Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:52:47.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New records, potential distribution, and conservation of the Near Threatened cave bat Natalus macrourus in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2017

Mariana Delgado-Jaramillo
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ciência Aplicada à Conservação da Biodiversidade, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Rua Nelson Chaves s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco 50670-901, Brazil.
Eder Barbier
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ciência Aplicada à Conservação da Biodiversidade, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Rua Nelson Chaves s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco 50670-901, Brazil.
Enrico Bernard*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ciência Aplicada à Conservação da Biodiversidade, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Rua Nelson Chaves s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco 50670-901, Brazil.
*
(Corresponding author) E-mail [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Species with specific roosting, foraging or breeding requirements are particularly vulnerable to habitat loss and degradation. For bats, the availability and environmental condition of caves can be a limiting factor. The cave specialist Natalus macrourus (formerly Natalus espiritosantensis) is categorized as Near Threatened on the IUCN Red List but as Vulnerable in Brazil, based on a projected population reduction and a decline in its area of occupancy, extent of occurrence and/or quality of habitat. There is a lack of knowledge about the species’ distribution, natural history and ecology, information that is required for conservation. Using new occurrence data and potential distribution modelling we evaluated the distribution of N. macrourus in Brazil, analysed pressures on and threats to the species, and assessed the species’ conservation needs. Natalus macrourus is positively associated with areas with higher probability of cave occurrence and negatively associated with areas of high variation in mean daily temperature and mean annual rainfall. Areas with high environmental suitability for N. macrourus correspond to only 3% of the potential distribution modelled. We estimate that the species has already lost 54% of its natural habitat and that there is < 35% of habitat remaining in areas with high environmental suitability. We calculated that approximately half of the caves in areas with high environmental suitability are < 5 km from mining operations and only 4% of the species’ potential distribution lies within protected areas. Given the strong association of N. macrourus with caves, it is important to protect these habitats, and we recommend that caves where the species is present should receive immediate protection.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2017 

Introduction

Species with specific roosting, foraging and/or breeding requirements tend to be particularly vulnerable to habitat loss and degradation (e.g. Jones et al., Reference Jones, Purvis and Gittleman2003; Cardillo et al., Reference Cardillo, Mace, Jones, Bielby, Bininda-Emonds and Sechrest2005; Davidson et al., Reference Davidson, Hamilton, Boyer, Brown and Ceballos2009). In the case of bats, the availability and environmental condition of caves can be a limiting factor for several species (Glover & Altringham, Reference Glover and Altringham2008), and the conservation of caves is frequently highlighted as being a priority for bats (Arita, Reference Arita1996; Goodman et al., Reference Goodman, Andriafidison, Andrianaivoarivelo, Cardiff, Ifticene and Jenkins2005; Kingston, Reference Kingston2010; Bernard et al., Reference Bernard, Aguiar, Brito, Cruz-Neto, Gregorin, Machado, Freitas and Vieira2012).

Endemic to the Neotropics, species of the family Natalidae are considered to be cave specialists (Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011). These insectivorous bats have funnel-shaped ears, and their tails are usually longer than their total body length (Gardner, Reference Gardner and Gardner2008; Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011). All males have a natalid organ, located on the dorsal surface of the muzzle, which secretes a substance that can facilitate intraspecific communication (Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011). Bats of this family are light (2–12 g) and small (forearm length 26–51 mm; Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011). Currently, there are three extant recognized genera in the family: Chilonatalus, Natalus and Nyctiellus (Morgan & Czaplewski, Reference Morgan and Czaplewski2003; Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011; Nogueira et al., Reference Nogueira, Lima, Moratelli, Tavares, Gregorin and Peracchi2014).

Eight species of Natalus are known: N. jamaicensis, N. lanatus, N. macrourus, N. major, N. mexicanus, N. primus, N. stramineus and N. tumidirostris (Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011). In South America, south of the Amazon River, only the species N. macrourus (formerly known as N. espiritosantensis) is known to occur, in Bolivia, Brazil and Paraguay (Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011; Garbino & Tejedor, Reference Garbino and Tejedor2012). Natalus macrourus is categorized as Near Threatened on the IUCN Red List (Tejedor & Davalos, Reference Tejedor and Davalos2016) but it is one of the six bat species officially designated as threatened in Brazil, where it is categorized as Vulnerable on the basis of a projected population reduction associated with a decline in its area of occupancy, extent of occurrence and/or quality of habitat (criterion A3c; MMA, 2014). Although N. macrourus has a larger distribution than other congeneric species, records are rare within its range (Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011), and there is still a paucity of knowledge about its biology, ecology and natural history.

In this study we (1) addressed gaps in the known distribution of N. macrourus in Brazil, obtaining new records for the north-eastern region, (2) updated data on the distribution of the species in Brazil, (3) used these data together with climate and environmental modelling to generate a refined map of the potential distribution of the species in Brazil, (4) analysed pressures on and threats to the species, and (5) assessed its conservation needs.

