Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:31:57.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community-based conservation and social change amongst South Indian honey-hunters: an anthropological perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Paul Nicholas Anderson
Paul Nicholas Anderson
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology and Resource Management, University of Edinburgh, Kings' Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JU, Scotland.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article reconsiders the use of financial incentives for securing the participation of ‘local’ people on conservation programmes by raising several less discussed social consequences which such incentives may entail. To this end, it outlines the involvement of a South Indian honey-hunting ‘tribe’ with an ecodevelopment programme and the market economy, noting how commercializing ‘traditional’ livelihoods may increase the general ‘standard of living’ but undermine the social ‘fabric’ of the community and aid in the rationalization of custom. It concludes by suggesting that social development should precede economic development for communities in transition between subsistence and commodity-orientated economic practices.

Keywords

Commodificationcommunity-basedconservationecodevelopmenthoney-huntingIndiasocial change
Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 2001 , pp. 81 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 2001

References

Anderson, P.N. (2000) Commodification, Conservation and Community: an Analysis and a Case Study in South India. Edinburgh Papers in South Asian Studies No. 14. Centre for South Asian Studies, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
Bird-David, N. (1989) An introduction to the Naikens: the people and the ethnographic myth. In Blue Mountains: the Ethnography and Biogeography of a South Indian Region (ed. Hockings, P.), pp. 249–280. Oxford University Press, Delhi.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979) Algeria 1960: the Disenchantment of the World, (translator Nice, R.) Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Colchester, M. (1994) Salvaging Nature: Indigenous Peoples, Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) discussion paper, Geneva.Google Scholar
Demmer, U. (1997) Voices in the forest: the field of gathering among the Jenu Kurumba. In Blue Mountains Revisited: the Ethnography and Biogeography of a South Indian Region (ed. Hockings, P.), pp. 164–191. Oxford University Press, Delhi.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Polity Press. London.Google Scholar
von Fürer-Haimendorf, C. (1985) Tribes of India: The Struggle for Survival. Oxford University Press, Delhi.Google Scholar
International Institute for Environment and Development (1994) Whose Eden? An Overview of Community Approaches to Wildlife Management. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.Google Scholar
Keystone, (1994) Honey Hunters and Beekeepers of Tamil Nadu. Keystone Foundation, Pondicherry, India.Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Mace, R. (1998) Conservation of Biological Resources. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, W. (1968) Cultural Contrasts and Similarities among Five Ethnic Groups in the Nilgiri District, Madras State, India 1800–1963. PhD Thesis. University of Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
Taussig, M. (1978) The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1991) The Ethics of Authenticity. Harvard University Press, London.Google Scholar
Wells, M. & Brandon, K. (1992) People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management with Local Communities. World Bank/WWF/USAID, Washington, DC.Google Scholar