Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T09:14:05.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Man Bites Botanical Dogma - Palaeobiology of Angiosperm Origins.Norman F. Hughes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1976. vii + 242 pp. $21.50.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

James A. Doyle
James A. Doyle*
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , Summer 1976 , pp. 265 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bakker, R. T. 1975. Dinosaur renaissance. Sci. Am. 232:58–78.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. A. and Hickey, L. J. 1976. Pollen and leaves from the mid-Cretaceous Potomac Group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution. pp. 139–206. In: Beck, C. B., ed. Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. A., Van Campo, M. and Lugardon, B. 1975. Observations on exine structure of Eucommiidites and Lower Cretaceous angiosperm pollen. Pollen et Spores 17:429–486.Google Scholar
Ehrendorfer, F. 1976. Evolutionary significance of chromosomal differentiation patterns in gymnosperms and primitive angiosperms. pp. 220–240. In: Beck, C. B., ed. Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
MacKay, M. R. 1970. Lepidoptera in Cretaceous amber. Science 167:379–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodendorf, B. B., and Zherikhin, V. V. 1974. Paleontologiya i okhrana prirody. Priroda. 1974(5):82–91.Google Scholar
Savin, S. M., Douglas, R. G. and Stehli, F. G. 1975. Tertiary marine paleotemperatures. Geol. Soc. of Am. Bull. 86:1499–1510.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, B., Hecht, M. K. and Eldredge, N. 1972. Phylogeny and paleontology. pp. 31–46. In: Dobzhansky, T., Hecht, M. K. and Steere, W. C., eds. Evolutionary Biology. Vol. 6.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level. 399 pp. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockey, R. A. 1975. Seeds and embryos of Araucaria mirabilis. Am. J. of Bot. 62:856–868.Google Scholar
Takhtajan, A. L. 1959. Die Evolution der Angiospermen. 344 pp. Gustav Fischer Verlag; Jena.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. A. 1971. Tertiary climatic fluctuations and methods of analysis of Tertiary floras. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 9:27–57.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. A., Doyle, J. A. and Page, V. M. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Paleobotany. Ann. of the Missouri Bot. Gard. 62:801–824.Google Scholar