Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:19:06.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The completeness of the continental fossil record and its impact on patterns of diversification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Attila Kalmar  and
David J. Currie
Attila Kalmar
Affiliation:
Ottawa-Carleton Institute of Biology, University of Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie Priv., Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
David J. Currie
Affiliation:
Ottawa-Carleton Institute of Biology, University of Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie Priv., Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Did organisms diversify in different ways on land and in the marine realm over the Phanerozoic, or do the different diversification curves of continental and marine organisms reflect primarily methodological artifacts? To answer this question, a quantitative assessment of the completeness of the global continental fossil record is indispensable. We used comparisons between continental and marine fossil diversity and between past and present-day patterns of continental diversity to assess the absolute and relative completeness of the continental fossil record. Collector's curves of the number of described families over the past 200 years suggest that the global continental fossil record, and even that of European and North American tetrapods, is still highly incomplete. Nevertheless, relative proportions of major continental and marine taxa, patterns of tetrapod endemism, and familial durations suggest that the family-level continental fossil record is reasonably representative. We found that, although continental fossil richness is correlated with the amount of terrestrial clastic sediment available for sampling, the exponential diversification curve of continental metazoans is unlikely to be an artifact of this rock bias. Diversification of the continental fauna appears to have been essentially exponential since the Devonian, with little evidence of major extinction events.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , Winter 2010 , pp. 51 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adrain, J. M., and Westrop, S. R. 2003. Paleodiversity: we need new data. Paleobiology 29:22–25.Google Scholar
Alba, D. M., Agustí, J., and Moya-Sola, S. 2001. Completeness of the mammalian fossil record in the Iberian Neogene. Paleobiology 27:79–83.Google Scholar
Alroy, J., Marshall, C. R., Bambach, R. K., Bezusko, K., Foote, M., Fürsich, F. T., Hansen, T. A., Holland, S. M., Ivany, L. C., Jablonski, D., Jacobs, D. K., Jones, D. C., Kosnik, M. A., Lidgard, S., Low, S., Miller, A. I., Novack-Gottshall, P. M., Olszewski, T. D., Patzkowsky, M. E., Raup, D. M., Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Sommers, M. G., Wagner, P. J., and Webber, A. 2001. Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:6261–6266.Google Scholar
Badgley, C. 2003. The multiple scales of biodiversity. Paleobiology 29:11–13. Benton, M. J. 1993. The fossil record 2. Chapman and Hall, London.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badgley, C. 1994. Paleontological data and identifying mass extinctions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:181–185.Google Scholar
Badgley, C. 1996a. On the nonprevalence of competitive replacement in the evolution of tetrapods. Pp. 185–210 in Erwin, D. H., Jablonski, D., and Lipps, J., eds. Evolutionary paleobiology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Badgley, C. 1996b. Testing the roles of competition and expansion in tetrapod evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263:641–646.Google Scholar
Badgley, C. 1997. Models for the diversification of life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:490–495.Google Scholar
Badgley, C. 2001. Biodiversity on land and in the sea. Geological Journal 36:211–230.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J., and Simms, M. J. 1995. Testing the marine and continental fossil records. Geology 23:601–604.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J., Hitchin, R., and Wills, M. A. 1999. Assessing congruence between cladistic and stratigraphic data. Systematic Biology 48:581–596.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J., Wills, M. A., and Hitchin, R. 2000. Quality of the fossil record through time. Nature 403:534–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleveland, W. S. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:829–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fara, E. 2002. Sea-level variation and the quality of the continental fossil record. Journal of the Geological Society, London 159:489–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, M. 2003. Origination and extinction through the Phanerozoic: a new approach. Journal of Geology 111:125–148.Google Scholar
Fountaine, T. M. R., Benton, M. J., Gareth, J. D., and Nudds, R. L. 2005. The quality of the fossil record of Mesozoic birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272:289–294.Google Scholar
Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., and Smith, A. G. 2004. A geologic time scale 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B., Armstrong, R. L., and Cox, C. V. 1990. A geologic time scale 1989. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1999. The future of the fossil record. Science 284:2114–2116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K. G. 2003. New data for old questions. Paleobiology 29:19–21.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., and Holland, S. M. 2002. The quality of the fossil record: implications for evolutionary analyses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:561–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, P. J., Motohiro, Y., and Marshall, C. R. 2006. Phanerozoic marine biodiversity dynamics in light of the incompleteness of the fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:2736–2739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, W. D., and Benton, M. J. 1990. Historical tests of the absolute completeness of the fossil record of tetrapods. Paleobiology 16:322–335.Google Scholar
McGowan, A. J., and Smith, A. B. 2008. Are global Phanerozoic marine diversity curves truly global? A study of the relationship between regional rock records and global Phanerozoic marine diversity. Paleobiology 34:80–103.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1998. Biotic transitions in global marine diversity. Science 281:1157–1160.Google Scholar
Padian, K., and Clemens, W. A. 1985. Terrestrial vertebrate diversity: episodes and insights. Pp. 41–96 in Valentine, J. W., ed. Phanerozoic diversity patterns. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar
Palmer, M. W. 1990. The estimation of species richness by extrapolation. Ecology 71:1195–1198.Google Scholar
Parker, S. P., ed. 1982. Synopsis and classification of living organisms. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E., and Foote, M. 2001. Biodiversity in the Phanerozoic: a reinterpretation. Paleobiology 27:583–601.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976a. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: a tabulation. Paleobiology 2:279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976b. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: an interpretation. Paleobiology 2:289–297.Google Scholar
Ronov, A. B., Khain, V. E., Balukhovsky, A. N., and Seslavinsky, K. B. 1980. Quantitative analysis of Phanerozoic sedimentation. Sedimentary Geology 25:311–325.Google Scholar
Sadler, P. M. 1981. Sediment accumulation rates and the completeness of stratigraphical sections. Journal of Geology 89:569–584.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. American Naturalist 102:243–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindel, D. E. 1982. The gaps in the fossil record. Nature 297:282–284.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1992. A compendium of fossil marine animal families, 2d ed. Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology 83:1–156.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1998. Rates of speciation in the fossil record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353:315–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Bambach, R.K., Raup, D. M., and Valentine, J. W. 1981. Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record. Nature 293:435–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signor, P. W. 1990. The geologic history of diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:509–539.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 2003. Getting the measure of diversity. Paleobiology 29:34–36.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B., and McGowan, A. J. 2008. Temporal patterns of barren intervals in the Phanerozoic. Paleobiology 34:155–161.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B., Gale, A. S., and Monks, N. E. A. 2001. Sea-level change and rock-record bias in the Cretaceous: a problem for extinction and biodiversity studies. Paleobiology 27:241–253.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarver, J. E., Braddy, S. J., and Benton, M. J. 2007. The effects of sampling bias on Palaeozoic faunas and implications for macroevolutionary studies. Paleontology 50:177–184.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1989. How good was the fossil record? Clues from the California Pleistocene. Paleobiology 15:83–94.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Leighton, L. R. 2003. Does global diversity mean anything? Paleobiology 29:3–7.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, P. J., and Sidor, C. A. 2000. Age rank : clade rank metrics—sampling, taxonomy, and the meaning of “stratigraphic consistency.” Systematic Biology 49:463–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed