Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:38:09.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two new Brazilian primates discovered, endangered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Stephen F. Ferrari
Affiliation:
Departamento de Génetica, Universidade Federal do Pará, Caixa Postal 8607, 66.0757–150 Belém-PA, Brazil.
Helder L. Queiroz
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoologia, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belém, Brazil.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Field studies at distant sites in Brazilian Amazonia have brought to light two new species of primate, the black-headed marmoset Callithrix nigriceps and the Ka'apor capuchin Cebus kaapori. Little is known about either species, although both appear to have small geographical ranges in regions with relatively high human densities and where habitat-degrading activities, such as logging and mining, have been intensifying over the past two decades. These discoveries highlight the uncertain nature of our understanding of primate diversity in what is probably the biologically richest nation on earth. They also underline the urgent need for more detailed information from many areas, especially southern Amazonia, where habitat destruction is increasing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1994

References

Ayres, J.M.C. 1985. On a new species of squirrel monkey, genus Saimiri, from Brazilian Amazonia (Primates, Cebidae). Pap. Avul. Zool., Univ. S. Paulo, 36, 147164.Google Scholar
Baal, F.L.J., Mittermeier, R.A. and van Roosmalen, M.G.M. 1988. Primates and protected areas in Suriname. Oryx, 22, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balée, W.L. 1988. Ka'apor: forêt en otage dans l'état du Maranhão. Ethnies, 106110.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.L. 1988. The tropical forest canopy: the heart of biotic diversity. In Biodiversity (ed. Wilson, E. O.), pp. 123129. National Academy Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Fearnside, P.M. 1984. A floresta vai acabar? Ciência Hoje, 10, 4352.Google Scholar
Fearnside, P.M. and Ferreira, G. de L. 1984. Roads in Rondônia: highway construction and the farce of unprotected reserves in Brazil's Amazon forest. Environmental Conservation, 11, 358360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearnside, P.M. and Salati, E. 1985. Explosive deforestation in Rondônia, Brazil. Environmental Conservation, 12, 355356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, S.F. and Lopes, M.A. 1990. A survey of primates in central Pará. Bol. Mus. Para. E. Goeldi. Zool. 6, 169179.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S.F. and Lopes, M.A. 1992. A new species of marmoset, genus Callithrix Erxleben 1777 (Callitrichidae, Primates), from western Brazilian Amazonia. Goeldiana Zool. 12, 113.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S.F., Lopes, M.A. and Krause, E.A.K. 1993. Gut morphology of Callithrix nigriceps and Saguinus labiatus from western Brazilian Amazonia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 90, 487493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrari, S.F. and Mendes, S.L. 1991. Buffy-headed marmoset ten years on. Oryx, 25, 105109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, C. and Oppenheimer, J.R. 1981. The capuchin monkeys, genus Cebus. In Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates (eds Coimbra-Filho, A. F. and Mittermeier, R. A.), Vol. 1. pp. 331390. Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Goeldi, E.A. and Hagmann, G. 1906. Prodromo de um catálogo critico, comentado da coleçcão do Museu do Pará (18947–1903). Bol. Mus. Goeldi (Mus. Para.) Hist. Nat. Ethnogr. IV, 38122..Google Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. 1963. A systematic and zoogeographical account of the monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae) of the Amazonas and Orinoco river basins. Mammalia, 27, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. 1977. Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini), Vol. 1. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. 1984. Taxonomy of squirrel monkeys genus Saimiri (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): a preliminary report with a description of a hitherto unnamed form. Am. J. Primatol. 7, 155210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. 1990. Titis, new world monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): a preliminary taxonomic review. Fieldiana Zool. 55.Google Scholar
Kuliopulos, H. 1990. Amazonian biodiversity. Science, 248, 1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorini, M.L. and Persson, V.G. 1990. Nova espécie de Leontopithecus Lesson 1840, do sul do Brasil (Primates, Callitrichidae). Bol. Mus. Nac. 338.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A. 1986. Primate conservation priorities in the neotropical region. In Primates, The Road to Self-Sustaining Populations (ed. Benirschke, K.), pp. 221240. Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A. and Oates, J.F. 1985. Primate diversity: the world's top countries. Primate Conserv. 5, 4148.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A., Coimbra-Filho, A.F., Constable, I.D., Rylands, A.B. and Valle, C.M.C. 1982. Conservation of primates in the Atlantic Forest of eastern Brazil. Int. Zoo Ybk. 22, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B. and Coimbra-Filho, A.F. 1988. Systematics: species and subspecies an update. In Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates (eds Mittermeier, R. A., Rylands, A. B., Coimbra-Filho, A. F. and da Fonseca, G. A. B.), Vol. 2. pp. 1375. World Wildlife Fund-US, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A., Schwarz, M. and Ayres, J.M.C. 1992. A new species of marmoset, genus Callithrix Erxleben, 1777 (Callitrichidae, Primates) from the Rio Maués region, state of Amazonas, central Brazilian Amazonia. Goeldiana Zool. 14, 117.Google Scholar
Nelson, B.W., Ferreira, C.A.C., da Silva, M.F. and Kawasaki, M.L. 1990. Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brazilian Amazonia. Nature, 345, 715719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oren, D.C. 1988. Uma reserva biológica para o Maranhão. Ciência Hoje, 44, 3645.Google Scholar
Queiroz, H.L. 1992. A new species of capuchin monkey, genus Cebus Erxleben 1777 (Cebidae: Primates), from eastern Brazilian Amazonia. Goeldiana Zool. 15, 113.Google Scholar
Queiroz, H.L. In press. Os índios Guajà e os primatas da Amazônia maranhense: um caso de sustentabilidade de caça. In A Primatologia no Brasil 4 (eds Yamamoto, M. E. and de Sousa, M. B. C.). Sociedade Brasileira de Primatologia, Natal.Google Scholar
Redford, K. and Robinson, J.G. 1987. A game of choice: patterns of indian and colonist hunting in the Neotropics. Am. Anthropol. 89, 650667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J.G. and Janson, C.H. 1987. Capuchins, squirrel monkeys and atelines: socioecological convergence with old world primates. In Primate Societies (eds Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. W., Wrangham, R. W. and Struhsaker, T. T.), pp. 6982. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rylands, A.B. and Mittermeier, R.A. 1982 Parks, reserves and primate conservation in Brazilian Amazonia. Oryx, 17, 7887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, M.F. and Rylands, A.B. 1988. The marmosets, genus Callithrix. In Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates (eds Mittermeier, R. A., Rylands, A. B., Coimbra-Filho, A. F. and da Fonseca, G. A. B.), Vol. 2. pp. 131222. World Wildlife Fund-US, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Templeton, A.R. 1986. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity (ed. Soulé, M. E.), pp. 105116. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland Mass.Google Scholar
Terborgh, J. 1983. Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
Thorington, R.W. 1985. The taxonomy and distribution of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri). In Handbook of Squirrel Monkey Research (eds Rosenblum, R. A. and Coe, C. L.), pp. 133. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
de Vivo, M. 1991. Taxonomia de Callithrix Erxleben 1777 (Callitrichidae, Primates). Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.Google Scholar
Wetterberg, G.B., Padua, M.T.J., Castro, C.S. de and Vasconcellos, J.M.C. 1976. Uma análise de prioridades em conservação da natureza na Amazônia. Projeto de Desenvolvimento e Pesquisa Florestal (PRODEPEF). PNUD/FAO/IBDF/BRA–15. Série Tecnica. 8. 62 pp.Google Scholar