Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:45:41.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards an Ethics of Creative Sound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2014

James Andean
James Andean*
Affiliation:
Centre for Music & Technology, Sibelius Academy, University of the Arts Helsinki, PL 30, 00097 Taideyliopisto, Helsinki, Finland
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines some of the ethical issues involved in working creatively with sound. Issues considered include: sound ownership; sound vs. vision as determinations of identity, and their relative iconicity; recorded sound; sound as physical phenomenon vs. sound as symbol; issues of copyright and trademark; community ownership; awareness, sensitivity and responsibility; composer responsibility vs. listener responsibility; the relative importance of contextualisation; and intercultural dialogue. We will conclude with a critique of the cultural and ethical shortcomings of the article itself, and a call for social, cultural and ethical engagement in creative sound work.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 19 , Special Issue 2: The Sound of Cultures , August 2014 , pp. 173 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. 1997. Aesthetic Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Andean, J. 2012. Cultural Relativism in Acousmatic Music. Musiikin Suunta 2: 26–31.Google Scholar
Atkinson, S. 2007. Interpretation and Musical Signification in Acousmatic Listening. Organised Sound 12(2): 113–122.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H.K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2010. Electroacoustic Music Incorporating Latin American Influences: A Consideration Of Implications, Reception And Borrowing. eContact! 12.4, http://cec.sonus.ca/econtact/12_4/blackburn_influences.html Google Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2011. Importing the Sonic Souvenir: Issues of Cross-Cultural Composition. Proceedings of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Conference, Sforzando! New York, June 2011.Google Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2013. Performer as Sound Source: Interactions and Mediations in the Recording Studio and in the Field. EMS13: Electroacoustic Music in the Context of Interactive Approaches and Networks, http://www.ems-network.org/ems13/EMS13Abstracts.html#B Google Scholar
Bugliosi, V., Gentry, C. 1974. Helter Skelter: The True Story of the Manson Murders. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ciardi, F.C. 2008. Local and Global Connotations in Sonic Composition. Organised Sound 13(2): 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipriani, A., Latini, G. 2008. Global/Local Issues in Electroacoustic Music for the Cinema of the Real: A Case Study. Organised Sound 13(2): 89–97.Google Scholar
Cusick, S. 2008. ‘You are in a place that is out of the world …’: Music in the Detention Camps of the ‘Global War on Terror’. Journal of the Society for American Music 2(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Daniel, E. 2007. Noise and Hearing Loss: A Review. The Journal of School Health 77: 225–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drever, J.L. 2002. Soundscape Composition: The Convergence of Ethnography and Acousmatic Music. Organised Sound 7(1): 21–27.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2000. Crossing Cultural Boundaries through Technology? In S. Emmerson (ed.), Music, Electronic Media and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Feld, S. 1988. Aesthetics as Iconicity of Style, or ‘Lift-Up-Over-Sounding’: Getting Into the Kaluli Groove. Yearbook for Traditional Music 20: 74–113.Google Scholar
Gluck, R. 2008. Between, Within and Across Cultures. Organised Sound 13(2): 141–152.Google Scholar
Goodman, S. 2010. Sonic Warfare: Sound, Affect, and the Ecology of Fear. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall, L. 2013. Electro-Instrumental Performance and Indonesian Musical Traditions: Moving Beyond Sonic Tourism. eContact! 15.2, http://cec.sonus.ca/econtact/15_2/hall_digitaltourism.html Google Scholar
Harris, B. 1996. Three Famous Notes of Broadcasting History: The NBC Chimes, http://www.radioremembered.org/chimes.htm Google Scholar
Jones, J. 1992. Let Me Take You Down: Inside the Mind of Mark David Chapman, the Man Who Killed John Lennon. New York: Villard Books.Google Scholar
Klausen, J. 2009. The Cartoons That Shook the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marr, C. 1989. Taken Pictures: On Interpreting Native American Photographs of the Southern Northwest Coast. The Pacific Northwest Quarterly 80(2): 52–61.Google Scholar
McClary, S. 1987. The Blasphemy of Talking Politics During Bach Year. In R. Leppert and S. McClary (eds.), Music and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Naylor, S. 2014. Appropriation, Culture, and Meaning in Electroacoustic Music: A Composer's Perspective. Organised Sound 19(2): 110–116.Google Scholar
Newton, J.S. 1988. Digital Sampling: The Copyright Considerations of a New Technological Use of Music Performance. Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 11(4): 671–713.Google Scholar
O'Callaghan, C. 2007. Sounds: A Philosophical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pound, R. 1954. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New Haven, Ct: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Proy, G. 2002. Sound and Sign. Organised Sound 7(1): 15–19.Google Scholar
Ramsay, B. 2013. Tools, Techniques and Composition: Bridging acousmatic and IDM. eContact! 14.4, http://cec.sonus.ca/econtact/14_4/ramsay_acousmatic-idm.html Google Scholar
Said, E.W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Schumacher, T.G. 1995. This is a Sampling Sport: Digital Sampling, Rap Music and the Law in Cultural Production. Media Culture Society 17: 253–273.Google Scholar
Shepherd, J., Virden, P., Vulliamy, G., Wishart, T. 1977. Whose Music? A Sociology of Musical Languages. London: Latimer.Google Scholar
Small, C. 1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Hanover, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. 1977. On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Spivak, G.C. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 1994. The Inner and Outer Complexity of Music. Perspectives of New Music 32(1): 176–193.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 1996. Soundscape, Acoustic Communication and Environmental Sound Composition. Contemporary Music Review 15(1): 49–65.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2008. Soundscape Composition as Global Music: Electroacoustic Music as Soundscape. Organised Sound 13(2): 103–109.Google Scholar
Volcler, J. 2013. Extremely Loud: Sound as a Weapon. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Waldcock, J. 2011. Soundmapping: Critiques and Reflections On This New Publicly Engaging Medium. Journal of Sonic Studies 1(1), http://journal.sonicstudies.org/vol01/nr01/a08 Google Scholar
Worthington, A. 2008. A History of Music Torture in the ‘War on Terror’, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-worthington/a-history-of-music-tortur_b_151109.html Google Scholar
Young, C. 1975. Observational Cinema. In P. Hockings (ed.), Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar