Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:52:07.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Vicuña

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In form the vicuna resembles the guanaco, but it is smaller and slenderer. Its colour is not easy to describe and in South America people simply refer to “vicuña colour” which varies from pale fawn, through vermilion and golden to strongly fulvous. The vicuña has no black on its face as has the guanaco. From the throat to the knees there is a pure white tuft, the belly and inner sides of the limbs are white also. The vicuña stands from 28 to 35 inches (70 to 90 cm.) high at the shoulder, its average size decreasing from south to north. Its wool is shorter but much finer than that of the guanaco and is probably the finest and lightest wool in the world.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1954

References

Allen, Glover M., 1942. Extinct and Vanishing Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, Washington, pp. 409412.Google Scholar
Cabrera, Angel, and Yepes, José, 1940. Mamiferos Sudamericanos. Buenos Aires, pp. 267–9.Google Scholar
Dennler de la Tour, Georges, 1941. La protección a la naturaleza en el Congreso Panamericano de Lima. Rev. Arg. Zoogeogr., Buenos Aires, vol. i, No. 2.Google Scholar
Dennler de la Tour, Georges, 1943. Coordinación intersudamericana de las medidas de protectión a la fauna. Rev. Arg. Zoogeogr., vol. iii, No. 3, pp. 129133.Google Scholar
Dennler de la Tour, Georges, 1944. La protocción a la fauna necesita acción y espíritu concordantes de todos los paises del continente. Diana, vol. vii, No. 56.Google Scholar
Dennler de la Tour, Georges, 1949. Liste des animaux menacés ou en voie de disparition en Argentine. Rapport au Congrès de Lake Success, UIPN and UNESCO.Google Scholar
Dennler de la Tour, Georges, 1952. La preservación de la fauna en región semi-árida. Parte VIIa. La Puna de Atacama y la Pampa de Tamarugal. Diana, No. 155.Google Scholar
Dennler de la Tour, Georges, 1952. Préservation de la faune dans les zones semi-arides des Cordilères des Andes chiliennes-argentines. En collab, avec Mr. C. A. Finsterbusch. Congrès de Caracas de I'UIPN. Rapport 20.Google Scholar
Gutierrez Madueño, C., 1912. Monografía de la vicuña. Lima : IV° Congreso Científico Panam.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Eduardo A., 1901. La vicuña. An. Soc. Rur. Arg., vol. 36.Google Scholar
Lydekkeh, Richard, 1915. Catalogue of the Ungulate Mammals, vol. 4 Camelidae.Google Scholar
Maccagno, Luis, 1932. Los Auquénidos Peruanos. Lima.Google Scholar
Molina, J. Ignacio, 1782. Saggio sulle storia naturale del Chile, pp. 313–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oviedo Y Valdes Capitan Gonzalo Fernandez De, 1535. Historia General y Natural de Indias, Libro XII, Cap. XXX, p. 418.Google Scholar
Pan American Union, 1940. Documentary Material on Nature Protection and Wild Life Preservation in Latin America, vol. i, part 2. Washington.Google Scholar
Romero, Elias C., 1927. Llamas y Alpacas, Vicuñas y Guanacos. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Thomas, Oldfield, 1917. Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 68, No. 4.Google Scholar
Tschudi, Johann Jacob Von, 1844. Fauna Peruana.Google Scholar