Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:58:22.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantifying paleogeography using biogeography: a test case for the Ordovician and Silurian of Avalonia based on brachiopods and trilobites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

David C. Lees ,
Richard A. Fortey  and
L. Robin M. Cocks
David C. Lees
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]
Richard A. Fortey
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]
L. Robin M. Cocks
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite substantial advances in plate tectonic modeling in the last three decades, the postulated position of terranes in the Paleozoic has seldom been validated by faunal data. Fewer studies still have attempted a quantitative approach to distance based on explicit data sets. As a test case, we examine the position of Avalonia in the Ordovician (Arenig, Llanvirn, early Caradoc, and Ashgill) to mid-Silurian (Wenlock) with respect to Laurentia, Baltica, and West Gondwana. Using synoptic lists of 623 trilobite genera and 622 brachiopod genera for these four plates, summarized as Venn diagrams, we have devised proportional indices of mean endemism (ME, normalized by individual plate faunas to eliminate area biogeographic effects) and complementarity (C) for objective paleobiogeographic comparisons. These can discriminate the relative position of Avalonia by assessing the optimal arrangement of inter-centroid distances (measured as great circles) between relevant pairs of continental masses. The proportional indices are used to estimate the “goodness-of-fit” of the faunal data to two widely used dynamic plate tectonic models for these time slices, those of Smith and Rush (1998) and Ross and Scotese (1997). Our faunal data are more consistent with the latter model, which we use to suggest relationships between faunal indices for the five time slices and new rescaled inter-centroid distances between all six plate pairs. We have examined linear and exponential models in relation to continental separation for these indices. For our generic data, the linear model fits distinctly better overall. The fits of indices generated by using independent trilobite and brachiopod lists are mostly similar to each other at each time slice and for a given plate, reflecting a common biogeographic signal; however, the indices vary across the time slices. Combining groups into the same matrix in a “total evidence” analysis performs better still as a measure of distance for mean endemism in the “Scotese” plate model. Four-plate mean endemism performs much better than complementarity as an indicator of pairwise distance for either plate model in the test case.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , Summer 2002 , pp. 343 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adrain, J. M., Fortey, R. A., and Westrop, S. R. 1998. Post-Cambrian trilobite diversity and evolutionary faunas. Science 280:1922–1925.Google Scholar
Astini, R. A. 1999. Sedimentary record, volcano-tectonic cyclicity and progressive emergence of an early Ordovician Peri-gondwanan volcanic arc: Famatina System. Acta Universitatas Carolinae-Geologica 43:115–118.Google Scholar
Burrett, C. 1973. Ordovician biogeography and continental drift. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 13:161–201.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. A., and Valentine, J. W. 1977. Comparability of modern and ancient marine faunal provinces. Paleobiology 3:49–57.Google Scholar
Christiansen, J. L., and Stouge, S. 1999. Oceanic circulation as an element in palaeogeographical reconstructions: the Arenig (early Ordovician) as an example. Terra Nova 11:73–78.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M., and Fortey, R. A. 1982. Faunal evidence for oceanic separations in the Palaeozoic of Britain. Journal of the Geological Society, London 139:465–478.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M., and Fortey, R. A. 1988. Lower Palaeozoic facies and faunas around Gondwana. In M. G. Audley-Charles and A. Hallam, eds. Gondwana and Tethys. Geological Society of London Special Publication 37:183–200.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M., and Fortey, R. A. 1998. The Lower Palaeozoic margins of Baltica. Geologiska Föreningens Förhandlinger 120:173–179Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M., McKerrow, W. S., and Van Staal, C. R. 1997. The margins of Avalonia. Geological Magazine 134:627–636.Google Scholar
Colwell, R. K., and Coddington, J. A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 345:101–118.Google Scholar
Ebach, M. C., and Edgecombe, G. D. 2001. Cladistic biogeography: component-based methods and paleontological application. Pp. 235–289in Adrain, J. M., Edgecombe, G. D., and Lieberman, B. S., eds. Fossils, phylogeny, and form: an analytical approach. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Cocks, L. R. M. 1992. The early Palaeozoic of the North Atlantic region as a test case for the use of fossils in continental reconstruction. Tectonophysics 206:147–158.Google Scholar
Harper, D. A. T., MacNiocaill, C., and Williams, S. H. 1996. The palaeogeography of early Ordovician Iapetus terranes: an integration of faunal and palaeomagnetic constraints. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 121:297–312.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1997. A new look at age and area: the geographic and environmental expansion of genera during the Ordovician Radiation. Paleobiology 23:410–419.Google Scholar
Mound, J. E., and Mitrovica, J. X. 1998. True polar wander as a mechanism for second-order sea-level variations. Science 279:534–537.Google Scholar
Nekola, J. C., and White, P. S. 1999. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography 26:867–878.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A., and Etheridge, R. 1878. A monograph of the Silurian fossils of the Girvan District in Ayrshire. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Picoli, G., Sartori, S., Franchino, A., Pedron, R., Claudio, L., and Natale, A. R. 1991. Mathematical model of faunal spreading in benthic palaeobiogeography (applied to Cenozoic Tethyan molluscs). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 86:139–196.Google Scholar
Ross, M. I., and Scotese, C. R. 1997. PaleoGIS™ for ArcView: extension for ArcView 3.1 and manual. Earth in Motion Technologies, Paleomap Foundation, Houston, Tex.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R., and McKerrow, W. S. 1990. Revised world maps and introduction. Geological Society of London Memoir 12:1–21.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. M., and Coorough, P. J. 1990. Brachiopod zoogeography across the Ordovician-Silurian extinction event. Geological Society of London Memoir 12:181–187.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., and Rush, L. E. 1998. AtlasWinPro, Version 1.12. Program and manuals. Cambridge Paleomap Services, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., Briden, J. C., and Drewry, G. E. 1973. Phanerozoic world maps. Special Papers in Palaeontology 12:1–42.Google Scholar
Spjeldnaes, N. 1961. Ordovician climatic zones. Norsk Geologisk Tiddskrift 41:45–77.Google Scholar
Torsvik, T. H., Ryan, P. D., Trench, A., and Harper, D. A. T. 1991. Cambrian–Ordovician paleogeography of Baltica. Geology 19:7–10.Google Scholar
Trench, A., Torsvik, T. H., and McKerrow, W. S. 1992. The palaeogeographic evolution of Southern Britain during early Paleozoic times: a reconciliation of palaeomagnetic and biogeographic evidence. Tectonophysics 201:75–82.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., Foin, T. C., and Peart, D. 1978. A provincial model of Phanerozoic marine diversity. Paleobiology 4:55–66.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1966. Phylogeny and distribution of Ordovician trilobites. Journal of Paleontology 40:696–737.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B., and Hughes, C. P. 1972. Ordovician geography and faunal provinces deduced from trilobite distribution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 263:235–278.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B., and Hughes, C. P. 1973. Ordovician trilobite distribution and geography. Special Papers in Palaeontology 12:235–240.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 1969. Ordovician faunal provinces with reference to brachiopod distribution. Pp. 117–154in Wood, A., ed. The Pre-Cambrian and Lower Palaeozoic rocks of Wales. University of Wales Press, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Brunton, C. H. C., and Carlson, S. J. 2000. Brachiopoda (revised). Part H, Vols. 2, 3 ofKaesler, R. L., ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo, and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Willis, J. C. 1922. Age and area: a study in geographical distribution and origin in species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar