Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:50:57.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Respiration in a vagrant Ordovician cystoid, Amecystis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Thomas W. Broadhead  and
Harrell L. Strimple
Thomas W. Broadhead
Affiliation:
Dept. Geology, Univ. Iowa; Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Harrell L. Strimple
Affiliation:
Dept. Geology, Univ. Iowa; Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Amecystis Ulrich and Kirk is a rhombless rhombiferan cystoid exhibiting adaptation to an active mode of life in the bilaterally symmetrical, dorso-ventrally compressed theca and to an active mode of respiration suggested by the lack of pore rhombs and greatly enlarged periproct. Like other members of the Pleurocystitidae, Amecystis probably wriggled along the bottom, but may have adopted a temporarily sessile habit by pushing the distal stele into the substrate or by grasping. Evolution of the genus began in the Middle Ordovician, probably as a development from Pleurocystites. General trends in the stratigraphic succession of recognized morphospecies: A. raymondi Parsley, A. woodi n.sp., and A. laevis (Raymond) show a reduction in angularity of thecal outline and obsolescence of surface features on the thecal plates. The use of the periproct as a pumping organ in respiration is regarded as an advanced trend that was probably utilized by many rhomb-bearing cystoids as an accessory respiratory mode; alone, it proved to be an unsuccessful adaptation in Amecystis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , Summer 1975 , pp. 312 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bell, B. M. 1973. Respiratory schemes in the Class Edrioasteroidea [Abstr.]. Geol. Soc. Am., Abstr. with Programs. 5:544–545.Google Scholar
Broadhead, T. W. 1974. Reevaluation of the morphology of Amecystis laevis (Raymond). J. Paleontol. 48:670–673.Google Scholar
Dehm, R. 1934. Untersuchungen an Cystoideen de rheinischen, Unterdevons. Acad. Wiss. 3. Munchen, Abt. 1934. pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. H. 1955. The Invertebrates, 4: Echinodermata. 763 pp. McGraw-Hill; New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. O. 1967. Cystoids. In: Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, pt. S (Echinodermata) 1:S85–S267.Google Scholar
Parsley, R. L. 1970. Revision of the North American Pleurocystitidae (Rhombifera-Cystoidea). Bull. Am. Paleontol. 58(260):135–213.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1967. The functional morphology and mode of life of the cystoid Pleurocystites, E. Billings, 1854. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 20:105–123.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1968a. Macrocystella Callaway, the earliest glyptocystitid cystoid. Palaeontology. 11:580–600.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1968b. Morphology and function of dichoporite pore-structures in cystoids. Palaeontology. 11:679–730.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1921. A contribution to the description of the fauna of the Trenton Group. Can. Dept. Mines, Mus. Bull. 31:1–64.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A., and Sprinkle, J. 1969. Ctenocystoidea: new class of primitive echinoderms. Science. 166:1512–1514.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1973. Morphology and evolution of blastozoan echinoderms. Mus. Comp. Zool., Spec. Publ. 284 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1974. New rhombiferan cystoids from the Middle Ordovician of Nevada. J. Paleontol. 48:1174–1201.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Kirk, E. 1921. Amecystis, a new genus of Ordovician cystidea. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 34:147–148.Google Scholar