozoa, and Deuterostomia. Canterbury University Press, Christchurch.Google Scholar
Sutherland, R., King, P., and Wood, R. 2001. Tectonic evolution of Cretaceous rift basins in south-eastern Australia and New Zealand: implications for exploration risk assessment. Pp. 3–13 in Hill, K. C. and Bernecker, T., eds. Proceedings of the PESA Eastern Australasian Basins Symposium, 25–28 November 2001, Melbourne, Victoria. Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia Special Publication. Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Carlton, Victoria.Google Scholar
Tipper, J. C. 1979. Rarefaction and rarefiction—the use and abuse of a method in paleoecology. Paleobiology 5:423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
Turner, J. R. G., Lennon, J. J., and Greenwood, J. J. D. 1996. Does climate cause the global diversity gradient? Pp. 199–220 in Hochberg, M. E., Clobert, J., and Barbault, R., eds. Aspects of the genesis and maintenance of biological diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1985a. Diversity as data. Pp. 3–8 in Valentine, 1985b.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., ed. 1985b. Phanerozoic diversity patterns; profiles in macroevolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., and Jablonski, D. 1991. Biotic effects of sea level change: the Pleistocene test. Journal of Geophysical Research 96:6873–6878.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 2005. From phenomenology to first principles: toward a theory of diversity. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 56:12–23.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Leighton, L. R. 2003. Does global diversity mean anything? Paleobiology 29:3–7.Google Scholar
Wright, P., Cherns, L., and Hodges, P. 2003. Missing molluscs: field testing taphonomic loss in the Mesozoic through early large-scale aragonite dissolution. Geology 31:211–214.Google Scholar
Zachos, J. C., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E., and Billups, K. 2001. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292:686–693.Google Scholar