Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:14:15.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The huemul in Chile: national symbol in jeopardy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Anthony Povilitis
Anthony Povilitis
Affiliation:
725 35th Street, Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The huemul has vanished from much of its historic range in Chile and Argentina; now perhaps only 1300 are left. Since 1976, wildlife guards have been protecting huemuls in some parts of Chile and in 1977 a huemul guard station was built at the Rio Claro with ffPS support. In 1980–81 the author censused the known huemul populations in Chile and reports on their present status, evaluates the conservation measures that are being taken and recommends further action needed to save them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 34 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1983

References

References and further reading

Astorga, R. 1980. Revista del Domingo. Santiago, 7 09.Google Scholar
Cabrera, A.L. and Yepes, J. 1960. Mamíferos Sud-Americanos. Edian, S.A. Editores, Buenos Aires. 160 pp.Google Scholar
Colomés, A. 1978. Biología y ecología del huemul Chileno. Estudio de sus hábitos alimentos. Thesis. Univ. de Chile. Santiago.Google Scholar
Conaf 1980. Proposicíon para establecer un sistema national de areas silvestres protegidas en Chile. Dept Conservación, Santiago. 29 pp.Google Scholar
Gigoux, E.E. 1929. El huemul. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 23, 573–582.Google Scholar
Hernandez, M. and Rosas, H. 1979. Aisen, paraiso del huemul. Trapanada Aœno 1, Numero 2, 2–10.Google Scholar
Housse, R.P. 1953. Animates salvajes de Chile en su clasificación moderna. Univ. de Chile, Santiago. 189 pp.Google Scholar
IUCN 1982. South Andean huemul. In: Mammal Red Data Book, Part I, 477–481 (Eds Thomback, J. and Jenkins, M.). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Mistral, G. 1926. Menos cóndor y más huemul. (Reprint edition in Elogio de las cosas de la tierra, pp. 122–123. Editorial Andes Bello, Santiago, 1979.)Google Scholar
Oryx 1977. 14, 2, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povilitis, A. 1978a. The Chilean huemul project—a case history (1975–6). In: Threatened Deer, pp. 109–128. Alden Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Povilitis, A. 1978b. The Chilean huemul project (1975–76): huemul ecology and conservation. Report to CONAF. PhD dissertation (1979). Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins. 178 pp.Google Scholar
Povilitis, A. 1983. Social organisation and mating strategy of the huemel (Hippocamelus bisulcus). J. Mamm. 64 (1), 156–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prichard, H.H. 1902. Field notes upon some of the larger mammals of Patagonia. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 272–277.Google Scholar