Methods

Current and potential distribution

We reviewed the available records of N. macrourus in Brazil by searching the scientific literature for the key words Natalus and Natalidae in Web of Science (2015) and Google Scholar (2015). In addition, we searched for records in the databases of the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio, 2016), speciesLink (2015), VertNet (2015) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, 2015; Supplementary Table S1).

The records obtained from the literature were converted into points of occurrence and used to model the potential distribution of N. macrourus in Brazil (Supplementary Table S1). Each record was checked and filtered for mistakes in location and/or taxonomy (Peterson et al., Reference Peterson, Soberón, Pearson, Anderson, Martínez-Meyer, Nakamura and Araújo2011). Points that are too close and under the same environmental conditions can bias the modelling as a result of so-called spatial autocorrelation (Boria et al., Reference Boria, Olson, Goodman and Anderson2014). To reduce the inherent geographical biases associated with collection data and avoid spatial autocorrelation problems, we produced a map of environmental heterogeneity, using the bioclimatic variables available from WorldClim (2015), and removed records that were within 25 km of one another under the same environmental conditions, keeping the maximum possible number of localities. This resulted in 50 single localities.

Using MaxEnt (Phillips et al., Reference Phillips, Anderson and Schapire2006), we generated various distribution models for N. macrourus, based on two sets of variables at 1 km2 resolution. To avoid collinearity among bioclimatic variables (i.e. when two variables are highly correlated) we calculated Pearson correlations for the 22 variables available in the WorldClim database and, for those with ≥ 80% correlation, eliminated the one with the lowest contribution. Following this selection, for the first set of variables we considered nine bioclimatic variables derived from temperature and rainfall (mean daily temperature range, isothermality, temperature seasonality, maximum temperature in the warmest month, mean temperature in the wettest quarter, mean temperature in the coldest quarter, annual rainfall, rainfall in the driest quarter, rainfall in the warmest quarter). In the second set we considered the same nine bioclimatic variables plus altitude, the normalized difference vegetation index (a proxy for measuring vegetation cover) and a categorical variable of the potential occurrence of caves in Brazil, produced by the National Centre for Cave Research. The shapefile for the potential occurrence of caves in Brazil was produced using data on the location of the main karst regions of Brazil, the geological map of the country, georeferenced records of caves in the database of the National Centre for Cave Research, and the main lithological formations of the caves. We used this approach because N. macrourus is generally regarded as a cave-dwelling species (Tejedor & Davalos, Reference Tejedor and Davalos2016). Considering that only a small fraction of Brazilian caves are known, we adopted potential occurrence as a proxy for cave existence in a given area. The National Centre for Cave Research categorizes the potential of cave occurrence in Brazil as unlikely, low, medium, high and very high. In our analysis we scored these categories 0–4, and used the scores to refine the modelling of the potential distribution of N. macrourus.

We conducted various tests to find the best parametrization for MaxEnt (Radosavljevic & Anderson, Reference Radosavljevic and Anderson2014). We set the program to use 80% of the data to calibrate the model and 20% for the test, using n − 1 replicates, where n is the number of records of occurrence, as suggested by Pearson et al. (Reference Pearson, Raxworthy, Nakamura and Peterson2007). To assess the predictive capacity of the models we used the area under the curve (AUC); the best-performing models had AUC values close to 1, whereas AUC values close to 0.5 indicated models were equal to or worse than random (Phillips & Dudík, Reference Phillips and Dudík2008).

Conservation scenarios for the species

To mitigate the occurrence of false positives (commission errors), the potential distribution generated included a buffer of 300 km around the minimum convex polygon produced with known points of occurrence. Considering the minimum training presence threshold (i.e. the lowest predicted value associated with any one of the observed presence records; Peterson et al., Reference Peterson, Soberón, Pearson, Anderson, Martínez-Meyer, Nakamura and Araújo2011; Radosavljevic & Anderson, Reference Radosavljevic and Anderson2014), our analysis indicated 18% as the threshold for the presence of Natalus. Therefore, we categorized the potential distribution according to occurrence probability: very low (< 18%), low (18–25%), medium (26–50%), high (51–75%) and very high (> 75%). We overlapped the potential distribution generated with three other datasets: (1) deforested areas in Brazil until 2009 (SISCOM, 2015), (2) potential occurrence of caves (CECAV, 2015), and (3) boundaries of fully protected areas as of 2011 (MMA, 2016). This overlap facilitated the calculation of the area of occupation of the species, the number of potential roosts within that area, and the occurrence distribution within protected areas. We also calculated the percentage of caves within the range of the species in habitat remnants for the entire country and for the north-eastern region, and the percentage of caves potentially under pressure from mining activities (DNPM, 2015) and wind farms (ANEEL, 2015).

Results

Known and new records

Our literature survey yielded 81 records of N. macrourus in Brazil (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table S1). We added new records for the north-eastern state of Pernambuco, obtained from captures made during a bat inventory in the cave Meu Rei in Catimbau National Park (62,292 ha), which is located within the Caatinga biome (ICMBio, 2015). The cave is within a sandstone formation, with a horizontal length of 162 m (Azevedo & Bernard, Reference Azevedo and Bernard2015). It harbours a bat community that includes at least seven other species of two families (Phyllostomidae: Diphylla ecaudata, Carollia perspicillata, Glossophaga soricina, Anoura geoffroyi, Lonchorhina aurita, Tonatia bidens; and Mormoopidae: Pteronotus gymnonotus), which at certain times can surpass 120,000 individuals, most of them P. gymnonotus. Measurements in two chambers of the cave, one in its central part and the other in a deeper part, yielded mean temperatures of 25 and 28°C, and relative humidity of 80 and 87%, respectively. The cave is a high priority for full protection (Azevedo & Bernard, Reference Azevedo and Bernard2015).

Fig. 1 Spatial evolution of records of the Brazilian funnel-eared bat Natalus macrourus (Natalidae) from 1893 to 2015.

Using hand nets we captured eight N. macrourus (4 males and 4 females) in the cave Meu Rei. The captures were made in October and December 2014, and March, May, June, August and October 2015. Three of these individuals were collected; the others were not marked, so recaptures were possible. We weighed and measured each bat and estimated its age and reproductive status, but retained only the first individual as a voucher, which we deposited in the Mammal Collection of the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE 3317; ICMBio/MMA permit #43816-1; Ethics Committee on Animal Care—UFPE #23076.027916/2015-13). All the other bats were released at the site of capture. We recorded another individual of N. macrourus on 14 May 2015 during a visit to another cave 11 km away, outside the limits of Catimbau National Park.

The records from Pernambuco were added to the existing records of the species in Brazil for 1893–2015 (Fig. 2). Sixty percent of these records are from caves, grottos or within 5 km of known caves, and 70% are from within 10 km of known caves. Thirty percent of all records are from ecotones between savannah, steppic savanna, dry coastal vegetation (restinga), or croplands, 25% are from dense rainforests, and 20% are from savannahs. The records are broadly distributed and occupy four of the six Brazilian biomes (Fig. 1). Most records are from Atlantic Forest (40%), followed by Cerrado (23%), Amazonia (17%) and Caatinga (16%). In 2015 N. macrourus was included in the species list for the Pantanal, based on records in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul (Fischer et al., Reference Fischer, Santos, Carvalho, Camargo, Cunha and Silveira2015).

Fig. 2 Temporal evolution of the number of localities with known records of the Brazilian funnel-eared bat in Brazil from 1893 to 2015.

Potential distribution modelling

The potential distribution of N. macrourus modelled using bioclimatic variables combined with the potential occurrence of caves was 4,445,996 km2 (AUCtraining = 0.89 ± SD 0.01; AUCtest = 0.87 ± SD 0.05), which is 11.5% smaller than the potential distribution modelled using bioclimatic variables only, which was 5,024,815 km2 (AUCtraining = 0.86 ± SD 0.01; AUCtest = 0.85 ± SD 0.04). However, considering the potential distribution based on both bioclimatic variables and the potential occurrence of caves there was a reduction of 26% in the areas of highest environmental suitability (> 75%) for the species when compared with the model based on bioclimatic variables only. Our model suggests that N. macrourus is positively associated with areas where there is a high potential occurrence of caves, and negatively associated with areas with high variation in mean daily temperature and mean annual rainfall.

The areas of highest environmental suitability for N. macrourus corresponded to only 3% of the total area of potential distribution, and these areas were within the Caatinga and Atlantic Forest biomes, mostly in the north-eastern region. That region alone comprised 67% of the total area of highest environmental suitability in the model that included the potential occurrence of caves, and 92% in the model with bioclimatic variables alone (Fig. 3). In the Atlantic Forest, the areas of highest environmental suitability were located in Sergipe, Alagoas, eastern Bahia, and mid-eastern Pernambuco and Paraíba states. Additionally, the areas of high environmental suitability (50–75%) accounted for < 20% of the total area modelled, and were located mostly in the Atlantic Forest of north-eastern Brazil (55% in the model including the potential cave occurrence variable; 46% without). Areas of low environmental suitability (18–25%) were found in north-western Bahia, southern Piauí and eastern Amazonas (to the south of the Amazon River) states, as well as in mid-northern Mato Grosso, Tocantins and Paraná states.

Conservation scenarios for the species

Based on the model of potential distribution of the species, considering the importance of caves for N. macrourus and considering the area where original vegetation cover was already lost, we estimate that the species has already lost 54% of its habitat in Brazil and that there are < 35% of habitat remnants in areas with the highest environmental suitability (Fig. 3). We estimate that 53% of the caves recorded within the distribution of N. macrourus are in habitat remnants and c. 54% are < 5 km from mining operations. Furthermore, 2% of these caves are < 10 km from wind farms, and only 4% of the potential distribution of N. macrourus is located within fully protected areas.

Fig. 3 Potential distribution of the funnel-eared bat N. macrourus in north-eastern Brazil, modelled considering only bioclimatic variables (a), and with the addition of cave occurrence potential (b). White circles represent known records for the species, and white triangles represent new records for the state of Pernambuco.

Approximately 30% of the area of potential distribution of N. macrourus is located in north-eastern Brazil, where 44% of the caves are in human-modified areas. We estimate that N. macrourus has already lost 50% of its natural habitat in north-eastern Brazil, and up to 65% in areas of highest environmental suitability in the eastern part of the region, where human population growth is higher. In that region only 2% of the potential distribution of N. macrourus is located within fully protected areas.

Discussion

The records of N. macrourus indicate a broad distribution in Brazil, with the species occurring from xeric (e.g. the Caatinga, with annual rainfall < 800 mm) to moist habitats (e.g. the Amazon, with annual rainfall > 2,000 mm; Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011). However, although our model suggests a large potential distribution, most of the records in Brazil are from areas of open vegetation, and our models suggest a preference for areas with low mean annual rainfall, lower variation in daily temperature, and high cave occurrence potential. These preferences may significantly restrict the effective area of occurrence of N. macrourus. We observed that only 3% of the total area of potential distribution has high environmental suitability for the species, and is located in the Caatinga and Atlantic Forest, mostly in north-eastern Brazil.

Brazil may have > 310,000 caves (Piló & Auler, Reference Piló and Auler2011) but < 5% of them have been officially recorded (ICMBio/CECAV, 2016). Species of the genus Natalus are considered to be dependent on caves for roosting (Taddei & Uieda, Reference Taddei and Uieda2001; Tejedor et al., Reference Tejedor, Silva-Taboada and Rodríguez-Hernández2004; Tejedor & Davalos, Reference Tejedor and Davalos2016), and our analysis confirms this strong association. This finding is a cause for concern, as changes in the Brazilian cave protection law have increased the vulnerability of cave environments and may result in a poor outlook for the conservation of cave-dependent species. Until 2008, Brazilian caves were fully protected. However, the law was changed by Presidential Decree no. 6,640, which determined that caves should be categorized according to their relevance, and only those categorized as being of ‘maximum relevance’ would be fully protected (Brasil, 2008). The prior categorization of all the Brazilian caves as a prerogative for their protection is infeasible and, in practice, the change in the law has reduced their protection, as caves in the categories of high, medium and low relevance may be legally exploited and destroyed. Decree no. 6,640 is therefore considered to be a serious threat to the conservation of Brazilian bats (Bernard et al., Reference Bernard, Aguiar, Brito, Cruz-Neto, Gregorin, Machado, Freitas and Vieira2012). Cave protection is highlighted as being a priority for bat conservation  (e.g. Fenton, Reference Fenton1997; Luo et al., Reference Luo, Jiang, Lu, Wang, Wang and Feng2013; Furey & Racey, Reference Furey, Racey, Voigt and Kingston2016) and an increase in the number of formally protected roosts is needed urgently in Brazil, given the pressure on cave environments there (e.g. Ribeiro, Reference Ribeiro2015).

As well as depending on caves for shelter, Natalus bats, which are strictly insectivorous, also depend on having tracts of habitat of sufficient environmental quality available for foraging. Therefore, N. macrourus may face other pressures in addition to roost loss. Our results suggest that c. 54% of the known caves within the potential distribution of N. macrourus are < 5 km from mining areas. Besides the direct loss of shelters caused by the exploration of caves for mining, explosives frequently used in that process, the presence of people, and the noise caused by machinery can affect bats using these shelters (Furey & Racey, Reference Furey, Racey, Voigt and Kingston2016). Furthermore, 2% of these caves are < 10 km from wind farms, which are another threat to bats (Barclay et al., Reference Barclay, Baerwald and Gruver2007; Arnett et al., Reference Arnett, Brown, Erickson, Fiedler, Hamilton and Henry2008). The catchment areas of wind farms in the Neotropics are largely unknown but studies in Europe and Canada have found that wind turbines influence not only bat populations in close proximity but also those at distances of several hundreds of kilometers or even > 1,000 km (Voigt et al., Reference Voigt, Popa-Lisseanu, Niermann and Kramer-Schadt2012; Baerwald et al., Reference Baerwald, Patterson and Barclay2014). We recommend that caves with confirmed occurrence of N. macrourus close to mines or wind farms should be protected and monitored in the medium and long term.

The conservation outlook for N. macrourus would be more positive if there were a larger number of protected areas within its distribution. However, only 4% of the potential distribution of N. macrourus is located within fully protected areas. In the north-eastern region, which has the greatest potential occurrence of N. macrourus, the percentage is even lower (2%). Hence, a scenario in which low roost protection is combined with other threats, such as mining and habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation, could extitrpate some populations locally (Tejedor, Reference Tejedor2011).

Natalus spp. are frequently associated with several other bat species (Ruschi, Reference Ruschi1951; Trajano & Moreira, Reference Trajano and Moreira1991; Trajano & Gimenez, Reference Trajano and Gimenez1998; Gregorin & Mendes, Reference Gregorin and Mendes1999; Taddei & Uieda, Reference Taddei and Uieda2001). We observed N. macrourus roosting with A. geoffroyi, C. perspicillata, D. ecaudata, G. soricina, L. aurita, P. gymnonotus and T. bidens; L. aurita is also categorized as Vulnerable in Brazil. Hence, protecting the caves used by N. macrourus could also conserve other species of bats as well as the rich, highly specialized and frequently endemic cave biota (Furey & Racey, Reference Furey, Racey, Voigt and Kingston2016).

Robust databases of species records are necessary for improving potential distribution models in large and under-sampled countries, such as Brazil (e.g. Oliveira et al., Reference Oliveira, Paglia, Brescovit, de Carvalho, Silva and Rezende2016), which would, in turn, highlight priority areas for inventories and conservation (Costa et al., Reference Costa, Nogueira, Machado and Colli2010; Moreira et al., Reference Moreira, Leite, Siqueira, Coutinho, Zanon and Mendes2014; Ingberman et al., Reference Ingberman, Fusco-Costa and Monteiro-Filho2016). However, species distribution models are influenced by many factors, such as spatial resolution, environmental variables and the quality of distribution records. The addition of new records can produce distinct modelling outputs, and models based on partial datasets for species occurrence can lead conservationists or decision makers to incorrect conclusions (Aguiar et al., Reference Aguiar, Bernard, Ribeiro, Machado and Jones2016).

There are no formal records of bats for almost 60% of Brazil (Bernard et al., Reference Bernard, Aguiar and Machado2011) and there is limited knowledge of the distribution of several bat species in the country. New records, such as those reported here from Pernambuco, help to reduce these gaps for poorly known, hard to capture species, such as Natalus spp. The previous records closest to Pernambuco were from Ceará, Sergipe and Paraíba states, >235 km from our study area (Taddei & Uieda, Reference Taddei and Uieda2001; Rocha et al., Reference Rocha, Mikalauskas, Bocchiglieri, Feijó and Ferrari2013). Moreover, nearly half of the 81 records of occurrence of N. macrourus in Brazil have been gathered since 2000 (Fig. 1; Leal et al., Reference Leal, Ramalho, Miller, Filho, Neto and Nova2012), indicating that recent efforts have resulted in a significant refinement of the species’ distribution. Considering the high potential occurrence of caves in north-eastern Brazil (Jansen et al., Reference Jansen, Cavalcanti and Lamblém2012), and considering that at least three (N. macrourus, L. aurita and Furipterus horrens) of the six threatened bat species in Brazil are frequent or exclusive cave users, caves in north-eastern Brazil are a priority for bat inventories so that roosts used by Natalus or any other threatened bat species can be identified and proposed for full protection.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ana Claudia Jardelino, Evelyn Figueiredo, Frederico Hintze, Jaire Torres and Ítalo Azevedo for their help with field work, and Project Ecológico de Longa Duração Sítio Parque Nacional do Catimbau for logistical support. We thank Valéria Tavares for sharing information on records of N. macrourus. Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior granted scholarships to M. Delgado-Jaramillo and E. Barbier, and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico granted a fellowship to E. Bernard. The study was funded by Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza (process #0983-20132). We thank Departamento de Zoologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco for supporting our studies on bats in Brazil. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author contributions

M. Delgado-Jaramillo collected data and conducted the analysis. E. Barbier collected data. E. Bernard conceived the research. All authors contributed to writing the article.

Biographical sketches

Mariana Delgado-Jaramillo is interested in how species distribution modelling can be applied to conservation, and her work has focused on bats. Eder Barbier’s research interests include the biology, ecology and geographical distribution of hosts and parasites. Enrico Bernard’s research is focused on the ecology and conservation of Brazilian biodiversity, with an emphasis on bats.

Footnotes

*

Also at: Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316001186

References

Aguiar, L.M.S., Bernard, E., Ribeiro, V., Machado, R. B. & Jones, G. (2016) Should I stay or should I go? Climate change effects on the future of Neotropical savannah bats. Global Ecology and Conservation, 5, 2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANEEL (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica) (2015) Http://sigel.aneel.gov.br/portal/home/index.html [accessed 13 December 2016].Google Scholar
Arita, H.T. (1996) The conservation of cave-roosting bats in Yucatan, Mexico. Biological Conservation, 76, 177185.Google Scholar
Arnett, E.B., Brown, W.K., Erickson, W.P., Fiedler, J.K., Hamilton, B.L., Henry, T.H. et al. (2008) Patterns of bat fatalities at wind energy facilities in North America. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 72, 6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azevedo, I.S. & Bernard, E. (2015) Avaliação do nível de relevância e estado de conservação da caverna “Meu Rei” no PARNA Catimbau, Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Espeleologia, 1, 123.Google Scholar
Baerwald, E.F., Patterson, W.P. & Barclay, R.M.R. (2014) Origins and migratory patterns of bats killed by wind turbines in southern Alberta: evidence from stable isotopes. Ecosphere, 5, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, R.M.R., Baerwald, E.F. & Gruver, J.C. (2007) Variation in bat and bird fatalities at wind energy facilities: assessing the effects of rotor size and tower height. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 85, 381387.Google Scholar
Bernard, E., Aguiar, L.M.S., Brito, D., Cruz-Neto, A.P., Gregorin, R., Machado, R.B. et al. (2012) Uma análise de horizontes sobre a conservação de morcegos no Brasil. In Mamíferos do Brasil: genética, sistemática, ecologia e conservação, Volume II (eds Freitas, T.R.O. & Vieira, E.M.), pp. 1935. Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
Bernard, E., Aguiar, L.M.S. & Machado, R.B. (2011) Discovering the Brazilian bat fauna: a task for two centuries? Mammal Review, 41, 2339.Google Scholar
Bordignon, M.O. (2006) Diversidade de morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) do Complexo Aporé-Sucuriú, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 23, 10021009.Google Scholar
Boria, R.A., Olson, L.E., Goodman, S.M. & Anderson, R.P. (2014) Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecological Modelling, 275, 7377.Google Scholar
Brasil (2008) Decreto n° 6.640, de 7 de novembro de 2008. Http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2007-2010/2008/Decreto/D6640.htm [accessed 26 April 2015].Google Scholar
Cardillo, M., Mace, G.M., Jones, K.E., Bielby, J., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Sechrest, W. et al. (2005) Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science, 309, 12391241.Google Scholar
CECAV (Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação de Cavernas) (2015) Http://www.icmbio.gov.br/cecav/projetos-e-atividades/potencialidade-de-ocorrencia-de-cavernas.html [accessed 26 April 2015].Google Scholar
Costa, G.C., Nogueira, C., Machado, R.B. & Colli, G.R. (2010) Sampling bias and the use of ecological niche modeling in conservation planning: a field evaluation in a biodiversity hotspot. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 883899.Google Scholar
Cunha, N.L., Fischer, E. & Santos, C.F. (2011) Bat assemblage in savanna remnants of Sonora, central-western Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 11, 197201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, A.D., Hamilton, M.J., Boyer, A.G., Brown, J.H. & Ceballos, G. (2009) Multiple ecological pathways to extinction in mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1070210705.Google Scholar
DNPM (Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral) (2015) SIGMINE. Http://www.dnpm.gov.br/assuntos/ao-minerador/sigmine [accessed 13 December 2016].Google Scholar
Esberard, C.E.L., Baptista, M., Costa, L.M., Luz, J.L. & Lourenço, E.C. (2010) Morcegos de Paraiso de Tobias, Miracema, Rio de Janeiro. Biota Neotropica, 10, 249256.Google Scholar
Esberard, C.E.L., Motta, J.A. & Perigo, C. (2005) Morcegos cavernícolas da Área de Proteção Ambiental (APA) Nascentes do Rio Vermelho, Goiás. Revista Brasileira Zoociências, 7, 311325.Google Scholar
Faria, D., Soares-Santos, B. & Sampaio, E. (2006) Bats from the Atlantic rainforest of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 6, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feijó, J.A. & Langguth, A. (2011) Lista de Quirópteros da Paraíba, Brasil com 25 novos registros. Chiroptera Neotropical, 17, 10551062.Google Scholar
Fenton, M.B. (1997) Science and the conservation of bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 78, 114.Google Scholar
Fischer, E., Santos, C.F., Carvalho, L.F.A.C., Camargo, G., Cunha, N.L., Silveira, M. et al. (2015) Bat fauna of Mato Grosso do Sul, southwestern Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 15, 117.Google Scholar
Furey, N.M. & Racey, P.A. (2016) Conservation ecology of cave bats. In Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World (eds Voigt, C.C. & Kingston, T.), pp. 463500. Springer, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Garbino, G.S.T. & Tejedor, A. (2012) Natalus macrourus (Gervais, 1856) (Chiroptera: Natalidae) is a senior synonym of Natalus espiritosantensis (Ruschi, 1951). Mammalia, 77, 237240.Google Scholar
Gardner, A.L. (2008) Family Natalidae. In Mammals of South America: Marsupials, Xenarthrans, Shrews, and Bats, Volume I (ed. Gardner, A.L.), pp. 397399. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) (2015) Http://www.gbif.org/ [accessed 16 April 2015].Google Scholar
Glover, A.M. & Altringham, J.D. (2008) Cave selection and use by swarming bat species. Biological Conservation, 141, 14931504.Google Scholar
Goodman, S.M., Andriafidison, D., Andrianaivoarivelo, R., Cardiff, S.G., Ifticene, E., Jenkins, R.K.B. et al. (2005) The distribution and conservation of bats in the dry regions of Madagascar. Animal Conservation, 8, 153165.Google Scholar
Google Scholar (2015) Https://scholar.google.com.br [accessed 26 April 2015].Google Scholar
Gregorin, R. & Mendes, L.F. (1999) Sobre quirópteros (Emballonuridae, Phyllostomidae, Natalidae) de duas cavernas da Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brasil. Iheringia Série Zoológica, 86, 121124.Google Scholar
ICMBio (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade)/CECAV (Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação de Cavernas (2016) Cadastro Nacional de Informações Espeleológicas – CANIE. Http://www.icmbio.gov.br/cecav/canie.html [accessed 30 September 2016].Google Scholar
Ingberman, B., Fusco-Costa, R. & Monteiro-Filho, E.L.A. (2016) A current perspective on the historical geographic distribution of the endangered muriquis (Brachyteles spp.): implications for conservation. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0150906.Google Scholar
Jansen, D.C., Cavalcanti, L.F. & Lamblém, H.S. (2012) Mapa de potencialidade de ocorrência de cavernas no Brasil, na escala 1:2.500.000. Revista Brasileira de Espeleologia, 2, 4257.Google Scholar
Jones, K.E., Purvis, A. & Gittleman, J.L. (2003) Biological correlates of extinction risk in bats. The American Naturalist, 161, 601614.Google Scholar
Kingston, T. (2010) Research priorities for bat conservation in Southeast Asia: a consensus approach. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 471484.Google Scholar
Leal, E.S.B., Ramalho, D.F., Miller, B.G., Filho, P.B.P., Neto, J.G.P., Nova, F.V.P.V. et al. (2012) Primeiro registro da família Natalidae (Mammalia: Chiroptera) para a Caatinga do estado da Paraíba, Nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira Zoociências, 14, 243253.Google Scholar
Luo, J., Jiang, T., Lu, G., Wang, L., Wang, J. & Feng, J. (2013) Bat conservation in China: should protection of subterranean habitats be a priority? Oryx, 47, 526531.Google Scholar
Mares, M.A., Willig, M.R., Streilein, K.E. & Lacher, T.E. (1981) The mammals of northeastern Brazil: a preliminary assessment. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 50, 81137.Google Scholar
MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente) (2014) —Portaria n° 444 de dezembro de 2014. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente) (2016) Http://mapas.mma.gov.br/i3geo/datadownload.htm [accessed 26 April 2015].Google Scholar
Mok, W.Y., Wilson, D.E., Lacey, L.A. & Luizão, R.C.C. (1982) Lista atualizada da quirópteros da Amazônia Brasileira. Acta Amazonica, 12, 817823.Google Scholar
Moreira, D.O., Leite, G.R., Siqueira, M.F., Coutinho, B.R., Zanon, M.S. & Mendes, S.L. (2014) The distributional ecology of the maned sloth: environmental influences on its distribution and gaps in knowledge. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e110929.Google Scholar
Morgan, G.S. & Czaplewski, N.J. (2003) A new bat (Chiroptera: Natalidae) from the early Miocene of Florida, with comments on natalid phylogeny. Journal of Mammalogy, 84, 729752.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueira, M.R., Lima, I.P., Moratelli, R., Tavares, V.C., Gregorin, R. & Peracchi, A.L. (2014) Checklist of Brazilian bats, with comments on original records. Check List, 10, 808821.Google Scholar
Oliveira, U., Paglia, A.P., Brescovit, A.D., de Carvalho, C.J.B., Silva, D.P., Rezende, D.T. et al. (2016) The strong influence of collection bias on biodiversity knowledge shortfalls of Brazilian terrestrial biodiversity. Diversity and Distributions, 22, 12321244.Google Scholar
Pearson, R.G., Raxworthy, C.J., Nakamura, M. & Peterson, A.T. (2007) Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 102117.Google Scholar
Peterson, A.T., Soberón, J., Pearson, R.G., Anderson, R.P., Martínez-Meyer, E., Nakamura, M. & Araújo, M.B. (2011) Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.Google Scholar
Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P. & Schapire, R.E. (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190, 231259.Google Scholar
Phillips, S.J. & Dudík, M. (2008) Modeling of species distributions with MaxEnt: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31, 161175.Google Scholar
Piló, L.B. & Auler, A. (2011) Introdução à Espeleologia. In III Curso de Espeleologia e Licenciamento Ambiental, pp. 723. ICMBio/CECAV, Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Radosavljevic, A. & Anderson, R.P. (2014) Making better Maxent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation. Journal of Biogeography, 41, 629643.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, A.A. (2015) Ameaças à conservação do patrimônio espeleológico em litologias ferríferas. Revista Brasileira de Espeleologia, 1, 2438.Google Scholar
Rocha, P.A., Mikalauskas, J.S., Bocchiglieri, A., Feijó, J.A. & Ferrari, S.F. (2013) An update on the distribution of the Brazilian funnel-eared bat, Natalus macrourus (Gervais, 1856) (Mammalia, Chiroptera), with new records from the Brazilian Northeastern. Check List, 9, 675679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruschi, A. (1951) Morcegos do estado do Espirito Santo. Família Vespertilionidae, chave analítica para os gêneros e espécies representadas no E. Santo. Descrição de Myotis nigricans nigricans e Myotis espiritosantensis n. sp. e algumas observações a seu respeito. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Profesor Mello Leitão, 4, 111.Google Scholar
Sbragia, I.A. & Cardoso, A. (2008) Quirópterofauna (Mammalia: Chiroptera) cavernícola da Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brasil. Chiroptera Neotropical, 14, 360365.Google Scholar
SISCOM (2015) Http://siscom.ibama.gov.br/monitorabiomas [accessed 26 April 2015].Google Scholar
SpeciesLink (2015) Http://www.splink.org.br [accessed 26 April 2015].Google Scholar
Taddei, V.A. & Uieda, W. (2001) Distribution and morphometrics of Natalus stramineus from South America (Chiroptera, Natalidae). Iheringia Série Zoologica, 91, 123132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejedor, A. (2011) Systematics of Funnel-Eared Bats (Chiroptera: Natalidae). American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Tejedor, A. & Davalos, L. (2016) Natalus espiritosantensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T136448A21983924. Http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/136448/0 [accessed 1 December 2016].Google Scholar
Tejedor, A., Silva-Taboada, G. & Rodríguez-Hernández, D. (2004) Discovery of extant Natalus major (Chiroptera: Natalidae) in Cuba. Mammalian Biology, 69, 153162.Google Scholar
Trajano, E. (1982) New records of bats from southeastern Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy, 63, 529.Google Scholar
Trajano, E. & Gimenez, E.A. (1998) Bat community in a cave from eastern Brazil, including a new record of Lionycteris (Phyllostomidae, Glossophaginae). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 33, 6975.Google Scholar
Trajano, E. & Moreira, J.R.A. (1991) Estudo da fauna de cavernas da Província Espeleológica Arenítica Altamira-Itaituba, Pará. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 51, 1329.Google Scholar
VertNet (2015) Http://www.vertnet.org [accessed 26 April 2015].Google Scholar
Voigt, C.C., Popa-Lisseanu, A.G., Niermann, I. & Kramer-Schadt, S. (2012) The catchment area of wind farms for European bats: a plea for international regulations. Biological Conservation, 153, 8086.Google Scholar
Web of Science (2015) Http://www.webofknowledge.com [accessed 26 April 2015].Google Scholar
Willig, M.R. (1983) Composition, Microgeographic Variation, and Sexual Dimorphism in Caatingas and Cerrado Bat Communities from Northeast Brazil. Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, USA.Google Scholar
Winge, H. (1893) Jordfundne og nulevende Flager-mus (Chiroptera) fra Lagoa Santa, Minas Gerais, Brasilien. Med udsigt over Flagermusenes un-dbyrdes Slaegstkab. E Museo Lundii, 2, 192.Google Scholar
WorldClim (2015) Http://www.worldclim.org/ [accessed 26 April 2015].Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Spatial evolution of records of the Brazilian funnel-eared bat Natalus macrourus (Natalidae) from 1893 to 2015.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Temporal evolution of the number of localities with known records of the Brazilian funnel-eared bat in Brazil from 1893 to 2015.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Potential distribution of the funnel-eared bat N. macrourus in north-eastern Brazil, modelled considering only bioclimatic variables (a), and with the addition of cave occurrence potential (b). White circles represent known records for the species, and white triangles represent new records for the state of Pernambuco.

Supplementary material: PDF

Delgado-Jaramillo supplementary material

Table S1

Download Delgado-Jaramillo supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 104.7 KB