Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:35:27.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-resolution estimates of temporal mixing within shell beds: the evils and virtues of time-averaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Michał Kowalewski ,
Glenn A. Goodfriend  and
Karl W. Flessa
Michał Kowalewski
Affiliation:
Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818, Warszawa, Poland. E-mail: [email protected]
Glenn A. Goodfriend
Affiliation:
Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road N.W., Washington, D.C. 20015
Karl W. Flessa
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study quantifies the fine structure of time-averaging by using large samples of dated shells collected from within individual strata. Time-averaging results in both good and bad news for interpreting bioclastic deposits.

Nine samples of shells were collected from four Holocene cheniers on the Colorado Delta (Gulf of California) and 165 shells of the bivalve Chione fluctifraga were dated using 14C-calibrated amino acid racemization (D-alloisoleucine/L-isoleucine). The age range of shells within samples averages 661 years and, in seven out of nine samples, exceeds 500 years. The sample standard deviation ranges from 73 to 294 years and averages 203 years, far exceeding the dating errors (≪100 years) and potential variation in the life span of Chione (<10 years). Time-averaging is homogeneous among strata within cheniers but varies significantly among cheniers. Age-distributions of dated shells indicate that at 50-year resolution, the samples provide a continuous and uniform record for the entire interval. The actual sample completeness (63.6%) is very close to that predicted by simulations of sampling a 100% complete, uniform record (67.3%).

The bad news is that, no matter how carefully collected, data from shell beds may not be suitable for studying processes on timescales shorter than 102 to 103 years; explanations for faunal change that invoke reasoning or models derived from a strictly ecological point of view may rarely be justifiable. Also, notable differences in temporal resolution between the shell beds of seemingly identical origin imply that paleontological patterns (e.g., species diversity) may be affected by cryptic variation in time-averaging. The comparison of our data with time-averaging estimates obtained from other cheniers at coarser sampling resolutions indicates that pooling of samples (analytical time-averaging) can significantly reduce the temporal resolution of paleontological data.

The good news is that shell beds can record the optimal type of time-averaging: where paleobiological data are a time-weighted average of the faunal composition from the spectrum of environments that existed during the entire interval of time. Samples from single strata provide a long-term record that is representative of the predominating environments. Within the range of 14C dating, shell beds can provide a complete, high-resolution record, and thus may offer exceptional insights into the environmental and climatic changes of the last 40 thousand years.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , Summer 1998 , pp. 287 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allmon, W. D. 1989. Paleontological completeness of the record of lower Tertiary mollusks, U.S. Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plains: implications for phylogenetic studies. Historical Biology 3: 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, L. C., Gupta, B. K., and Byrnes, M. R. 1997. Reduced seasonality of Holocene climate and pervasive mixing of Holocene marine section: northeastern Gulf of Mexico shelf. Geology 25: 127–130.Google Scholar
Augustinus, P. G. E. F. 1989. Cheniers and chenier plains: a general introduction. Marine Geology 90: 219–229.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1982. Time resolution in fluvial vertebrate assemblages. Paleobiology 8: 211–227.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K. and Hook, R. W. 1992. Paleoenvironmental contexts and taphonomic modes. Pp. 15–136. Behrensmeyer, A. K., Damuth, J. D., DiMichele, W. A., Potts, R., Sues, H. D., Wing, S. L.Terrestrial ecosystems through time. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Boyajian, G. E. and Thayer, C. W. 1995. Clam calamity: a recent supratidal storm-deposit as an analog for fossil shell beds. Palaios 10: 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. S. 1989. The taphonomy of gastropod shell accumulations in large lakes: an example from Lake Tanganyika, Africa. Paleobiology 15: 26–44.Google Scholar
Cummins, H., Powell, E. N., Stanton, R. J. Jr., and Staff, G. 1986. The rate of taphonomic loss in modern benthic habitats: how much of the potentially preservable community is preserved. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 89: 193–204.Google Scholar
Diaconis, P. and Efron, B. 1983. Computer-intensive methods in statistics. Scientific American 248: 116–130.Google Scholar
DiCiccio, T. J. and Romano, J. P. 1988. A review of bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B (Methodological) 50: 338–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. 1981. Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals. Canadian Journal of Statistics 9: 139–172.Google Scholar
Flessa, K. W. and Kowalewski, M. 1994. Shell survival and time-averaging in nearshore and shelf environments: estimates from the radiocarbon literature. Lethaia 27: 153–165.Google Scholar
Flessa, K. W., Cutler, A. H., and Meldahl, K. H. 1993. Time and taphonomy: quantitative estimates of time-averaging and stratigraphic disorder in a shallow marine habitat. Paleobiology 19: 266–286.Google Scholar
Flessa, K. W., Dettman, D. L., Surge, D. M., Goodfriend, G. A., Zachos, J. C., and Tellez-Duarte, M. A. 1997. Long-term record of river flow from isotopic variation in subfossil marine mollusks: the case of the Colorado River. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program 29: A66.Google Scholar
Fradkin, P. L. 1984. A river no more. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T. and Aberhan, M. 1990. Significance of time-averaging for palaeocommunity analysis. Lethaia 23: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfriend, G. A. 1987. Chronostratigraphic studies of sediments in the Negav Desert, using amino acid epimerization analysis of land snails. Quaternary Research 28: 374–392.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, G. A. 1989. Complementary use of amino acid epimerization and radiocarbon analysis for dating mixed-age fossil assemblages. Radiocarbon 31: 1041–1047.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, G. A. and Flessa, K. W. 1997. Radiocarbon reservoir ages in the Gulf of California: role of upwelling and flow from the Colorado River. Radiocarbon 39: 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfriend, G. A. and Gould, S. J. 1996. Paleontology and chronology of an evolutionary transition by hybridization in the Bahamian land snail Cerion. Science 274: 1894–1897.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, G. A. and Mitterer, R. M. 1993. A 45,000-yr record of tropical lowland biota: the land snail fauna from cave sediments at Coco Ree, Jamaica. Geological Society of America Bulletin 105: 18–29.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, G. A., Flessa, K. W., and Kowalewski, M. 1995. Age distribution of bivalve shells in cheniers and the late Holocene environmental history of the Colorado Delta. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program 27: A373.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, G. A., Flessa, K. W., and Hare, P. E. 1997. Variation in amino acid epimerization rates and amino acid composition among shell layers in the bivalve Chione from the Gulf of California. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 61: 1487–1493.Google Scholar
Hall, P. 1992. Efficient bootstrap simulations. Pp. 127–143. in Lepage, R., Billard, L. L. eds. Exploring the limits of bootstrap Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Hoyt, J. H. 1969. Chenier versus barrier, genetic and stratigraphic distinction. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 53: 299–306.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1993. Taphonomic approaches to time resolution in fossil assemblages. Short Courses in Paleontology 6 Paleontological Society, Knoxville, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. and Brenchley, P. J. 1994. Patterns in bioclastic accumulations through the Phanerozoic: changes in input or in destruction? Geology 22: 1139–1143.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. and Brenchley, P. J. 1996. Evolution of the fossil record: thickness trends in marine skeletal accumulations and their implications. Pp. 290–336. in Jablonski, D., Erwin, D. H., Lipps, J. H. eds. Evolutionary paleobiology University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. and Bosence, D. W. J. 1991. Taphonomy and time-averaging of marine shelly faunas. In Allison, P. A., Briggs, D. E. G. eds. Taphonomy: releasing data locked in the fossil record. Topics in Geobiology 9: 115–209. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. and Flessa, K. W. 1995. The quality of the fossil record: populations, species, and communities. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 26: 269–299.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. 1996a. Time-averaging, overcompleteness, and the geological record. Journal of Geology 104: 317–326.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. 1996b. Taphonomy of a living fossil: the lingulide brachiopod Glottidia palmeri Dall from Baja California, Mexico. Palaios 11: 244–265.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. 1997. The reciprocal taphonomic model. Lethaia 30: 86–88.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Flessa, K. W., and Aggen, J. A. 1994. Taphofacies analysis of Recent shelly cheniers (beach ridges), northeastern Baja California, Mexico. Facies 31: 209–242.Google Scholar
Manly, B. F. J. 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Martin, R. J., Wehmiller, J. F., Harris, M. S., and Liddel, W. D. 1996. Comparative taphonomy of bivalves and foraminifera from Holocene tidal flat sediments, Bahia la Choya, Sonora, Mexico (northern Gulf of California): taphonomic grades and temporal resolution. Paleobiology 22: 80–90.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. K. 1991. Completeness of the fossil record: an overview. Pp. 66–83. in Donovan, S. K. ed. The processes of fossilization Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Meldahl, K. H. 1995. Pleistocene shoreline ridges from tide-dominated and wave-dominated coasts: northern Gulf of California and western Baja California, Mexico. Marine Geology 123: 61–72.Google Scholar
Meldahl, K. H., Flessa, K. W., and Cutler, A. H. 1997. Time-averaging and postmortem skeletal survival in benthic fossil assemblages: quantitative comparisons among Holocene environments. Paleobiology 23: 207–229.Google Scholar
Olszewski, T. 1997. Accounting bias due to time-averaging in fossil data: when is enough enough? Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program. 29: A311.Google Scholar
Otvos, E. G. and Price, W. A. 1979. Problems of chenier genesis and terminology—an overview. Marine Geology 3: 251–263.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. H. 1977. The paleontological significance of undetected short-term temporal variability. Journal of Paleontology 51: 976–981.Google Scholar
Powell, E. N. and Davis, D. J. 1990. When is an “old” shell really old? Journal of Geology. 98: 823–844.Google Scholar
Sadler, P. M. 1981. Sediment accumulation rates and the completeness of stratigraphic sections. Journal of Geology 89: 569–584.Google Scholar
Staff, G. M., Stanton, R. J. Jr., Powell, E. N., and Cummins, H. 1986. Time-averaging, taphonomy, and their impact on paleocommunity reconstruction: death assemblages in Texas bays. Geological Society of America Bulletin 97: 428–443.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. W. 1968. Tidal flat sedimentation on the Colorado River delta, northwestern Gulf of California. Geological Society of America Memoir 107: 1–133.Google Scholar
Walker, K. R. and Bambach, R. K. 1971. The significance of fossil assemblages from fine-grained sediments: time-averaged communities. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program 3: 783–784.Google Scholar
Wehmiller, J. F., York, L. L., and Bart, M. L. 1995. Amino-acid racemization geochronology of reworked Quaternary mollusks on U.S. Atlantic coast beaches: implications for chronostratigraphy, taphonomy, and coastal sediment transport. Marine Geology 124: 303–337.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. V. H. 1988. Taphonomic processes: information loss and information gain. Geoscience Canada 15: 131–148.Google Scholar