Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:40:34.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sublethal injury and shell repair in Upper Mississippian ammonoids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Paul N. Bond  and
W. Bruce Saunders
Paul N. Bond
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010
W. Bruce Saunders
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sublethal injuries recorded in the shells of five Upper Mississippian ammonoid species from the Imo Formation of northwest Arkansas are manifested as repaired shell breaks, which can be categorized as minor, moderate, massive, deep-acute, or as perforations. Overall, 15% of the ammonoids exhibit some form of repaired break. The injuries are distributed as follows: Anthracoceras discus 9%; Fayettevillea bransoni 13%; Fayettevillea friscoense 21%; Rhadinites miseri 24%; Richardsonites mapesi 38%. These figures are substantially lower than in living Nautilus, in which more than one-half of adult specimens exhibit repaired shell breaks. The different frequencies of injuries may reflect species-selective predation, differential abilities to sustain and to repair shell damage, or they may be due to interspecific differences in physical parameters such as shell thickness and body chamber length. The most likely possible perpetrators of the injuries include sharks, other fishes, and cephalopods.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , Fall 1989 , pp. 414 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alexander, R. R. 1981. Predation scars preserved in Chesterian brachiopods: probable culprits and evolutionary consequences for the articulates. Journal of Paleontology 55:192–203.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 1986. Resistance to and repair of shell breakage induced by durophages in Late Ordovician brachiopods. Journal of Paleontology 60:273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J. M. 1985. Shell growth, trauma, and repair as an indicator of life history for Nautilus. Veliger 27:386–396.Google Scholar
Bengston, S. 1968. Borings in Mobergella from the Lower Cambrian of the Baltic. Lethaia 1:325–351.Google Scholar
Bond, P. N., and Bukowski, F.In press. A mosasaur predation on Sphenodiscus. The Mosasaur 4.Google Scholar
Burdick, D. W., and Strimple, H. L. 1973. New Late Mississippian crinoids from northern Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology 47:231–243.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1981. Hydromechanical design of fossil cephalopods. Pp. 289–336. In House, M. R., and Senior, J. R. (eds.), The Ammonoidea. Systematic Association Special Volume 18. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar
Copeland, M. J. 1967. A new species of Dithyocaris (Phyllocarida) from the Imo Formation, Upper Mississippian of Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology 41:1195–1196.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. First Edition (1966 facsimile). Harvard University Press; Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dudley, E. C., and Dudley, E. C. 1980. Drilling predation on some Miocene marine molluscs. Nautilus 94:63–66.Google Scholar
Elliott, D. K., and Bounds, S. D. 1987. Causes of damage to brachiopods from the Middle Pennsylvania Naco Formation, Central Arizona. Lethaia 20:327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnish, W. M., Quinn, J. H., and McCaleb, J. A. 1964. The Upper Mississippian ammonoid Delepinoceras in North America. Palaeontology 7:173–180.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. Jr. 1965. Carboniferous cephalopods of Arkansas. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guex, J. 1967. Contribution à l'étude les blessures chez les ammonites. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 69:323–338.Google Scholar
Guex, J. 1968. Sur deux consequences particulières des traumatismes du manteau des ammonites. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelle 70:121–126.Google Scholar
Haven, N. 1972. The ecology and behavior of Nautilus pompilius in the Philippines. Veliger 15:75–81.Google Scholar
Hölder, H. 1970. Anomalien an molluskenschalen insbesondere Ammoniten. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 44:185–192.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G., and Kesling, R. V. 1960. An Upper Cretaceous ammonite bitten by a mosasaur. University of Michigan Contributions, Museum of Paleontology 15:193–248.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H. 1988. Predation by Miocene gastropods of the Chesapeake Bay Group; stereotyped and predictable. Palaios 4:436–448.Google Scholar
Landman, N. H., and Waage, K. M. 1986. Shell abnormalities in scaphitid ammonites. Lethaia 19:211–224.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R. 1977. Rapid repair of a traumatic injury by an Ordovician trilobite. Lethaia 10:205–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLulich, D. A. 1936. Fluctuations in the numbers of the varying hare (Lepus americanus). Science 83:162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamet, B. L. 1982. A report on algal microfacies at the Mississippian–Pennsylvanian boundary, North America. Pp. 52–60. In Ramsbottom, W. H. C., Saunders, W. B., and Owens, B. (eds.), Biostratigraphic Data for a Mid-Carboniferous Boundary. Sub-commission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy; Leeds.Google Scholar
Mapes, R. H. 1979. Carboniferous and Permian Bactritoidea (Cephalopoda) in North America. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Article 64.Google Scholar
Mapes, R. H., and Hansen, M. C. 1984. Pennsylvanian shark-cephalopod predation: a case study. Lethaia 17:175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapes, R. H., Faher, T. R., and Babcock, L. E. 1989. Sublethal and lethal injuries of Pennsylvanian conulariids from Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology 63:34–37.Google Scholar
McCaleb, J. A., Quinn, J. H., and Furnish, W. M. 1964. Girtyoceratidae in the southern Midcontinent. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 67.Google Scholar
Mech, L. D. 1966. Hunting behaviour of timber-wolves in Minnesota. Journal of Mammalogy 47:347–348.Google Scholar
Meenakshi, V. R., Martin, A. W., and Wilbur, K. M. 1974. Shell repair in Nautilus macromphalus. Marine Biology 27:27–35.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., and Macurda, D. B. Jr. 1977. Adaptive radiation of the comatulid crinoids. Paleobiology 3:74–82.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., and Miles, R. S. 1971. Paleozoic Fishes. W. B. Saunders Company; Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Müller, A. H. 1970. Weitere aberrationen bei Ceratiten. Monatsberichte der deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin 12:219–231.Google Scholar
Pocock, K. T. 1974. A unique case of teratology in trilobite segmentation. Lethaia 7:63–66.Google Scholar
Rohr, D. M. 1976. Silurian predation borings in brachiopods from the Canadian Arctic. Journal of Paleontology 50:1175–1179.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B. 1973. Upper Mississippian ammonoids from Arkansas and Oklahoma. Geological Society of America Special Paper 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, W. B. 1975. The Upper Mississippian Eumorphoceras richardsoni-Cravenoceras friscoense ammonoid assemblage, North American Midcontinent. Septième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géolgie du Carbonifère 4:201–207.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B., and Shapiro, E. A. 1986. Calculation and simulation of ammonoid hydrostatics. Paleobiology 12:64–79.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B., and Swan, A. R. H. 1984. Morphology and morphologic diversity of mid-Carboniferous (Namurian) ammonoids in time and space. Paleobiology 10:195–228.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B., Spinosa, C., and Davis, L. A. 1987. Predation on Nautilus. Pp. 201–212. In Saunders, W. B., and Landman, N. H. (eds.), Nautilus: The Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil. Plenum Press; New York and London.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1979. Inferring the properties of predation and other injury-producing agents from injury frequencies. Ecology 60:1110–1115.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W., and Brett, C. E. 1984. The mid-Paleozoic precursor to the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology 2:229–245.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Thayer, C. W., and Brett, C. E. 1985. Predation in the Paleozoic:gastropod-like drillholes in Devonian brachiopods. Science 230:1033–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, S. M. 1968. Post Paleozoic adaptive radiation of infaunal bivalue molluscs. Journal of Paleontology 42:214–219.Google Scholar
Sullivan, H. J., and Mischell, D. R. 1971. The Mississippian–Pennsylvanian boundary and its correlation with Europe. Compte Rendu, VI Congrès International de Stratigraphe et de Géologie du Carbonifère 4:1533–1540.Google Scholar
Sutherland, P. K., and Manger, W. L., (eds.) 1977. Mississippian–Pennsylvanian Boundary in northeastern Oklahoma and northwestern Arkansas. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 18.Google Scholar
Swan, A. R. H., and Saunders, W. B. 1987. Function and shape in Late Paleozoic (mid-Carboniferous) ammonoids. Paleobiology 13:297–311.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. N., and Eggert, D. A. 1967. Petrified plants from the Upper Mississippian (Chesterian Series) of Arkansas. American Microscopical Society Transactions 84:412–416.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. D., Cleevely, R. J., and Norris, N. J. 1983. Predatory gastropods and their activities in the Blackdown Greensand (Albian) of England. Palaeontology 26:521–553.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. D. K. 1976. Gastropod predation on sympatric Neogene species of Glycymeris (Bivalvia) from the eastern United States. Journal of Paleontology 50:488–499.Google Scholar
Trueman, A. E. 1941. The ammonite body chamber with special reference to the buoyancy and mode of life of the living ammonoid. Geological Society of London Quarterly Journal 96:339–383.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology 3:245–258.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Biogeography and Adaption Patterns of Marine Life. Harvard University Press; Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1983. Traces and trends of predation with special reference to bivalve animals. Journal of Paleontology 26:455–465.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., Schindel, D. E., and Zipser, E. 1981. Predation through geological time: evidence from gastropod shell repair. Science 214:1024–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed