Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:37:53.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sustainable management of the saiga antelope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

E. J. Milner-Gulland
Affiliation:
Ecosystems Analysis and Management Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Warwick University, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The saiga antelope is exploited principally for its horn. Two major factors will influence the manager's decision about the best sustainable hunting strategy for the saiga: the climatic unpredictability of the region in which it lives and the effects of highly selective hunting for males on the population dynamics of the species. This paper discusses these factors and assesses the prospects for sustainable management of the saiga.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1994

References

Bannikov, A.G., Zhirnov, L.V., Lebedeva, L.S. and Fandeev, A.A. 1961. Biologiya saigaka (The Biology of the Saiga). Isdatel'stvo sel'skokhozyaistvennoi literaturi jurnalov i plakatov, Moscow.Google Scholar
Beddington, J.R. 1974. Age structure, sex ratio and population density in the harvesting of natural animal populations. journal of Applied Ecology, 11, 915924.Google Scholar
Caughley, G. 1977. Analysis of Vertebrate Populations. John Wiley and Son, New York.Google Scholar
Fadeev, A.A. and Sludsky, A.A. 1982. Saigak v Kazakhstane (Saiga in Kazakhstan). Academy of Sciences, Kazakhstan, Alma-Ata.Google Scholar
Fairall, N. 1985. Manipulation of age and sex ratios to optimize production from impala populations. South African journal of Wildlife Research, 15, 8588.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, J.R. and Milner-Gulland, E.J. 1994. Sex-biased harvesting in ungulates: conservation and sustainable use. Conservation Biology, 8, 157166.Google Scholar
Kuzyakin, V.A. 1985. Sostoyaniye resursov dikik kopytnkh (The status of wild ungulate resources). Problema upravleniya resursami dikik kopytnykh. Itogi nauki i tekhniki: sen's Zoologiya pozvonoynykh, 13, 14.Google Scholar
Luxmoore, R. 1989. International trade. In Wildlife Production Systems (eds Hudson, R. J., Drew, K. R. and Baskin, L. M.), pp. 414423. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E.J. 1991. The exploitation of certain large mammals for trade: implications for management. PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E.J. 1994. A population model for the management of the saiga antelope. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 2539.Google Scholar
Sludsky, A.A. 1963. Dzhuty v evrazyskikh stepyakh i pustynyakh (Dzhuts in the Eurasian steppes and deserts). Trudy In-ta Zoology ANKazSSR, 10. Academy of Sciences, Kazakhstan, Alm-Ata.Google Scholar
Tikhonov, A. 1979. Promysel saigaka v zapadnom prikaspy (The exploitation of the saiga in the Western Precaspian). Okhota i okhotnichye khozyaystvo, 1, 89.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, B.V., Lebedev, V.V., Kulik, K.N. and Kaptsov, A.N. 1985. Measurement of ecological desertification from repeat aerospace photographs. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 285, 16.Google Scholar
Zhirnov, L.V. 1982a. Vozrashchyonnye k zhizni (Revival). Lesnaya promyshlennost, Moscow.Google Scholar
Zhirnov, L.V. 1982b. Modelirovaniye dinamiki populatsy saigakov (Modelling the dynamics of a saiga population). Isvestiya TSKhA, 5, 157165.Google Scholar