Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:50:52.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monte Pascoal—indigenous rights and conservation in conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Kent H. Redford
Kent H. Redford
Affiliation:
Center for Latin American Studies and Department of Wildlife and Range Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla. 32611, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Monte Pascoal National Park contains an important remnant of Brazil's threatened Atlantic forest. It may not survive for much longer, however, because the park's fate is in the hands of two government agencies with conflicting objectives—one concerned with conserving species in the parks and the other concerned with the rights of indigenous people to those resources. Although the Pataxo Indians lived in these forests in the past without destroying their resource base, modern pressures have altered their ability to do so. If nothing is done, the forest as a home for threatened plants and animals and as a source of resources for people, will be lost.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 33 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1989

References

Agostinho, P. 1980. Bases para o estabelecimento da reserva Pataxo. Rev. Antropohgia (Sao Paulo), 23, 19–29.Google Scholar
Azevedo, D. 1987. Monte Pascoal. A descoberta da terra virgem. Revista Geografica Universal, 151, 50–59.Google Scholar
Brownrigg, L.A. 1985. Native cultures and protected areas: Management options. In Culture and Conservation: The Human Dimension in Environmental Planning (eds McNeely, J.A. and Pitt, D.), pp. 33–44. Croom Helm, Dover, New Hampshire.Google Scholar
Caminha, P.V. 1967. Letter of Pedro Vaz de Caminha to King Manuel. In The Voyage of Pedro Alvares Cabral to Brazil and India from Contemporary Documents and Narratives. Hakluyt Society 1938, republished Kraus Reprint Ltd. Nendeln, Lichtenstein.Google Scholar
Centro Ecumenico de Documentacao e Informacao (CEDI). 1982. Povos Indigenas no Brasil. Aconteceu (Rio de Janeiro) 12.Google Scholar
Centro Ecumenico de Documentacao e Informacao (CEDI). 1983. Povos Indigenas no Brasil. Aconteceu (Rio de Janeiro) 14.Google Scholar
Centro Ecumenico de Documentacao e Informacao (CEDI). 1984. Povos Indigenas no Brasil. Aconteceu (Rio de Janeiro) 15.Google Scholar
Centro Ecumenico de Documentacao e Informacao (CEDI). 1986. Povos Indigenas no Brasil. Aconteceu (Rio de Janeiro) 15.Google Scholar
Fonseca, G.A.B. 1985. The Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biol. Conserv., 34, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemming, J. 1987. Amazon Frontier. The Defeat of the Brazilian Indians. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma.Google Scholar
Noticias Populares. 1983. Na reserva dos Pataxo, a fome. Noticias Populares, Sao Paulo 12 12, 1983.Google Scholar
Liberal, O.. 1987. Pataxos desmataram toda a floresta de sua reserva. O Liberal 1 09, 1987.Google Scholar
Padua, M.T.J. 1983. Os Parques Nacionais e Reservas Biological do Brasil. I.B.D.F., Brasilia.Google Scholar
Redford, K.H. and Robinson, J.G. 1985. Hunting by indigenous peoples and the conservation of their game species. Cultural Survival, 9, 41–44.Google Scholar
Seeger, A. 1982. Native Americans and the conservation of flora and fauna in Brazil. In Socio-economic Effects and Constraints in Tropical Forest Management (ed. Hallsworth, E.G.), pp. 177–190. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar