Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:39:36.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Functional evolution of the cheek tooth pattern and chewing direction in Tertiary horses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

John M. Rensberger
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences and Burke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Ann Forsten
Affiliation:
Zoological Institute, P. Rautatiekatu 13, 00100 Helsinki 10, Finland
Mikael Fortelius
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Division of Geology and Paleontology, University of Helsinki, Snellmaninkatu 5, 00170 Helsinki 17, Finland

Abstract

By digitizing the enamel configuration and calculating the overall directional tendencies of the enamel edges in complex equid dental patterns, quantitative changes in functional attributes were traced through a phylogenetic series. Pronounced changes both in the directional emphasis of the enamel edges and in the chewing motion occurred and were interrelated. Two distinct trends were found. From early Eocene to Oligocene, edge alignment became increasingly confined to a single direction, but the teeth retained the phase I and phase II chewing angles characteristic of many primitive herbivorous and omnivorous mammals. The chewing direction in the horizontal plane also remained essentially unchanged. During the Oligocene and the early Miocene, both edge direction and chewing direction remained stable. However, the middle Miocene genus Merychippus represents a stage in which the enamel directional emphasis was lost in transition to a new anteroposterior emphasis, a trend that continued into the late Tertiary equine taxa. Concurrent with this transformation was a loss of all but vestiges of the phase I and II chewing angles in the vertical plane and a shift of the chewing direction in the horizontal plane to an almost transverse movement of the jaw.

In the Oligocene equids, the edges of the labial cusps did attain perpendicularity to the phase I chewing direction, which was oblique to the horizontal plane, but the chewing direction in the horizontal plane was far from perpendicular to the lingual enamel edge direction because the lingual cusps were configured for efficiency in compressive, not shearing, motion that dominated the phase II surfaces. In the later Tertiary the chewing direction and edges attained essentially a perpendicular relationship, which represents the theoretical optimum for a shearing system. The radical change in edge direction in the Miocene probably occurred as a result of an increase in translative movement (longer glide) between the surfaces, making the lingual edges subject to selection for perpendicularity and flattening of the occlusal surface, resulting in a condition where a single edge direction became optimal for all cusps. The extended chewing stroke translation was perhaps the key event initiating the other changes and would have resulted from increased chewing effort accompanying a shift to a diet of mainly grass. The loss of the dual (shearing and compressive) function of the occlusal surface suggests that the earlier diet may have contained significant proportions of other plant parts, such as fruits, seeds, or tender leaves that might be optimally chewed by compressive movements.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahlgren, J. 1976. Masticatory movements in man. Pp. 119130. In: Anderson, D. J. and Matthews, B., eds. Mastication. John Wright & Sons; Bristol.Google Scholar
Bredon, R. M. and Wilson, J. 1963. The chemical composition and nutritive value of grasses from semi-arid areas of Karamoja as related to ecology and types of soil. E. Afr. Agr. Forestry J. 29:134142.Google Scholar
Butler, P. M. 1952. The milk-molars of Perissodactyla, with remarks on molar occlusion. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 121:777817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1889. The mechanical causes of the development of the hard parts of the Mammalia. J. Morphol. 3:137277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, A. W. and Hiiemae, K. M. 1970. Functional occlusion and mandibular movements during occlusion in the American opossum, Didelphis marsupialis L. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 49:2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortelius, M. 1981. Functional aspects of occlusal cheek-tooth morphology in hypsodont, nonruminant ungulates. Int. Symp. Concept. Meth. Paleontol. Barcelona, Contr. Papers. Pp. 153162.Google Scholar
Gwynne, M. D. and Bell, R. H. V. 1968. Selection of vegetation components by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti National Park. Nature. 220:390393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herring, S. W. and Scapino, R. P. 1973. Physiology of feeding in miniature pigs. J. Morphol. 141:427460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiiemae, K. M. 1978. Mammalian mastication: a review activity of the jaw muscles and the movements they produce in chewing. Pp. 359398. In: Butler, P. M. and Joysey, K. A., eds. Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Hiiemae, K. M. and Crompton, A. W. 1971. A cinefluorographic study of feeding in the American opossum, Didelphis marsupialis. Pp. 299334. In: Dahlberg, A. A., ed. Dental Morphology and Evolution. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Hiiemae, K. M. and Kay, R. F. 1973. Evolutionary trends in the dynamics of Primate mastication. In: Symp. Fourth Int. Cong. Primatol. 3:2864. Karger; Basel.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. 1861. Essays and Observations on Natural History, Anatomy. J. van Voorst; London.Google Scholar
Janis, C. M. 1979. Mastication in the hyrax and its relevance to ungulate dental evolution. Paleobiology. 5:5059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juko, C. D. and Bredon, R. M. 1961. The chemical composition of leaves and whole plant as an indicator of the range of available nutrients for selective grazing by cattle. Trop. Agr. Trinidad. 38:179187.Google Scholar
Kallen, F. C. and Gans, C. 1972. Mastication in the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus). J. Morphol. 136:385420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, R. F. and Hiiemae, K. M. 1974. Jaw movement and tooth use in Recent and fossil Primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 40:227256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luschei, E. S. and Goodwin, G. M. 1974. Patterns of mandibular movement and jaw activity during mastication in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 37:954966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, J. R. E. 1955. Ideal dental occlusion in the Primates. Dent. Pract., Bristol. 6:4761.Google Scholar
Mills, J. R. E. 1963. Occlusion and malocclusion of the teeth of Primates. Pp. 2952. In: Brothwell, D. R., ed. Dental Anthropology. Pergamon Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, J. R. E. 1967. A comparison of lateral movements in some mammals from wear facets on the teeth. Arch. Oral Biol. 12:645661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osborn, H. F. 1929. The titanotheres of ancient Wyoming, Dakota and Nebraska. Monogr. U.S. Geol. Surv. 55:1894.Google Scholar
Radinsky, L. 1983. Allometry and reorganization in horse skull proportions. Science. 221:11891191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rensberger, J. M. 1973. An occlusion model for mastication and dental wear in herbivorous mammals. J. Paleontol. 47:515528.Google Scholar
Rensberger, J. M. 1982. Patterns of dental change in two locally persistent successions of fossil aplodontid rodents. Pp. 323349. In: Kurten, B., ed. Teeth: Form, Function and Evolution. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Ryder, J. A. 1878. On the mechanical genesis of tooth-forms. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia. 1878:4580.Google Scholar
Ryder, J. A. 1879. On the mechanical genesis of tooth forms. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia. 1879:4751.Google Scholar
Stirton, R. A. 1940. Phylogeny of North American Equidae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 25:165198.Google Scholar
Walker, A., Hoeck, H., and Perez, L. 1978. Microwear of mammalian teeth as an indicator of diet. Science. 201:908910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, H. E. 1934. Revision of the Hyrachyidae. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull. 67:181295.Google Scholar