Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:20:53.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rediscovery of the Bornean bay cat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Mel Sunquist
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife and Range Sciences and Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Charles Leh
Affiliation:
Sarawak Museum, Kuching, Malaysia Fiona SunquistUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
Daphne M. Hills
Affiliation:
Mammal Section, The Natural History Museum, London
Rajanathan Rajaratnam
Affiliation:
Senior Scientific Officer, World Wide Fund for Nature, Sabah, Malaysia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The bay cat Catopuma badia has been rediscovered in Borneo, where it is endemic and where there have been no confirmed sightings since 1928. In November 1992 an adult female, which had been captured by native trappers on the Sarawak-Indonesian border and kept in captivity for some months, was brought into the Sarawak Museum on the point of death. It was only the seventh known specimen and the first of a whole animal. In appearance it bears a striking resemblance to Temminck's cat C. temminckii, although it is much smaller. Genetic analysis of blood and tissue samples will assist in clarifying its taxonomic status.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1994

References

Anon. 1986. Cat News, No. 5, 11.Google Scholar
CITES. 1991. Appendices I, II, and III to The Conventionc on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. September, 1991. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E. 1874. Description of a new species of cat (Felis badia) from Sarawak. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1874, 322323.Google Scholar
Groves, C.P. 1982. Cranial and dental characteristics in the systematics of Old World Felidae. Carnivore, 5, 2839.Google Scholar
Hemmer, H. 1978. The evolutionary systematics of living Felidae: present status and current problems. Carnivore, 1, 7178.Google Scholar
Hose, C. 1893. A Descriptive Account of the Mammals of Borneo. Edward Abbott, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN. 1990. 1990 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Jentink, F.A. 1901. On Felis badia Gray. Notes from the Leyden Museum, 23, 9193.Google Scholar
Lekagul, B. and McNeely, J.A. 1977. Mammals of Thailand. Association for the Conservation of Wildlife, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Pocock, R.I. 1932. The marbled cat (Pardofelis marmorata) and some other Oriental species, with the definition of a new genus of the Felidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 132, 741766.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife. Service. 1991. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 37 pp.Google Scholar
Weigel, I. 1961. Das Fellmuster der wildlebenden Katzenarten und der Hauskatze in Vergleichender und Stammesgeschichtlicher Hinsicht. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen, 9, 1120.Google Scholar
Wozencraft, W.C. 1993. Order Carnivora. In Mammal Species of the World (eds Wilson, D. E. and Reeder, D. M.), 2nd edn., pp. 279348. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar