Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:01:39.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nepal's conservation policy options for commercial medicinal plant harvesting: stakeholder views

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2005

Helle Overgaard Larsen
Affiliation:
Present address: Danish Centre for Forestry, Landscape and Planning, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark ComForM project, Institute of Forestry, Pokhara, P.O. Box 203, Nepal
Patrick Delinde Smith
Affiliation:
USAID Biodiversity Team, United States International Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA
Carsten Smith Olsen
Affiliation:
Danish Centre for Forestry, Landscape and Planning, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is a huge annual trade in Himalayan medicinal plants but only limited information on their sustainable use and conservation. The aim of this paper is to investigate if sustainable commercial medicinal plant management is promoted by forest policy formation and implementation in Nepal. Data was obtained through 175 semi-structured interviews with persons from five stakeholder groups involved in commercial alpine medicinal plant exploitation and conservation in Nepal: harvesters, traders, District Forest Office staff, staff at departments and ministerial level of the Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, and international and local NGOs and donors. The emphasis was on recording respondents' views on the official mechanisms regulating harvest of alpine commercial medicinal plants. It was found that current approaches to non-timber forest policy formation and implementation need to be revised if objectives of conservation and sustainable management are to be achieved. Identified problems include exclusion of harvesters from the policy formation process and widespread agreement among respondents that current collection permits and bans do not strongly affect resource utilization.

Type
Articles
Copyright
2005 Fauna & Flora International

Footnotes

This paper contains supplementary material that can only be found online at http://journals.cambridge.org
Supplementary material: PDF

Larsen Supplementary material

Appendix.pdf

Download Larsen Supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 28.7 KB