Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-xc2pj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-07T11:00:35.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extinction cascades and catastrophe in ancient food webs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Peter D. Roopnarine
Peter D. Roopnarine*
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Geology, California Academy of Sciences, 875 Howard St., San Francisco, California 94103. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A model is developed to explore the potential responses of paleocommunities to disruptions of primary production during times of mass extinction and ecological crisis. Disruptions of primary production are expected to generate bottom-up cascades of secondary extinction, and these are predictable given species richnesses, functional diversity, and trophic link distributions. If, however, consumers are permitted to compensate for the loss of trophic resources by increasing the intensities of their remaining biotic interactions, top-down driven catastrophic increases of secondary extinction emerge from the model. Both bottom-up and top-down effects are themselves controlled by the geometry of the food webs. The general Phanerozoic trends of increasing taxonomic and ecological diversities, as well as the varying strengths of biotic interactions, have led to food webs of increasing complexity. The frequency of catastrophic secondary extinction increases as food web complexity increases, but increased complexity also serves to dampen the magnitude of the secondary extinctions. When intraguild competitive interactions are included in the model, competitively inferior taxa are observed to possess greater probabilities of survival if the guilds are embedded in simple subnetworks of the overall food web. The result is the emergence of post-extinction guilds dominated by those inferior taxa. These results are congruent with empirical observations of “disaster taxa” dominance after some mass extinction events, and provide a mechanism for the reorganization of ecosystems that is observed after those events. The model makes the testable prediction that dominance by disaster taxa, however, should be observed only when bottom-up disruptions have caused ecosystems to collapse catastrophically.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , Winter 2006 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Albert, R., Jeong, H., and Barabási, A. 2000. Error and attack tolerance in complex networks. Nature 406:378–382.Google Scholar
Allmon, W. D. 2001. Nutrients, temperature, disturbance, and evolution: a model for the late Cenozoic marine record of the western Atlantic. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 166:9–26.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. C. 2001. Temporal and geographic size trends in Neogene Corbulidae (Bivalvia) of tropical America: using environmental sensitivity to decipher causes of morphologic trends. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 166:101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angielczyk, K. D., Roopnarine, P. D., and Wang, S. C. 2005. Modeling the role of primary productivity disruption in end-Permian extinctions, Karoo Basin, South Africa. Bulletin of the New Mexico Museum of Natural History (in press).Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1977. Species richness in marine benthic habitats through the Phanerozoic. Paleobiology 3:152–167.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1983. Ecospace utilization and guilds in marine communities through the Phanerozoic. Pp. 719–746 in Tevesz, M. and McCall, P., eds. Biotic interactions in Recent and fossil benthic communities. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1993. Seafood through time: changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology 19:372–397.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J., and Twitchett, R. J. 2003. How to kill (almost) all life: the end-Permian extinction event. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:358–365.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J., Tvredokhlebov, V. P., and Surkov, M. V. 2004. Ecosystem remodelling among vertebrates at the Permian-Triassic boundary in Russia. Nature 432:97–100.Google Scholar
Borrvall, C., Ebenman, B., and Jonsson, T. 2000. Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs. Ecology Letters 3:131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Camacho, J., Guimerà, R., and Amaral, L. A. N. 2002. Robust pattern in food web structures. Physical Review Letters 88(22):228102-1–228102-4.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, P. C., Wolters, V., Moore, J. C., and Winemiller, K. O. 2005. Food web ecology: playing jenga and beyond. Science 309:68–71.Google Scholar
Droser, M. L., Bottjer, D. J., Sheehan, P. M., and McGhee, G. R. 2000. Decoupling of taxonomic and ecologic severity of Phanerozoic marine mass extinctions. Geology 28:675–678.Google Scholar
Drossel, B., Higgs, P. G., and McKane, J. A. 2001. The influence of predator-prey population dynamics on the long-term evolution of food web structure. Journal of Theoretical Biology 208:91–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J., and Martinez, N. D. 2002. Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99:12917–12922.Google Scholar
Elton, C. 1927. Animal ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Eshet, Y., Rampino, M. R., and Visscher, H. 1995. Fungal event and palynological record of ecological crisis and recovery across the Permian-Triassic boundary. Geology 23:967–970.Google Scholar
Falkowski, P. G., Katz, M. E., Knoll, A. H., Quigg, A., Raven, J. A., Schofield, O., and Taylor, F. J. R. 2004. The evolution of modern eukaryotic plankton. Science 305:354–360.Google Scholar
Foster, C. B., Stephenson, M. H., Marshall, C., Logan, G. A., and Greenwood, P. F. 2002. A revision of Reduviasporonites Wilson 1962: description, illustration, comparison and biological affinities. Palynology 26:35–58.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, L., and Roughgarden, J. 1993. Construction and analysis of a large Caribbean food web. Ecology 74:1216–1233.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, L., and Roughgarden, J. 1997. Sampling effects and the estimation of food-web properties. Ecology 78:41–54.Google Scholar
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., and Slobodkin, L. B. 1960. Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist 94:421–425.Google Scholar
Havens, K. 1992. Scale and structure in natural food webs. Science 257:1107–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbour Symposium on Quantitative Biology 22:415–427.Google Scholar
Knoll, A. H., and Bambach, R. K. 2000. Directionality in the history of life: diffusion from the left wall or repeated scaling of the right. In Erwin, D. H. and Wing, S. L., eds. Deep time: Paleobiology's perspective. Paleobiology 26(Suppl. to No. 4):1–14.Google Scholar
Knoll, A. H., Bambach, R. K., Canfield, D. E., and Grotzinger, J. P. 1996. Comparative Earth history and Late Permian mass extinction. Geology 273:452–457.Google Scholar
Lande, R., and Engen, S., and Sæther, B. 2003. Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Leighton, L. R. 2004. Are we asking the right question? Palaios 19:313–315.Google Scholar
Levinton, J. S. 1996. Trophic group and the end-Cretaceous extinction: did deposit feeders have it made in the shade? Paleobiology 22:104–112.Google Scholar
Lindeman, R. 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23:399–418.Google Scholar
Loehle, C., and Li, B. 1996. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt revisited. Ecological Applications 6:784–789.Google Scholar
Looy, C. V., Brugman, W. A., Dilcher, D. L., and Visscher, H. 1999. The delayed resurgence of equatorial forests after the Permian-Triassic ecologic crisis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96:13857–13862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Looy, C. V., Twitchett, R. J., Dilcher, D. L., and Cittert, J. H. A. V. K.-V. 2001. Life in the end-Permian dead zone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:7879–7883.Google Scholar
Marjorum, P., Molitor, J., Plagnol, V., and Tavare, S. 2003. Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:15324–15328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. E. 1996. Secular increase in nutrient levels through the Phanerozoic: implications for productivity, biomass, diversity, and extinction of the marine biosphere. Paleontological Journal 30:637–643.Google Scholar
Martinez, N. D. 1992. Constant connectance in community food webs. American Naturalist 139:1208–1218.Google Scholar
May, R. M. 1973. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar
May, R. M. 2004. Uses and abuses of mathematics in biology. Science 303:790–793.Google Scholar
McCann, K., Hastings, A., and Huxel, G. R. 1998. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395:794–798.Google Scholar
McGhee, G. R., Sheehan, P. M., Bottjer, D. J., and Droser, M. L. 2004. Ecological ranking of Phanerozoic biodiversity crises: ecological and taxonomic severities are decoupled. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 211:289–297.Google Scholar
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., and Teller, A. H. 1953. Equation of state calculations of fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics 21:1087–1092.Google Scholar
Montoya, J. M., and Solé, R. V. 2002. Small world patterns in food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 214:405–412.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. J., and Navarrete, S. A. 2004. Mesoscale regulation comes from the bottom up: intertidal interactions between consumers and upwelling. Ecology Letters 7:31–41.Google Scholar
Olszewski, T. D., and Erwin, D. H. 2004. Dynamic response of Permian brachiopod communities to long-term environmental change. Nature 428:738–741.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1992. Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength. Nature 355:73–75.Google Scholar
Peters, R. H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pruss, S. B., and Bottjer, D. J. 2004. Early Triassic trace fossils of the Western United States and their implications for prolonged environmental stress from the end-Permian mass extinction. Palaios 19:551–564.Google Scholar
Quince, C., Higgs, P. G., and McKane, A. J. 2005. Deleting species from model food webs. Oikos 110:283–296.Google Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D. 1996. Systematics, biogeography and extinction of chionine bivalves (Early Oligocene–Recent) in the Late Neogene of tropical America. Malacologia 38:103–142.Google Scholar
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., and Walker, B. 2004. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596.Google Scholar
Schubert, J. K., and Bottjer, D. J. 1992. Early Triassic stromatolites as post-mass extinction disaster forms. Geology 20:883–886.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1981. A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology 7:36–53.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 10:246–267.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. M., and Hansen, T. A. 1986. Detritus feeding as a buffer to extinction at the end of the Cretaceous. Geology 14:868–870.Google Scholar
Solé, R. V., Montoya, J. M., and Erwin, D. H. 2002. Recovery after mass extinction: evolutionary assembly in large-scale biosphere dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 357:697–707.Google Scholar
Tang, C. M. 2001. Stability in ecological and paleoecological systems: variability at both short and long timescales. Pp. 63–81 in Allmon, W. D. and Bottjer, D. J., eds. Evolutionary paleoecology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Tillman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L., and Nowak, M. A. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66.Google Scholar
Todd, J. A., Jackson, J. B. C., Johnson, K. G., Fortunato, H. M., Heitz, A., Alvarez, M., and Jung, P. 2002. The ecology of extinction: molluscan feeding and faunal turnover in the Caribbean Neogene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:571–577.Google Scholar
Vajda, V., and McLoughlin, S. 2004. Fungal proliferation at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Science 303:1489.Google Scholar
van Nes, E. H., and Scheffer, M. 2004. Large species shifts triggered by small forces. American Naturalist 164:255–266.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1987. Evolution and escalation: an ecological history of life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1995. Economics, volcanoes, and Phanerozoic revolutions. Paleobiology 21:125–152.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 2004. Ecological avalanches and the two kinds of extinction. Evolution Ecology Research 6:315–337.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Petuch, E. J. 1986. Differential extinction in tropical American molluscs: endemism, architecture, and the Panama land bridge. Malacologia 17:29–41.Google Scholar
Visscher, H., Brinkhuis, H., Dilcher, D. L., Elsik, W. C., Eshet, Y., Looy, C. V., Rampino, M. R., and Traverse, A. 1996. The terminal Paleozoic fungal event: evidence of terrestrial ecosystem destabilization and collapse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 93:2155–2158.Google Scholar
Wilf, P., and Johnson, K. R. 2004. Land plant extinction at the end of the Cretaceous: a quantitative analysis of the North Dakota megafloral record. Paleobiology 30:347–368.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. J., and Martinez, N. D. 2000. Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404:180–183.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J., Berlow, E. L., Dunne, J. A., Barabási, A., and Martinez, N. D. 2002. Two degrees of separation in complex food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99:12913–12916.Google Scholar
Worm, B., and Duffy, J. E. 2003. Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:628–632.Google Scholar
Zachos, J. C., Arthur, M. A., and Dean, W. F. 1989. Geochemical evidence for suppression of pelagic marine productivity at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Nature 337:61–64.Google Scholar