Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:34:30.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conflict between people and protected areas within the Bénoué Wildlife Conservation Area, North Cameroon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2003

Robert B. Weladji
Affiliation:
NORAGRIC Present address: Department of Animal Science, PO Box 5025, N-1432, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås, Norway. E-mail: [email protected]
Martin N. Tchamba
Affiliation:
WWF – Cameroon Programme Office, PO Box 6776, Yaoundé, Cameroon
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Knowledge of conflicts between people and protected areas is required for the design of sustainable conservation strategies for the management of most protected areas. This study identifies the causes of conflicts between local people and the Bénoué Wildlife Conservation Area (BWCA), which includes the Bénoué National Park, in northern Cameroon. Informal interviews and questionnaires were administered to 114 households in three communities, and to 17 Park staff and seven professional hunting guides. Crop damage affected 86% of the surveyed households, with 31% of crop income lost on average, and with the damage varying significantly between communities. Elephants, baboons, patas monkeys, warthogs and green parrots accounted for 97% of crop damage, with the staple foods maize and millet being most affected. Of the respondents, 28% experienced livestock depredation, with 18% of livestock income lost on average. The civet cat was the main predator. The involvement of local people in illegal activities, their lack of access to natural resources, and damage by wildlife were identified as principal causes of conflicts. Local people, park staff and professional hunting guides had diverse and differing perceptions about the causes of the conflicts, and made various suggestions for reduction of wildlife damage including animal scaring and controlled shooting. We conclude that, under current wildlife policy, conflict between people and BWCA is difficult to resolve. To reduce conflicts and promote sustainable conservation, we suggest co-management of wildlife involving all stakeholders, establishment of crop damage control teams, and promotion of tangible benefits to local people. There may be a requirement for site-specificity inmanagement strategies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
2003 Fauna & Flora International
Supplementary material: PDF

Weladji and Tchamba appendix

Supplementary appendix

Download Weladji and Tchamba appendix(PDF)
PDF 71.7 KB