Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:31:21.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A reply to the response by Holt, Papastavrou & Phillips to CITES Conference of Parties 11: an FFI perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Robin Sharp
Robin Sharp
Affiliation:
Trustee, Fauna & Flora International, Great Eastern House, Tenison Road, Cambridge CB1 2TT, UK, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters
Information
Oryx , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 172 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 2001

References

CITES Secretariat (2000) Letter from Willem Wijnstekers, Secretary-General, to Michael Canny, Chairman, International Whaling Commission, dated Geneva, 4 07 2000.Google Scholar
Holt, S., Papatavrou, V. & Phillips, C. (2000) Letters: response to report on the CITES conference in Nairobi, insofar as it refers to whales. Oryx, 35, 84–85.Google Scholar
IUCN (2000) Statement to the 52nd Meeting of the International Whaling Commission. IWC/52/OS/IUCN, Adelaide, 3 07 2000.Google Scholar
IUCN Species Survival Commission & TRAFFIC Network (2000) Analyses of Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices. 02 2000. CITES Inf. 1.1.8, p. 61.Google Scholar
Sharp, R. (2000) CITES conference of the Parties 11: an FFI perspective. Oryx, 34, 228–230.Google Scholar