Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:21:08.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First village successfully resettled from Dandeli-Anshi Tiger Reserve

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2014

P.M. Muthanna
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, India Program, Bangalore, India
Divya Vasudev*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, India Program, Bangalore, India
M.C. Vinay Kumar
Affiliation:
Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Conservation news
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2014 

Much debate on the conservation of species such as the tiger has centred around the need for inviolate spaces devoid of human presence. A conservation strategy that emerges from this is the resettlement of villages from within the core zones of tiger conservation areas. The resettlement of such villages not only frees up space for dedicated tiger conservation but provides the resettled people with better access to amenities and serves to mitigate human–wildlife conflict (Karanth, 2007, Biological Conservation, 139, 315–324). Although voluntary resettlement is sanctioned within demarcated Tiger Reserves in India, actual implementation is often delayed for various reasons. The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) India Program and its partners, with help from WCS, New York, have participated in encouraging the implementation of relocation activities in Dandeli-Anshi Tiger Reserve, in the state of Karnataka, south-west India. Since its demarcation as a Tiger Reserve in 2007, > 600 families resident within the reserve have expressed interest in resettlement. However, various hurdles have prevented the Government of Karnataka from facilitating this.

WCS India has catalysed and provided strategic support for the implementation of the relocation programme, focusing on a remote settlement, Naiphed, within the Reserve. These efforts culminated in May 2014, with the village now relocated outside the protected area. The relocation followed models developed through previous involvement of WCS India in the resettlement of c. 1,000 families elsewhere in the Malenad–Mysore landscape, which spans the states of Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu. Naiphed comprised three families and was formerly located c. 10 km from amenities such as public transport, medical facilities and schools, and was without electricity. The village suffered repeated incidents of crop raiding by recovering wildlife populations, and the infertile land produced only low yields of rice and Areca catechu. The resettled families now have access to fertile agricultural land and amenities. Following the norms laid down by the Government of Karnataka, WCS provided each family with appropriate financial compensation to facilitate adaptation to their new home.

As a result of the resettlement all land formerly occupied by the village has been relinquished to the Government of Karnataka. Regeneration of native vegetation will follow, turning the abandoned village into habitat for tigers, their prey and other fauna. The Malenad–Mysore Tiger Landscape, which comprises multiple protected areas, is one of the most promising conservation landscapes for the long-term conservation of the tiger. Included in this landscape is the Nagarahole–Bandipur complex of contiguous forests, which has a tiger density of 10–15 individuals per 100 km2.

Following the successful resettlement of the families from Naiphed, the government has initiated resettlement of an additional 30 families from within the Reserve. Preliminary procedures have been initiated, with some financial compensation provided to the families while subsequent steps are undertaken for fair resettlement. It is expected that the remaining families that have expressed interest in being resettled will soon follow. Resettlement programmes, when conducted in a manner that benefits villagers otherwise separated from essential services, can serve as a valuable conservation tool to hasten recovery of threatened species, alleviate threats to biodiversity and foster a positive attitude towards wildlife conservation through human–wildlife conflict mitigation.