Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:17:10.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genus extinction, origination, and the durations of sedimentary hiatuses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Shanan E. Peters
Shanan E. Peters*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences and Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Short-term variations in rates of taxonomic extinction and origination in the fossil record may be the result of true changes in rates of turnover, variable rates of fossil preservation, or some combination of the two. Here, positive extinction and origination rate excursions among Phanerozoic marine animal genera are reexpressed in terms of the amount of normal, background time they represent. In addition to providing a background-adjusted calibration of rate intensities, this reexpression determines the durations of sampling gaps that would be required to explain entirely all observed rate excursions as sampling artifacts. This possibility is explored by analyzing a new compilation of the timing and duration of sedimentary hiatuses in North America.

Hiatuses spanning more than approximately one million years (Myr) in the marine sedimentary rock record have a mean duration of 73 Myr. There are two major hiatus types—those that form in response to long-duration tectonic cycles and that bound the major Sloss-scale sequences (mean duration 200 Myr), and those that form in response to shorter-duration changes in sediment accommodation space and that occur within major Sloss-scale sequences (mean duration less than 23 Myr). The latter are approximately exponentially distributed and have a mean duration that is comparable to the mean duration of intervening sedimentary rock packages.

Although sedimentary hiatuses are generally long enough in duration to accommodate the hypothesis that short-term variations in rates of genus origination and extinction are artifacts of sampling failures at major unconformities (“Unconformity Bias” hypothesis), the observed evolutionary rates are not correlated with hiatus durations. Moreover, hiatuses that follow the major mass extinctions are not long in comparison to most other non-mass extinction intervals. These results do not support the hypothesis that hiatuses at major unconformities alone have artificially clustered genus first and last occurrences, thereby causing many of the documented statistical similarities between the temporal structure of the sedimentary rock record and macroevolutionary patterns. Instead, environmental changes related to the expansion and contraction of marine environments may have been the primary forcers of both biological turnover and the spatio-temporal pattern of sediment accumulation. Fully testing this “Common Cause” hypothesis requires quantifying and overcoming lingering taxonomic, biostratigraphic, facies, and numerous other biases that are both inherent in geologic data and imposed by imperfect knowledge of the fossil record.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , Summer 2006 , pp. 387 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adrain, J. M., and Westrop, S. R. 2000. An empirical assessment of taxic paleobiology. Science 289:110–112.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Peters, S. E. 2005. A revised macroevolutionary history for Ordovician-Early Silurian crinoids. Paleobiology 31:538–551.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K., Knoll, A. H., and Wang, S. C. 2004. Origination, extinction, and mass depletions of marine diversity. Paleobiology 30:522–542.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. 2003. The quality of the fossil record. Pp. 66–90in Donoghue, P. C. J. and Smith, M. P., eds. Telling the evolutionary time: molecular clocks and the fossil record. CRC Press, London.Google Scholar
Childs, O. E. 1985. Correlation of stratigraphic units of North America; COSUNA. AAPG Bulletin 69:173–180.Google Scholar
Crampton, S. C., Beu, A. G., Cooper, R. A., Jones, C. M., Marshall, B., and Maxwell, P. A. 2003. Estimating the rock volume bias in paleobiodiversity studies. Science 301:358–360.Google Scholar
Culver, S. J., Buzas, M. A., and Collins, L. S. 1987. On the value of taxonomic standardization in evolutionary studies. Paleobiology 13:169–176.Google Scholar
Droser, M. L., Fortey, R. A., and Li, X. 1996. The Ordovician radiation. American Scientist 84:122–131.Google Scholar
Droser, M. L., Bottjer, D. J., and Sheehan, P. M. 1997. Evaluating the ecological architecture of major events in the Phanerozoic history of marine invertebrate life. Geology 25:167–170.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H., Bowring, S. A., and Jin, Y. 2002. End-Permian mass extinctions: a review. Geological Society of America Special Paper 356:363–383.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2000a. Origination and extinction components of taxonomic diversity: general problems. In Erwin, D. H. and Wing, S. L., eds. Deep time: Paleobiology's perspective. Paleobiology 26(Suppl. to No. 4):74–102.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2000b. Origination and extinction components of taxonomic diversity: Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic dynamics. Paleobiology 26:578–605.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2003. Origination and extinction through the Phanerozoic: a new approach. Journal of Geology 111:125–148.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2005. Pulsed origination and extinction in the marine realm. Paleobiology 31:6–20.Google Scholar
Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Smith, A. G., Agterberg, F. P., Bleeker, W., Cooper, R. A., Davydov, V., Gibbard, P., Hinnov, I. A., House, M. R., Lourens, I., Luterbacher, H. P., McArthur, J., Melchin, M. J., Robb, I. J., Shergold, J., Villeneuve, M., Wardlaw, B. R., Ali, J., Brinkhuis, H., Hilgen, F. J., Hooker, J., Howarth, R. J., Knoll, A. H., Laskar, J., Monechi, S., Powell, J., and Plumb, K. A. 2004. A geologic time scale 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1989. The case for sea-level changes as a dominant causal factor in mass extinctions of marine invertebrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 325:437–455.Google Scholar
Hallam, A., and Wignall, P. B. 1999. Mass extinctions and sea-level changes. Earth Science Reviews 48:217–250.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1995. The stratigraphic distribution of fossils. Paleobiology 21:92–109.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1996. Recognizing artifactually generated coordinated stasis; implications of numerical models and strategies for field tests. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 127:147–156.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 2000. The quality of the fossil record: a sequence stratigraphic perspective. Paleobiology 26:148–168.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 2002. Stratigraphic variation in the timing of first and last occurrences. Palaios 17:134–146.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 2005. Mass extinctions and macroevolution. Paleobiology 31:192–210.Google Scholar
Jeffery, C. H. 2001. Heart urchins at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary: a tale of two clades. Paleobiology 27:140–158.Google Scholar
Kirchner, J. W. 2002. Evolutionary speed limits inferred from the fossil record. Nature 415:65–68.Google Scholar
Kirchner, J. W., and Weil, A. 2000. Delayed biological recovery from extinctions throughout the fossil record. Nature 404:177–180.Google Scholar
Miller, K. G., Kominz, M. A., Browning, J. V., Wright, J. D., Mountain, G. S., Katz, M. E., Sugarman, P. J., Cramer, B. S., Christie-Blick, N., and Pekar, S. F. 2005. The Phanerozoic record of global sea-level change. Nature 310:1293–1298.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1949. Periodicity in invertebrate evolution. Geological Society of America Bulletin 60:1911–1912.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1952. Periodicity in invertebrate paleontology. Journal of Paleontology 26:371–385.Google Scholar
Patterson, C., and Smith, A. B. 1989. Periodicity in extinction; the role of systematics. Ecology 70:802–811.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E. 2005. Geologic constraints on the macroevolutionary history of marine animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:12326–12331.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E. 2006. Macrostratigraphy of North America. Journal of Geology 114:391–412.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E., and Foote, M. 2001. Biodiversity in the Phanerozoic: a reinterpretation. Paleobiology 27:583–601.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E., and Foote, M. 2002. Determinants of extinction in the fossil record. Nature 416:420–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raup, D. M. 1972. Taxonomic diversity during the Phanerozoic. Science 177:1065–1071.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: an interpretation. Paleobiology 2:289–297.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1978. Cohort analysis of generic survivorship. Paleobiology 4:1–15.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1979. Size of the Permo-Triassic bottleneck and its evolutionary implications. Science 206:217–218.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science 215:1501–1503.Google Scholar
Ronov, A. B. 1978. The Earth's sedimentary shell. International Geology Review 24:1313–1363.Google Scholar
Ronov, A. B., Khain, V. E., Balukhovsky, A. N., and Seslavinsky, K. B. 1980. Quantitative analysis of Phanerozoic sedimentation. Sedimentary Geology 25:311–325.Google Scholar
Salvador, A. 1985. Chronostratigraphic and geochronometric scales in COSUNA stratigraphic correlation charts of the United States. AAPG Bulletin 69:181–189.Google Scholar
Schopf, T. J. M. 1974. Permo-Triassic extinctions: relation to sea-floor spreading. Journal of Geology 82:129–143.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1976. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: species-area effects. Paleobiology 2:298–303.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. A kinetic-model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity 3: post-paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10:246–267.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1993. 10 years in the library: new data confirm paleontological patterns. Paleobiology 19:43–51.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 2002. A compendium of fossil marine animal genera. Bulletins of American Paleontology 363:560.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Bambach, R. K., Raup, D. M., and Valentine, J. W. 1981. Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record. Nature 293:435–437.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W., and Lipps, J. H. 1982. Sampling bias, gradual extinction patterns and catastrophes in the fossil record. Geological Society of America Special Paper 190:291–296.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. S. 1974. Permo-Triassic extinctions: effects of area on biotic equilibrium. Journal of Geology 82:267–274.Google Scholar
Sloss, L. L. 1963. Sequences in the cratonic interior of North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin 74:93–113.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 2001. Large-scale heterogeneity of the fossil record: implications for Phanerozoic biodiversity studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 356:351–367.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B., and Jeffery, C. H. 1998. Selectivity of extinction among sea urchins at the end of the Cretaceous period. Nature 392:69–71.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B., Gale, A. S., and Monks, N. E. A. 2001. Sea-level change and rock-record bias in the Cretaceous: a problem for extinction and biodiversity studies. Paleobiology 27:241–253.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., and Moores, E. M. 1970. Plate-tectonic regulation of faunal diversity and sea level: a model. Nature 228:657–659.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. M. 1984. A resetting of Phanerozoic community evolution. Nature 307:50–52.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. M. 1985. How constant is extinction? Evolutionary Theory 7:93–106.Google Scholar
Walker, L. J., Wilkinson, B., and Ivany, L. C. 2002. Continental drift and Phanerozoic carbonate accumulation in shallow-shelf and deep-marine settings. Journal of Geology 110:75–87.Google Scholar